preview

The Role Of Destruction In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

Decent Essays

Destruction Today’s society is so fixated on discovering ways to scientifically improve and create life. Researchers have dedicated their entire life to finding ways to do these unthinkable tasks. Much like the scientists and researchers, Victor Frankenstein, from Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, has dedicated his entire life and freedom to create life by his own hands. Scientific progresses, such as the creation of life and today’s genetic developments, for knowledge should not be performed due to the fact they have destroyed and will destroy people’s lives in the future. In the novel, Victor starts creating his monster, but it is not until he looks into his creature’s eyes that he realizes it was a mistake, and becomes fearful. He exemplifies …show more content…

Victor begins to create a mate for the monster, but soon realizes it was an awful mistake saying it was “of madness on my promise of creating another like him, and trembling with passion, [I] tore [it] to pieces” (154 Shelley). The monster saw Victor destroying his mate, and vowed he would soon destroy Victor’s life! Victor decided to ignore this threat and went home to marry his love, Elizabeth. On the night of his wedding, he was walking around outside awaiting the monster’s return for revenge. All of a sudden, he hears the scream of Elizabeth and soon realizes it was not him the monster was coming for that day. He rushes in the house only to see “a grin...on the face of the monster…[as] he pointed towards the corpse of [his] wife” (184 Shelley). When his father heard of the news, he was devastated and could no longer “live under the horrors...and in a few days he die[d] in [Victor’s] arms” (186 Shelley). By creating this monster, Victor lost control of his creation and lost everything and everyone he cared most about. Little did Mary Shelley know while writing this novel, today’s society would actually find ways to create …show more content…

While this seems like it could be great and harmless, when you really think about it you are trying to create something that does not exist, perfection. Specialists say you can control the gender of your child by what is today’s most well-known method called, The Shettles Method, which involves timing a woman’s cycle to the couples position during intercourse. Though this seems like a harmless method, experts “worry that some parents will place unrealistic hopes on a sex-determination technique and become disappointed [if] they [don’t] succeed. The method could either fail to produce a baby of the desired sex, or the right-gendered kid could grow up with traits that contradict with parental expectations...ethicists worry about the welfare of the child” (Zamora). Other studies have proven that you can now prevent women from having a genetically mental child by taking “mitochondrial DNA out of eggs and replac[ing] them with healthy genes from eggs donated by other women” (Stein). Experts have not yet tried this on human embryos, but have on monkeys. This could lead to a child having three genetic parents due to the fact that the child would “inherit DNA from the father’s sperm; from the egg of the woman whose egg was fixed; and from the egg of the woman who donated some of her DNA to fix the problem” (Stein). Experiments like these could ultimately affect our future in many ways, both in a good way and bad way. Expert Ronald

Get Access