Gestalt Goldberg
The sum of the parts does not always equal the whole, especially in poetry. In the anthology On the Blossoming, Lea Goldberg explores the concept of desire. On the surface, this idea seems well analyzed and discussed. However, by carefully tracking words, symbols, and images across the poems “Dialogue”, “Songs of the Foxes”, and “Clear Autumn,” Goldberg slyly elucidates the ephemeral nature of desire, the dichotomy between actions and emotions, and all the while exposes an over-arching narrative. Word choice plays a crucial role in understanding the poem “Dialogue.” The words “love”, “body”, “bore”, “shape”, and “lips” are all used in this short poem. Immediately, this keens the reader into a commentary about love between the two speakers, He and She. The conflict in the poem arises from He being bound to love full of “abundance and splendor” and She being inhibited, by an immense barrier, to love. She even exclaims how without love, She’s blind, and that if “this [love] were to occur” She’d be resurrected. Furthermore, She mentions how “currently nothing remains to survive,” that her present is banal. The poem thus takes on the form of a warning call about how a romance can only truly come to fruition through requited love. This reciprocation enables a healthy open mind, as opposed to a singular lens of a He or She. The idea of a requited romance and selection of lustful words are not unique to “Dialogue”, similar motifs and techniques occur throughout
So we ask ourselves, how does poetry gain its power? To answer this question, we examine the work of poets Harwood and Plath. ‘The Glass Jar’, composed by Gwen Harwood portrays its message through the emotions of a young child, while the poem ‘Ariel’, written by Sylvia Plath, makes effective use of emotions to convey artistic creativity and inspiration.
Shakespeare’s sonnet 130, “My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun” and Pablo Neruda’s “My ugly love” are popularly known to describe beauty in a way hardly anyone would write: through the truth. It’s a common fact that modern lovers and poets speak or write of their beloved with what they and the audience would like to hear, with kind and breathtaking words and verses. Yet, Shakespeare and Neruda, honest men as they both were, chose to write about what love truly is, it matters most what’s on the inside rather than the outside. The theme of true beauty and love are found through Shakespeare and Neruda’s uses of imagery, structure, and tone.
The speaker in Gascoigne’s poem feels conflicted and manipulated. They express this through their word choice and imagery. In the first quatrain, the speaker introduces the problem with his love interest and explains this attitude of avoidance and mistrust through depressing diction. For example, the speaker tells his lover that she should “not wonder” when he holds his “loving head” down when he passes her on the street. His actions show he is avoiding contact with the woman rather than pursuing her.
Imagine reading a poem and believing it means one thing, but the underlying message is something completely different. Authors like to use different literary techniques to make a valid point, to make the reader feel a certain emotion, or even to share a distinct memory with their reader. Poetry has helped authors focus their readers on their work by achieving themes that may portrayed in several pieces of their work. In May Swenson’s case, she used a variety of techniques to create different emotions for the reader, while expressing certain periods of her life. May Swenson uses nature in her poetry to personify sexuality and make it into a repetitive theme in her work. Many of Swenson’s critics can agree
Spring is the season of growth, revival and beginnings. In the poems “Spring and All” by William Carlos Williams and “For Jane Meyers” by Louise Gluck, the poets talk about this very season. In fact, the two poems are contradictory, in that, Williams writes about the bleakness of winter and the awakening of spring. On the other hand, Gluck’s romantic poetry associates the natural renewal of spring with bereavement and death. Both poets use abundant imagery, symbolism, metaphors, different tones, and similes, to affirm their contending attitudes towards the season. Consequently, although the poems are about the same subject, the demeanor of the poets are varied.
The art of poetry speaks to people through the deep meanings represented in the words of the author. These meanings are meticulously pieced together through the mind of the writer. Readers can unveil the words to find truth within the work. The truth being presented in George Gascoigne’s poem illustrates a man that has given up on love because of his past heartbreak. It’s obvious that past failed relationships have altered the speaker’s view of love. George Gascoigne utilizes metaphors in “For That He Looked Not Upon Her”, to revel the truths that are embedded in the poem.
The use of the language is not only to speak a story of love, but also to stay somewhat true to the original story by Shakespeare so that the audience of today can still experience it the way the audience of Shakespeare’s time would
Like every marketed love story out there, the poem starts off with two souls who secretly admire each other, yet are too afraid to admit it. In a society that at that time would quite possibly think
This composition contains several characteristics of a traditional love poem. But, if you analyze deeper into the poem, you may discover that “To Coy His Mistress” is more of a dramatic monologue. The speaker does all of the talking, which stamps the writing as a monologue. The rhetorician is conversing with his mistress, which defines the lyric as dramatic. Although, as the reader, you may identify with
Franscesco Petrach’ sonnet “Upon the Breeze she Spread her Golden Hair” is a love poem in which the persona describes his love feelings about the subject, Laura. However, he laments that while his love for her is everlasting, it only results in pain because the feeling is not mutual thus not reciprocated by Laura. In fact, the structure and style of the poem help in conveying his message. Petrach uses metre, rhyme, and alliteration to impart the feeling of euphony in the audience regarding the poem. Nonetheless, there are few instances in which he deviates from the set structure, which mirrors real life situations and the love experience he describes as imperfect.
Unlike other forms of literature, poetry can be so complex that everyone who reads it may see something different. Two poets who are world renowned for their ability to transform reader’s perceptions with the mere use of words, are TS Eliot and Walt Whitman. “The love song of J Alfred Prufrock” by TS Eliot, tells the story of a man who is in love and contemplating confessing his emotions, but his debilitating fear of rejection stops him from going through with it. This poem skews the reader’s expectations of a love song and takes a critical perspective of love while showing all the damaging emotions that come with it. “Song of myself”, by Walt Whitman provokes a different emotion, one of joy and self-discovery. This poem focuses more on the soul and how it relates to the body. “Song of myself” and “The love song of J Alfred Prufrock” both explore the common theme of how the different perceptions of the soul and body can affect the way the speaker views themselves, others, and the world around them.
Love makes people become selfish, but it is also makes the world greater. In this poem, the world that the speaker lives and loves is not limited in “my North, my South, my East and West / my working week and my Sunday rest” (9-10), it spreads to “My noon, my midnight, my talk, my song (11). The poem’s imagery dominates most of the third stanza giving readers an image of a peaceful world in which everything is in order. However, the last sentence of the stanza is the decisive element. This element not only destroys the inner world of the speaker, but it also sends out the message that love or life is mortal.
Several poems in the anthology explore the intensity of human emotion. Explore this theme, referring to these three poems in detail and by referencing at least three other poems from your wider reading.’
Strong emotions of women in love are presented in these three pieces of texts using many different linguistic techniques to express the heightened and almost erratic emotions; enabling the audience and reader to sympathise and capture the fluctuations of human feelings. ‘The Laboratory’ explores the narrator's vehement feelings of jealousy, unreciprocated love and revenge in a dramatic monologue based around heartbreak, betrayal and the repercussions of revenge. However, Shakespeare's persona conveys a range of emotions throughout the play ‘Romeo and Juliet’. Love, lust, loyalty and hatred are portrayed by Juliet in different situations and circumstances throughout the play. ‘Havisham’ is written as the monologue of a woman who was jilted at the altar, and was so devastated by the loss that she couldn’t progress in life.
The alliteration of “dearly, disinterestedly, devotedly” highlights the flat—almost bored—tone of the declaration as it slogs through its sequence of adverbs. Darnay touts his love as a great force of the universe but does so with the most mundane possible phrasing, and the repetition of the word love is dogged and uninspired. Carton’s words, on the other hand, betray a deep emotional struggle, suggesting the existence of feelings more complex than Darnay’s. In his depiction of his love, Carton attracts the reader’s sympathy in a way that Darnay does not. Whereas Darnay makes an objective, factual statement of his love for Lucie, Carton describes his emotions, tinged as they are by realistic insecurity and uncertainty.