In Octavia E. Butler’s novel “Parable of the Sower”, the community was entirely collapsed, and almost everywhere was chaos and out of control. It was obviously in a dark period. The main character, Lauren used to live in the walled community; it was the only small safe place for people tried to maintain a normal life. Because the neighborhood provided a temporary safety, people were willing to stay for education and work even if the walled community had been getting crowded already. To compare and contrast Lauren’s community, it was huge but absolutely chaos and poor outside. People from outside were uneducated, and the government was totally corrupt so that people would just steal, rob and even kill someone in order to survive if they …show more content…
Everyone had equal rights to learn any skills to develop and create a new better life; however, getting education became more and more difficult for many people. According to Kim Clark’s article “College Tuition, Other Costs Climb Again This Year”, he explained that a lot of students could not afford the tuition because it kept growing. For example, “Public university tuition and fees alone rose 4.8% to $8,655. In addition, higher dorm, cafeteria, books and other expenses added significantly to the overall increase” (Clark). Tuition had accounted for about half of that increase, which meant that many students had to pay extra money if they continued to go to school. In fact, not many people could accept this high cost. Especially in the public universities, more than half of the students were living in low-income families (Clark). As a result of that, tuition rising would only affect this huge particular group of students. If these low-income students could not afford to pay school fees, they preferred to drop out of school. Accordingly, more than half of the public university students would lose their rights to get education, which showed that people who would be able to get education become fewer. As people in the walled community, only Lauren and others could read and write, and these few educated people could not improve anything. Even the whole walled neighborhood was eventually destroyed by people who did not get an education. So the
In the writing Fremont High School by Jonathan Kozol he discusses the reality of urban schools and how they are unable to obtain the proper education. At Fremont High School children are not always able to eat during their lunch period, the proper education needed for college is not obtained, the school reflects institutional discrimination, and the building is overcrowded limiting course offerings for children.
This demonstrates that if Sam’s school had got more funding then Sam may have received a proper education, and would have learned the intellectual skills that could help him to obtain a high paying job. Unlike many other people in richer parts of America who are able to achieve a lot in life due to their education, Sam’s lack of wealth ruins his future. Another example is one that hits closer to home- in terms of educational funding, the Illinois system is corrupt, and one of the districts that suffers most is that of Chicago Public Schools. In an interview with Ryan Young from CNN and an anonymous Chicago Public School teacher over the recent strike over budget cuts and the overall lack in school funding, the teacher states, “We care about the students. We want funding for our schools so our children can have supplies… gym, art, and PE., just like the kids in the suburbs do.” This is a direct representation of what is occurring in the Chicago Public School system today as a consequence of budget cuts and unequal funding. In general, the lack of school funding gives poorer children disadvantages when it comes to supplies that can help them to thrive. Also, budget cuts weaken the capacity of schools’ to develop the intelligence and creativity of the next generation of workers. In fact,, funding cuts lessen the ability of the schools to help prepare children better for their future, such as improving teacher
The life the Walls kids put up with was not the way the wanted to live. When Lori graduated high school she moved to New York City. Then Jeanette’s
Jonathan Kozol, in the chapter entitled “Other People’s Children, discusses and justifies the kinds of limitations placed on children who must attend poorly funded, educationally inferior school. Kozol argues that children in the inner-city schools are not fit to go to college and that they should be trained in schools for the jobs they will eventually hold, even though these jobs are less prestigious, lowest-level jobs in society. Kozol’s argument is based on the fact that students from the inner-city or rather from the societies that do not have enough job opportunities are not supposed to learn much because their society cannot accommodate most of the courses that are often found in the urban settings. For example, there is a point where Kozol cites one of the businessman’s statement which says, ‘It doesn’t make sense to offer something that most of these urban kids will never use.’ The businessman continues to argue, ‘no one expects these ghetto kids to go to college. Most of them are lucky if they are literate. If we can teach some useful skills, get them to stay in school and graduate, and maybe into jobs, we’re giving them the most that they can hope for’ (Kozol 376). This statement clearly indicate that the society should accept the inequalities and exercise the same inequalities even in education.
Clarisse’s individuality and her way of living in her dystopian community differ from the rest of the
Healthy relationships amongst families, communities and the government being vital to the success of the nation. Housing and educational expenses were covered by the government leaving the citizens only having to cover personal expenses. Free education provided everyone the opportunity to better themselves and with that society. Children attended school as normal but were placed into specialty schools as they grew helping them narrow down possibilities for future education. Adults who wished to return to school were given the opportunity and were paid to better their education and college age students were kept motivated by having all their expenses covered for the four year period in which they were attending a university.
The education system in the United States has expanded over the years to prepare individuals for the demanding labor market that constitutes our society. It has shifted from the development of mere intellectual scholars to the development of intellectual scholars competitive enough for a work force that now requires a degree for entrance. As this system of education has expanded throughout the country, so has the reproduction of inequality. To explain the manner in which this system has been structured to achieve a gap of inequity among society’s affluent and disadvantaged members, conflict theorist Karl Marx claims that, “School institutions are intentionally designed to integrate individuals into an unjust society” (Brand lecture, January
. In the article “Public College Boosting Aid to Wealthy as Poor Are Left Behind,” by Marian Wand, the author shares a story of little girl, Shauniqua Epps, she is 19 years old. Epps family lives in subsidized housing in South Philadelphia. Epps’ father died when she was in the third grade, her mother lives on social security which provides $698 a month. She has a good GPA and is also good in sports. She applied for three colleges for higher education, but none of the colleges provided financial aid to her. She did not go to any of the colleges because she could not afford the tuition. No one in family can support her because Epps’ mother does not have enough knowledge to encourage her. This proves that the students from low socio-economic background were not encouraged by their
It describes how non wealthy college students will not have an understanding of the literacy and education needed that is taught at an Liberal Arts College. I do not believe that you have to be wealthy to go to a Liberal Arts College. I go to a liberal arts college and I am very appreciative and thankful that I am able to attend this type of college. In all honesty, I am not a wealthy person, I come from a family that works regular jobs with an income that is not near six figures. My parents sacrifice a lot for me to be here. By them sending me here, I am thankful because I feel I can reach my full potential then I would at a regular college or university. Before I left for college my parents told me that the only way to thank them was by getting good grades and pushing through whatever obstacles that I face in college. People that are not rich, have a good understanding on why it is a privilege to come to a Liberal Arts College. Low income people are less careless then wealthy people because they know that they have a lot to lose at the end of the day. By choosing to come to a Liberal Arts College, it helps students excel and reach their full potential unlike at any other college or
There are those who do not like the idea that they are being better served than others are. It makes them feel guilty and upset; they will feel empathy and sympathy to those who never had the opportunities that they had. The minute one acknowledges that one has privilege, that individual must either act on that knowledge, or burry one’s head in the sand. Both in quality of education and in resources, those that are the most under-served are ethnic and racial minorities living in cities. On the other hand, those that are being best served are Caucasians in suburbs, who are disproportionately given the resources and money that urban schools need. Through political and racial attitudes that have persisted from our countries inception, these
All of the protagonists’ experiences are based on living in a lower socioeconomic status. Researchers named Selina Mcoy and Emer Smyth found that “The middle-classes have more to lose by not staying on in education since they risk social demotion, whereas young people from working-class backgrounds may see less benefit to staying on at school”,3 thus revealing that living in poverty or having a lower socioeconomic status is, therefore, difficult to have a good quality education. Researchers whose names are Heather Wyatt- Nichol, Samuel Brown and Warren Haynes discovered, “The widening gap between the rich and the poor contributes to economic segregation among neighborhoods, perpetuating the problem of inequality in the education and criminal justice system” (190)2, thus explaining the hardship the protagonists faced in their personal experiences. It is evident their lower socioeconomic status affected their education, and it is a crucial theme
At the open of The Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler, the characters experience a shortage in safe, quality housing; within our course we have explored the crisis of housing as it exists today and as it is influenced by the militarization and securitization of private property.
Equal opportunity was not afforded to all classes as students of lower classes stayed home to assist their family due to economic hardships. For example, “they come first day every year then leave” (Lee 30) explains the Ewells’ inability to get out of
Social Convention and Samuel Butler's Erewhon There are many conceivable explanations that have the potential to rationalize the preservation of society through time. These explanations clarify the fact that society, since its inception, has continued to exist. I assert that the precise reason for this self-perpetuation is convention, and moreover, that convention encompasses all of the other possible explanations for this continuance. Yet this conclusion merely follows from proper distinctions of terminology.
In the worst area of Manila, the smell of garbage fills the air, people do what they can just to survive, yet there is this little girl who gets all cleaned up and puts on a pretty dress just to go outside and play. It is the only life she has known, that of poverty. While on the other side of Manila, not far from her, is a life she could only dream of. No smell of garbage, gated homes, tree lined streets and a life of luxury. What may seem like it’s in another country, is just on the other side of Manila.