preview

The Surveillance Of Consumers By Retail Anthropologists

Better Essays

The prompt is "In an argumentative essay, support, refute, or complicate the claim that the surveillance of consumers by retail anthropologists is manipulative and unethical." Retail anthropologists track customers through separate cameras, tracking systems that sometimes incorporate the loss prevention cameras, loyalty cards, and surveys. These are not typically the same systems that prevent crime. Please feel free to re-review the Gladwell article and the supplemental videos for more information. If appropriate, please reconsider your stance and supporting points with this information in mind. Intro: I complicate the claim that the surveillance of consumers by retail anthropologists is manipulative and unethical. Although it can be manipulative, it is ethical. "If you haven 't done anything wrong, you have nothing to fear” (Wu, Chung, Yamat, Richman). Thesis: Although some claim that retail anthropologists’ placement of surveillance cameras for consumers while shopping is manipulative, it is not in fact unethical because their actions are meant for the benefit of the consumers, the benefit of the producers, and most importantly, shoppers are aware of the surveillance cameras. Body 1 Benefit of the consumers: The manipulation of retail anthopologists and the information acquired by the surveillance cameras help improve the shopping experience for consumers. Assisting consumers by making their shopping experiences more enjoyable, with a better store layout and/or

Get Access