The Similarities Between Victor And The Creature In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

When Victor encounters many struggles during the creation of the creature, he is compelled on by “hope [that his] present attempts would at least lay the foundations of future success” (Shelley, 1818, p. 39). The idea of glory, that he could become a scientist as well known as Galileo or Newton, drives him to create the creature. Frankenstein also dreams that “a new species would bless [him] as its creator and source; many happy and excellent natures would owe their being to [him]. No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely as [he] should deserve theirs” (Shelley, 1818, p. 40).To Frankenstein, fatherhood is synonymous with becoming a god. He pays no regard to the morals and responsibilities that come with being a parent, instead focusing on the showers of love and praise the creature and others would give

In the novel Frankenstein, Victor and the Monster had the same correlation throughout the entire book. They were always dealing with the same situations. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, with Victor and the Monster. From nature, family, and living in desolation, they shared an abundance in common.

Victor’s motivation of forming a new life unintentionally tears him apart when it indorses Victor’s solitary and his dream of perfect creation becomes the hideous, grotesque monster. While Frankenstein attends university at Ingolstadt, he became utterly obsessed with finding out what the spawn of life really was. He only focused on science of human animation, which he describes that he “was imbued with high hopes and a lofty ambition.” He loses the sight of any other thing in life that brought him joy, because his was excessively motivated to accomplish his ardent desire of creating the perfect life. He isolates himself by tinkering in his laboratory, yet his motivation lets Victor to relinquish communication with family and friends. Because

Victor Frankenstein lies and cheats his way through life. He causes problems and refuses to accept that they are his fault. Victor is clearly the bigger monster than his creature in the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. The creature and Victor do have similarities in a good origin story and feeling similar to the story of Lucifer’s creation. They are more different though because of how they feel after doing something wrong and how they feel about themselves and how blame should be placed for the crimes.

The main theme within Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein pits Frankenstein against his creature, in an almost seemingly God vs. disciple situation. Shelley’s masterful work reflects the scientific changes during the Enlightenment, a time of tension between God and science Although fictional, the purpose of Shelley’s novel is demonstrated through every page, a continuous build-up of conflict between Frankenstein and his monster as to who truly had the power at hand. In order to do this, Shelley employs a prophetic tone, which she constructs throughout the whole novel, but is most apparent during a conversation between Frankenstein and his teacher, M. Waldman, occurring even before the Victor creates the monster.

Being key figures of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Victor Frankenstein and his monster are in a special relationship with each other. This tie goes far beyond Frankenstein only being the creator of the monster he brings alive. There are numerous similarities and differences of both characters that may or may not lead to the conclusion that Frankenstein has created his own double. One argument for this interpretation, surely, is the genre of Shelley’s novel. As the author’s writings are categorized in the Gothic genre, the doppelganger is one of the common motifs. Therefore, this paper points out striking analogies and discrepancies between Frankenstein and the being he creates, as well as weighing up whether the two characters could be deduced

A multitude of evidences show similarities between the Frankenstein’s creature and Mary Shelley’s. These indications show that the novel may be an autobiography. On the other hand, the novel shows a lot of the characteristics of science fiction. The novel cannot be classified as both, a real description and a fiction narrative, at the same time. An informed opinion about this controversy requires the evaluation of redundant critics. Sherry Ginn uses “Mary Shelley 's Frankenstein: Science, Science Fiction, or Autobiography?” to adequate argue that Frankenstein’s creature is a science fiction novel by showing that it is not an autobiography, and by showing that the novel has all the characteristics of a science fiction narrative.

In the book, Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, the author illustrates similarities between both Victor and the Monster he creates. She draws parallels between the two regarding their feelings on family, nature, on exacting revenge, and how they both become isolated from society. Both are able to demonstrate extreme intelligence. As the novel progresses, Victor and the Monster become more similar to each other. Their relationship turns to one in which each is consumed with getting revenge on the other at all costs.

Similarity in a monster and a man Victor creates a monster and soon realizes their differences, which causes him to shun his creation. Although neither the monster nor Victor see it, they are very similar to each other. Victor is going through the process of creating his monster and during this process he is a lot happier during the spring/summer months. “The summer months passed…it was the most beautiful season; never did the fields bestow a more plentiful harvest…my eyes were insensible to the charms of nature.” (Shelly 49).

Throughout the novel the usage of writing is used to help individuals understand more about human actions and their natures. Such writings have a strong influence with both the Creature and Victor due to their obsession with their goals. While these writings permit both the creature and Victor to obtain their objectives, it also restricts them of other functions. In a sense the writings themselves are like a double edge sword, depending in the individual it can create havoc within the individual.

The central conflict of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein centers around the two main characters of Victor Frankenstein and the Creature he creates. Throughout reading the entire novel, the reader may decide to view either Victor or the Creature as more sympathetic based on their environment, decisions, and actions. The crux of the debate usually centers upon whether or not Victor owes more to humans, his own species, or the Creature, essentially his own large child. Victor owes more to the Creature than any human, because his original abandonment and refusal to accept the Creature at any point leaves him as the more guilty party.

Have you uncovered Victor’s true character yet? Throughout Frankenstein, surprisingly the reader can distinguish a number of differences, rather than similarities, between him and the creature regarding aspects of regret and murders that took place. These points also reveal that Victor is way more malicious, compared to the monster, because his sins outweigh those of the monster’s. The story commenced with a character named Walton who had come across Victor. Victor was well off and received lavish attention from his parents during his childhood years. With an interest in the science field, he had created a malicious creature. As the story persists, both characters, the creature and Victor, gain an increasing hatred for one another leading to

Throughout the novel Frankenstein written by Mary Shelley, the creature is subjected to countless acts of violence and rejection. For a monster to develop, one must have been formerly exploited either by an individual or their society. The creature is not only a physical product of science, but his atrocious behavior is also an explicit result of Victor’s actions toward him. The creature was not born a monster, but slowly morphed into one as he experiences violence and rejection from his society.

A novel is a form as the letter leader Robert Walton of an arctic expedition team wrote for his elder sister. While going to the geographic pole, Walton finds the man who weakened and helps him at the Arctic Ocean. He is Victor Frankenstein, and he begins to tell Walton about the experience.

While Creature is full of humanity and has a thirst for knowledge, his longing for acceptance in society is met with constant rejection. Through this rejection, it sparks anger into the Creature for his irresponsible creator, Victor Frankenstein. Creature’s anger leads to greater tragedies for Victor. The greater of the tragedies are the murdering of innocent people including Victor’s family that is seen to be the fault of Creature since he is the one who murdered them. If Victor did not abandon the Creature and had taught him murder was not morally correct, Creature would not have committed the heinous acts.When Creature was first theoretically born, he was introduced into the world in a very harsh way. Metaphorically, Creature starts out into the world as a newborn, needing a parent 's guidance and teachings. Victor abandons him immediately with no sense of direction. Creature, after his “birth”, approaches Victor with a hand of longing for compassion. “He held up the curtain of the bed; and his eyes, if eyes they maybe called, were fixed on me...He might have spoken, but I did not hear; one hand was stretched out” (Shelley 35). Victor instead of showing acceptance immediately runs away at the sight of him.