preview

The Stamp Act

Decent Essays

The British attempt to regain control of the American Colonies was poorly executed and extremely tyrannical in its approach. Through the 1760s and 1770s, England passed a litany of invasive and restrictive laws and outrageous taxes on the colonies without the colonies being fairly represented in British Parliament. Acts passed in the 1760s include the Proclamation of
1763, The Sugar Act, The Quartering Act, The Stamp Act, and the Townshend Acts. These actions by the British continued and increased in severity during the 1770s. Acts passed leading up to the American Revolution in the 1770s include The Tea Act and The Coercive and Quebec
Acts.
The 1760s began the race to resentment for the American Colonists. After the French-
Indian War, which …show more content…

The Stamp Act mandated the use of stamped paper for all official papers within the colonies. The stamp was embedded in the paper itself and represented that the tax had been paid.
The colonists were told that the tax revenue from the Stamp Act would pay for the British soldiers stationed in North America. Colonists were also threatened with being tried in a
“Crown-operated vice admiralty court”4 rather than a court made of Colonial peers. The Stamp
Act was met with resistance from the Colonists in the form of boycotts, a Congress meeting, and rioting. The Stamp Act Congress met in New York in 1765 as an act of defiance. The Congress was rather conciliatory to the King and even British Parliament, however they did illustrate the frustrations of the Colonies and that taxes were imposed on them by the Parliament without proper representation. Less formal protests were organized in boycott and riots. The Daughters of Liberty organized boycotts against British made cloth and tea. They also held spinning bees to produce homespun American-made cloth. Abigail Adams and Sarah Franklin Bache were
2 Schultz, 88. 3 Schultz, 88. 4 Schultz, 89
May 4 instrumental to making the boycotts happen. The Sons of Liberty also organized more …show more content…

The last provision meant that colonial merchants could no longer sell tea. The Act was also designed to undercut the illegal Dutch tea trade because it made English tea cheaper, and thus hopefully for Britain and the East India Company, more appealing to American consumers. It did the exact opposite.
Colonists were outraged because many tea merchants lost their livelihoods to the royal agents and the timing made them interpret it as another move to assert Parliament’s power over the
Colonies. This outrage led to the Boston Tea Party, where about 60 Colonists dressed as
Mohawk Indians snuck onto a tea ship and dumped 342 chests of tea into the Boston Harbor.
The Boston Tea Party had pushed the conflict to another level.7
This protest by the Colonists led to swift action by Parliament in the form of the Coercive and Quebec Acts. The Coercive Acts were composed of four separate acts in which Boston’s port was shut down until all the tea destroyed in the Tea Party was paid for, most of
Massachusetts’ self-governance was terminated, it was dictated that any British official

Get Access