The Road To Disunion: The Cause Of The Civil War

In the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Stephen Douglass wanted to expand land west, so that he could make the transcontinental railroad. He proposed a bill that made the western land Kansas and Nebraska. These two territories would likely become free states because they were above the 36 degrees 30’ line. Since he wanted the railroad system, he needed to souths support, but they would not want to have Kansas and Nebraska enter the Union as free states, because it would upset the balance of free and slave states. Then Stephen Douglass wanted to abandon the Missouri Compromise and

This was known as popular sovereignty. Douglas and others believed that although the area was part of the Louisiana Purchase lands, it would not repeal the Missouri Compromise because it was only for territories, not for states. Territories were under Congress’s exclusive jurisdiction which meant they only had to abide by federal laws. (Document B) Both sides were angered and worried about rich people buying land and moving to these territories in order to sway the votes. This act failed to achieve its purpose and instead further divided the nation as violence and hatred flooded throughout the

Many Northerners were infuriated when Congress eliminated the Missouri Compromise and passed on the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The act allowed each territory to settle the issue of slavery based on popular sovereignty (The Kansas-Nebraska). In other words, people were allowed to decide for themselves to determine what was best for their state. By repealing the Missouri Compromise, the North fear that it will enable slavery into areas that have been free for years. However, once Congress passed the law, numerous of pro-slavery and antislavery groups began rushing into Kansas(Chapter 15, 443). Their primary goal was to get in as many votes as possible which will determine if Kansas legislature support or ban slavery. In the final results, Kansas laws

territory. As northern settlers poured into Kansas, however, in 1861 it qualified for admission to the union as a state where slavery was illegal. So many Northerners were distraught over the Kansas-Nebraska Act that they founded a new, purely northern, purely anti-slavery political party. the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opened new lands, repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, and allowed settlers in those territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries. The initial purpose of the Kansas-Nebraska Act was to create opportunities for a Transcontinental Railroad. It was not problematic until popular jurisdiction was written into the proposal. The act was designed by Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois. The act established that settlers could vote to decide whether to allow slavery, in the name of "popular sovereignty" or rule of the people. Douglas hoped it would ease relations in both North and South, because the South could expand slavery to new territories but the North still had the right to abolish slavery in their states. He was wrong; opponents denounced the law as a privilege to the slave power of the South. The new Republican Party, which was created in opposition to the act, aimed to stop the expansion of slavery, and soon emerged as the dominant force throughout the

A leading example of the struggles of slavery in the western states was the struggle over slavery in Kansas. Document F depicts a political cartoon basically stating that Stephen Douglas, Franklin Pierce, and James Buchanan all attempted intentionally or unintentionally to spread slavery to the West. Stephen Douglas proposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act in which the Midwest Nebraska territory would be divided into two states Kansas and Nebraska and the issue of slavery would be determined by in state vote known as "popular sovereignty". Franklin Pierce aided with the signing of the bill. The results upon this bill was harsh fighting between pro-slavery supporters and non-slavery supporters in Kansas over this issue. It also led to the non-reelection of Pierce and the end to the Whig party, along with the introduction of the sectional Republican party, who opposed the Kansas-Nebraska Act. An attempt at forcing slavery into

Douglas pushed the Kansas-Nebraska Bill, By opening up what had been Native American country to white settlement, Douglas hoped that the construction of a

This is when his mission started to become more and more violent. Brown published an essay instructing African Americans to stay together to resist this new law. He ordered them to even if it took killing the slave catchers, that’s what they had to do. He formed an armed resistance against the Fugitive Slave Law. Brown’s United League recruited 44 African Americans. Following this, the Kansas-Nebraska Act surfaced, which allowed settlers to decided whether or not to be free or to practice slavery. Then, in order to achieve the southern support in the 1856 Democratic presidential nomination, Stephen Douglas proposed to divide the new territory into two. This meant that Kansas, since it was in the more southern of the two territories, would be made into a slave state. This would lead to the start of an organized militia against slavery.

Acquiring the Nebraskan territory brought along its’ own set of problems for Congress. By the Union gaining these states, the balance between free and slave states was once again thrown off. Douglas once more showed up to find a sort of compromise and help his presidential campaign. He opted to repeal the Missouri Compromise restriction by giving the two new states the popular vote. He believed that these new states would not vote to be slave states and would help him further his work on the railroad. Many turned against him, viewing this as an attempt to only gain power and help his own political agenda. This act created by Douglas once again opened the topic of slavery and in response the Massachusetts Emigrant Aid Society was formed. This society was created to move free-soilers into Kansas for the vote. Along with these free-soil settlers, many Missouri slave holders had found their way to Kansas. Those from Missouri believed they needed to do anything in their power to make Kansas a slave state, even if it meant killing abolitionists. Missourians flooded Kansas twice to vote proslavery and ended up giving Kansas two governments. With Congress only sending investigators to find out more about the illegal elections, furor across the state grew rapidly. Both sides believed it to be their divine right to control Kansas. “Bleeding Kansas” began in 1856 when a

The majority of American southerners at this time were for slavery, thus Douglas’ idea of popular sovereignty and his Freeport doctrine led to southern opposition of him becoming president. But Stephen Douglas was constantly attempting to avoid war at all costs and fought for sanctity of the Union. For example, “When slavery became a divisive political issue during the Mexican War, Douglas’s romantic nationalism faced a new challenge. Fearing that the issue might disrupt the Republic, he argued for the doctrine of popular sovereignty-the right of the people of a state or territory to decide the slavery question for themselves-as a Union-saving formula” (History.com). Furthermore, it can be concluded that, through various life experiences, Douglas forms unique beliefs about slavery and thus goes on to combine the issue with politics. This combination led to the instigation of many important historical proclamations that transformed American History into a modern

The creator of the act was Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, who wanted to see citizens be able to settle in these territories. Underlying it all, Douglas’s real desire was to build a transcontinental railroad to go through Chicago. Although opposition was intense, The Kansas-Nebraska Act was finally passed by congress on May 30, 1854. It allowed settlers in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska to decide whether slavery would be legal or not within their borders based on popular sovereignty. Territory north of the 36°30' parallel was now open to popular sovereignty as Northern leaders’ moods grew darker than the midnight sky. This sudden change in affairs largely contributed to the humongous political change that was about to happen next.

At this time it seemed that the issue of slavery was the only problem in the United States, almost as if a slave was being forced down the throats of the freesoilers (Document F). Stephen Douglas drafted the Kansas-Nebraska Acts in hopes of adding two new states: Kansas and Nebraska. Although it seemed that one would be a slave state, and the other a free state, the slavery issue would be decided by popular sovereignty. Many opposed this decision but did not know how to deal with it. The reason they did not know was because the Constitution did not mention it. William Lloyd Garrison said “the Constitution which subjects them to hopeless bondage is one that we cannot swear to support” (Document E). He was trying to say that the constitution can’t answer the question of slavery because the words “slave” and “slavery” are not in the constitution.

In 1954, the Kansas- Nebraska Act was passed. Northern Democrat Steven Douglass in an attempt to build a transcontinental railroad petitioned the Kansas-Nebraska act on the bases that the Compromise of 1850 validated popular sovereignty. In Douglass’s opinion the Compromise of 1850 made the Missouri Compromise of 1820 void. There was opposition from Northern politicians who believed that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a sacred pact made by previous lawmakers during the union’s long history of compromises. For Southern politicians the Kansas- Nebraska Act would help the extension of slavery which most of the Northerners were against. Ignoring the wishes of the Northerners and pushing the Democratic agenda which wanted not only the

As a result of the tension and resentment created by the failed comprimies coupled with a weak government, the state became disunited. In 1854, the Kansas-Nebraska act established Nebraska and Kansas as territories and ultimately granted them the right to decide through popular sovereignty whether they would enter the Union as free or slaveholding states. Due to the fact that there was a balance of power between the free and the slave-holding states, the admittance of a new territory created a chance for each side to change the balance in their favor (Allard). Illinois Senator Stephen A. Douglas, a defender of the act, asserted that allowing each state to make the decision of slavery itself would ease tensions. He declared “The bill will triumph

However, blundering politicians contributed significantly to its failure. Stephen Douglas created a number of problems when he tried pass the Kansas - Nebraska Bill, although Northerners were keen to see Nebraska developed, Southerners were less enthusiastic, due to the fact that it lay north of latitude 36 30. and by the terms of the Missouri compromise all new states would eventually enter the Union as Free states. Douglas knew he needed Southern support to enable the bill to be passed in congress; this meant he would have to change the bill so that the South had a chance of expanding slavery in this area. Although in theory slavery could move Northwards, Douglas felt that due to the climate problems this was highly unlikely. Douglas, a great believer in popular sovereignty saw no problem in letting the people of Kansas - Nebraska decide their own fate. Douglas believed that in doing this he had succeeded in winning over the South without conceding much in return. However, Douglas had miscalculated the feeling in the country. Between 1854 and 1856 there were a number of issues that arose, primarily due to both sides trying to influence popular sovereignty. A significant individual error was made by President Pierce who appointed Andrew Reeder, a pro-slaver, as governor of the territory. It was obvious from that start that he was incapable of handling that situation. In the first elections pro-slavers from Missouri crossed

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was created and proposed by Democratic Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, who greatly supported the railroad system. Douglas was excited to have a railroad system that reached from his home city, Chicago, all the way to California. However, the