The Sugar Act Of 1764 Dbq Seq

“Despite the view of some historians that the conflict between Great Britain and its thirteen North American colonies was economic in origin, in fact the American Revolution had its roots in politics and other areas of American life.” Great Britain and the American colonies had a relationship impacted with many hardships. I believe that there was a political struggle between the two groups, but that Great Britain and the American colonies used economics as a chance to show how much control they had. Multiple Acts written by Parliament, the colonies' Committees of Correspondence and Continental Congress created political friction between Great Britain and the American colonies.

As generations grew up in America, nationalism within the colonies grew towards their new country. These settlers slowly lost their patriotic tie to Great Britain and it’s ruler, King George III. So when the French and Indian War ended in America, and the indebted England needed some compensation from American settlers in the form of taxes, the colonists questioned the authority of England and their ability to rule them. British imperial policies such as the Sugar Act of 1764 and the Townshend Tea Tax caused uproar within the colonies against British rule without

There were several major disagreements between the American colonists and British rule between 1763 and the beginning of the Revolutionary War. The British, along with the colonists, had won a costly war against the French and their Indian allies. It was during this time that England’s views of the New World had started to shift. Rather than focusing on the trade opportunities, more and more policymakers concerned themselves with the land expansion of the British colonies. The British also felt that the Americans were the primary beneficiaries of the war, and should help pay for the debt. American colonists up until this point had been governed very loosely by Parliament and were not receptive to the new laws, taxes, or the increased British

We the people of the United States colonies requested you revoke these unfair and damaging taxes, and we will do what we want when we an to do it. We deserve respect and that's what we will get!

To the people of England, this act was one of the significant act as the Parliament had been collecting tax money from the colonists for everything. Moreover, the colonists are required to put tax stamps on many documents such as newspapers and letters. But the colonists did not want this act to happen as they had to pay more tax which must be in the British currency. “The act was passed by parliament on March 22, 1765 and it became effective on November 1, 1765” (Tindall and Shi, 193). This act came to practice to assists the troops of England and for keeping American frontier safe. This act was not a practical act because the colonist had curiosity in parliament only to eradicate stamp act.

In turn, the Sugar Act would help Britain to have a monopoly on the sugar trade by imposing taxes and strict enforcement on sugar and molasses imported from other non-British Colonies; specifically, in connection to the Greenland and Eastland trades (http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/sugar_act_1764.asp). By doing so, the Colonies would be more inclined to do business with Britain, in turn, would benefit from the increase in sugar and molasses prices (Britannica). In sum, the Sugar Act provided Britain with increased influence on the sugar trade and an increase for its price of

Under the Molasses Act, the citizens had to pay 6 pence per gallon on foreign molasses. Because of this act, the citizens did not want to purchase foreign molasses, therefore the act fell. Then the Sugar Act was passed by the British Parliament because of the nearing expiration of the Molasses Act and the poor response of the citizens to this act. Eventually, the Sugar Act was passed in order to gain more money for the army by taxing everyday goods. In addition, the Sugar Act made tax collection more efficient.

The Sugar Act, passed by Parliament of Great Britain in 1764, was an act that placed taxes on sugar, molasses, and other products shipped to the colonies. It increased enforcement of smuggling laws and called for harsh punishments towards smugglers. The purpose of the Sugar Act was to stop trade between New England and the Middle Colonies with French, Dutch, and Spanish in the West Indies. Parliament decided to pass the Sugar Act because it would recover some the military expenses for protecting and defending the colonies. The Sugar Act was also a way for England to control over the colonies. It was the first major action on behalf of Britain that eventually led to the American Revolution. The Sugar Act was enacted on April 5, 1764. The most

In this lesson, it explained the different act that cause people to pay taxes. In High School, we learned about the Sugar act, Stamp act and Boston Tea Party. The Sugar act was appoint by Georgie the third. The act required people to pay taxes on sugar and other item. I find it hard to believe people had to pay taxes on sugar, I guess sugar was very valuable in that time period. The Sugar act was created to pay for the Quartering Act of 1765. People who fail to pay their taxes had to go to sugar court. In 1765, the British government passed another law that increase the taxes on the colonies. The American people were furious about this. So, the people form a group cause The Son of Liberty. The Son of Liberty boycott against items from England.

Although American colonists always tried to negotiate the contentious policies which contradicted their principles with the British Parliament, the crown did not leave much room for the discussion fueling the Anglo-American debate with a stubborn constitutional position; with a ridiculous notion as virtual representation; with a large British army that limited the economic development of the country; with the unjust acts that forced to shell out revenues from the colonies;

By 1765, there was quite a bit of tension between the American colonies and the mother country, England. The Sugar Act (Goldfield, the American Journey, 123) had left a sour taste of distrust in England in the mouths of the colonials. They were now told who they could trade with and how much and felt restricted by the King, who lived an entire ocean away. This led to stirrings of rebellion, and in an effort to stop that, Britain attempted (and succeeded in some cases) to pass a string of new laws, or Acts, to corral the colonials into submission.

In 1763 it was announced, that the British ministry had it in view to " tax the colonies, for the purpose of raising a revenue, which was to be placed at the disposal of the crown.' This news filled the colonies with alarm. In Massachusetts, a committee was appointed by the people of Boston to express the public sentiment in relation to this contemplated measure, for the guidance of the representatives to the general court. The instructions of this committee were drawn by Mr. Adams. They formed, in truth, a powerful remonstrance against the injustice of the contemplated system of taxation; and they merit the more particular notice, as they were the first recorded public document, which denied the right of taxation to the British parliament. They also contained the first suggestion of the propriety of that mutual understanding and correspondence among the colonies, which laid the foundation of their future confederacy. Ill these instructions, after alluding to the evils which had resulted from the acts of the British parliament, relating to trade, Mr. Adams observes: -- "If our trade may be taxed, why not our lands? Why not the produce of our lands, and every thing we possess, or use? This we conceive annihilates our charter rights to govern and tax ourselves. It strikes at our British privileges, which, as we have never

For a better part of the eighteenth century, the American colonists expressed vexation and disapproval of the "coercive " acts, which the British Government perpetrated on the colony through series of legislative acts by the British Parliament. Prior to the acts that the colonists in America termed as atrocious and oppressive, they were willing to cooperate and reaffirm loyalty to the King of England. Some of the legislations and declarations that colonists participated in was the sustenance of British soldiers in the colony, payment of import tariffs and other forms of taxes to support the British central government. These are but a few, the reasons as to why colonists objected to the mode of British rule in America. Another concern was the "Rights violations" by the English government regarding economic progress and representation. Because of these grievances, British colonists in America stepped up agitation through violation of the "tyrannical" Acts and petitions through the Continental Congress. The essay explores the grievances that Colonists in America held against the British government, in riposte to "My Dear America Cousin" letter.

These differences prevailed between 1763 and 1776, when the British enforced series of policies and acts/taxes that restricted the colonists on certain things under the Grenville ministry, this then led to the colonists intensified resistance through different types of protests and revolts towards other taxes, and in turn strengthened their commitment to republican values by influencing them to establish a new nation.

     The passing of the Stamp Act by Parliament in 1765 caused a rush of angry protests by the colonists in British America that perhaps "aroused and unified Americans as no previous political event ever had." It levied a tax on legal documents, almanacs, newspapers, and nearly every other form of paper used in the colonies. Adding to this hardship was the need for the tax to be paid in British sterling, not in colonial paper money. Although this duty had been in effect in England for over half a century and was already in effect in several colonies in the 1750?s, it called into question the authority of Parliament over the overseas colonies that had no representation therein.