preview

The Spread of Soviet-Backed Communism Across Eastern Europe after 1945

Better Essays

The Spread of Soviet-Backed Communism Across Eastern Europe after 1945

In seeking to provide an answer to the question, “Was the spread of
Soviet-backed communism inevitable across Eastern Europe after 1945?,” I would like to point to the words of a contemporary specialist. At the end of
World War II, R. R. Betts, the Masaryk Professor of Central European History at London University, asserted that much of the “revolution in central and eastern Europe” is “native and due to the efforts of the peoples and their own leaders . . . [making it] “clear that even if the Soviet Union had not been so near and so powerful, revolutionary changes would have come at the end of so destructive and subversive a war as that which ended …show more content…

Yet there are many such cases within the purview of this question. However, I do not completely disagree with the thesis of inevitability of Soviet-backed communism or at least some form of authoritarianism. Thus, in the first section of this paper, I will air much of the support for that assertion and conclude that it was highly likely
Soviet-backed communism would eventually accomplish what it did. However, in a second section, I will argue that this outcome was hardly a fait accompli in 1945. Neither the subtleties of Eastern Europe’s possible economic relations with the West in the form of the Marshall plan nor the lack of uniformity of the processes by which different states became Soviet satellites bear out the thesis of inevitability.

The main strands of the argument for the inevitability of both authoritarianism and Soviet-backed communism follow: The liberal democracies established in Eastern Europe after World War I were enfeebled by many factors, so much so that by the beginning of World War II, authoritarianism was already the norm. Thus, the post-war step to further authoritarianism was not very large. The Wilsonian attempt at creating nations “produced conditions hardly less destabilizing than those that had characterized the pre-1914 period,” chiefly because of the sheer number of different ethnicities with the “vehement desire . . . to secure revision of the post-war settlement” (Lewis 28, 30). The

Get Access