preview

The Strength Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

Better Essays

“The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it,” (Albert Einstein). Just as Einstein said, United States citizens needed to decide whether or not they should uphold the Constitution with the "determination" Einstein illustrated. After the Revolutionary War, colonists tried to find new means of national government. Subsequently, they settled with the Articles of Confederation. Realizing that the central government was given barely any power, a variety of political leaders came up with a solution which was soon released to the public: the United States Constitution. Federalists and Anti-federalists took sides and set off into a fierce debate, determining whether they should support the ratification …show more content…

One primary argument made by Federalists was that the United States needed a stronger national government to strengthen the nation in its crisis. For example, The Massachusetts Sentinel, a colonial newspaper stated, “Let us look and behold the distresses which prevail in every part of our country… View these things, fellow citizens, and then say that we do not require a new, a protecting, and efficient federal government if you can.” (Document 1). Evidently, the excerpt from this newspaper addresses the “distresses” of the United States can be resolved through a more efficient federal government the new constitution provides. Another primary argument made by the Federalists was that the U.S. Constitution would promote the United States’ public image and credibility among the European countries and claim their place as a developing nation. For instance, The Massachusetts Sentinel also established, “...the insults that are offered to the American name and character in every court of Europe…” (Document 1). The authors of …show more content…

Federalists argued that the Constitution would improve the nation’s economy and social status, as well as fixing the errors made in the Articles of Confederation. Anti-federalists argued that the new Constitution’s executive branch received too much power and the poorer and less educated would receive the least power. Anti-federalists also argued that the Constitution would violate their natural rights and freedoms. Although the Anti-federalists may have made solid arguments, the federalists won the debate. In order for the Anti-federalists to agree with the U.S. Constitution. The convention compromised with the Anti-federalists to write the Bill of Rights to protect and secure citizens rights. Slowly, but surely the U.S. corrected other errors addressed by the Anti-federalists Constitution along the way. All in all, this discourse was a healthy debate for shaping the present United States of

Get Access