preview

The Roadmap Rhetorical Analysis

Better Essays

Similarly to the second part of the documentary, part three of the documentary focuses on three main actors, their goals, obstacles and achievements. Primarily, the documentary builds on the second parts’ focus on Ariel Sharon, however shows a shift in his objectives toward consolidating power in Greater Israel. Nonetheless the offensive strategy seems to persist, merely by less aggressive means. In addition, the roles of Abdullah II bin Al-Hussein and most notably Abu Mazen are brought to light. Both parties shared the goal of bringing the second intifada to a halt, however for different reasons and by different defensive methods which shall be outlined below.
Abdullah II bin Al-Hussein, the King of Jordan since 1999, became further involved in the Palestine-Israeli conflict in 2003. This was due to the influx of Palestinian refugees in his country as a result of the intifada. As outlined by the documentary, he aimed to reduce the levels of refugees in Jordan by becoming involved in negotiations which seeked to establish a two-state system.
Bush had expressed his support for the two-state system in 2002, resulting in United Nations Security Council Resolution 1397, which called an end to the violence …show more content…

Foreign Service Officer Donald Blome, comprised of three key components which had significant effects on negotiations. The first being the fact that the Roadmap was unique in the fact that it required simultaneous actions from both parties. This was unlike any proposal that had come before it. The result of this was mistrust, particularly from Israel, whose cabinet voted against the Roadmap. Nonetheless, the steps outlined in the Roadmap were publicly accepted following unilateral adjustments, among which Palestine was made responsible for acting first. It can be argued that, given the lack of direct support from the cabinet, notwithstanding the multiple adjustments made to the agreement, the Roadmap was not taken seriously by

Get Access