Once after reading the novel, The Return of Martin Guerre by Natalie Zemon Davis and the two articles, “On the Lame” by Natalie Zemon Davis and “The Refashioning of Martin Guerre” by Robert Finlay. It is evident, Bertrande was motivated by preserving her family’s honor and her own. Bertrande was on both sides during the trial because she was trying to figure out, which decision from the court case is going to benefit her family and herself the most. For example, one of the worries Bertrande has was she didn’t want her new daughter (the one she had with the fake Martin) to be a dishonor of adultery.
In the book, The Return of Martin Guerre by Natalie Zemon Davis, Davis is attempting to show us Bertrande really knew that the fake Martin wasn’t the real Martin Guerre, but she kept quiet because she knew she could lose several things. Davis mentions in the book, “The fake Martin had to recover from an illness, which led to Bertrande taking care of him. This gave Bertrande the chance to take care of him and get used to him” (Davis, The Return of Martin Guerre 42). Here it shows, Bertrande had doubts about the Martin, but she never did ask him anything
…show more content…
He says, “Coras recorded that in court Bertrande was nervous and uncertain, trembling in speech and with eyes fixed on the floor. Davis asserts, that this was all a clever act…” (Finlay 560). It is evident, Finlay doesn't believe the same interpretation Davis received from the Coras. He says, Bertrande was just worried about the outcome of the trial and how it would affect her family. Bertrande wasn't trying to pull an act. She was sincerely worried what would happen with her family's honor. Davis argues is was a clever act because Bertrande wanted to seem defenseless to the judge and if she succeeds, like she did, she would be declared non-guilty. Bertrande would just appear a hopeless woman who was also fooled by the fake
In the book “The Return of Martin Guerre,” by Zemon Davis Martin Guerre left his wife on a long journey for twelve years and then returned. While he was gone a fake man by the name of Arnaud du Tilh came and took Martin place. He came in as if nothing happened ad as if he was the “real” martin. Martin’s wife Bertrande claimed not to know that the imposter was not her husband Martin. I believed that she did know that wasn’t her husband. How can you be sexually involved with someone and not realize that is not the man you married. There is no way she didn’t know that wasn’t her husband. I think that she didn’t want to believe it because she was in love with her husband and didn’t want to question him because of the fact that she missed him.
Additionally, the book explores detailed information regarding the shift of many people at the time from Catholicism to Protestantism, which is extremely important to the development of what is occurring. Form Davis’s prospective, Bertrande really knows the truth that imposter (fake Martin) is not her true husband, but for some reasons she conceals the truth. Perhaps, she has needs needed to be stratified by one means or another since the religious system of church regarded her as an abandoned wife rather than widow because there was no evidence that proofs the husband’s death. Thus, marriage laws prevent Bertrande from receiving a divorce so that she couldn’t marry again. She was under unknown destiny because she was in between wife title
After a few years a man returns and says his name is Martin Guerre, everyone is pleased by his return. Later, a dispute over land occurs and then people start to question if this man is the real Martin Guerre or not. The case goes to court. During the trial, twelve years after Martin vanished, he returns and this time there is no denying who he is. However, there is one question that still remains, did Martin’s wife, Bertrande know about the fake Martin or was she too in the dark?
The Return of Martin Guerre, written by Natalie Zemon Davis, is the tale of a court case that takes place in sixteenth century France. Martin Guerre is a peasant who deserted his wife and family for many years. While Martin Guerre is gone, a man named Arnaud du Tilh arrives at Martin’s village and claims to be Martin Guerre. Bertrande, who is Guerre’s wife, Guerre’s sisters, and many of the villagers, accepts the imposter. After almost three years of being happily married, Bertrande takes the fraud to court under pressure of Pierre Guerre, her stepfather and Guerre’s brother. Arnaud du Tilh is almost declared innocent, but the real Martin Guerre appears in the courthouse. Throughout this tale, many factors of the peasant life are
The purpose of this paper is to introduce, discuss, and analyze the book "The Return of Martin Guerre" by Natalie Zamon Davis. Specifically, it will discuss the life of the peasant during the Middle Ages. This book is a fascinating account of a true case that happened during the 16th century in France. The book is also an excellent example of how the peasants lived in the Middle Ages, from what they ate, to how they traveled and what their family lives were like.
The main focus of the story is on Bertrande de Rols and her place in sixteenth century society, especially as a wife. At the age of nine, Bertrande was married to Martin Guerre who was a
Starters Davis is right in saying that Bertrande knew that the 1st Martin that arrived was not her husband. “When she saw him she, however she recoiled in surprise. Not until he had spoken to her affectionately, reminding her of things they had done in and talked about, specifically mentioning the white hosen in the trunk, did she fall upon his neck and kiss him;
reaction of wanting revenge. You can argue that madame defarge’s big part in the french
(pg.30) Later, he will tell the judge, without remorse, that he killed the Arab “because of the sun.” In truth, there are extenuating circumstances for his crime: the preceding scuffle with the man, the beginning of sunstroke, the lack of premeditation, the consumption of wine, the reflex action of pulling the trigger, and the defensive instinct taking over. But Meursault remains indifferent to murder, and fails to defend himself. Ironically, he is convicted as much for his psychological indifference, his selfish and anti-social behavior, and his lack of mourning for his mother, as for his actual crime. Somehow, when the prosecution was asked: “est-it accuse d’avoir enterre sa mere ou d’avoir tue un homme?” it was perfectly acceptable to assert: “j’accuse cet homme d’avoir enterre une mere avec un coeur de criminal.” (pg.47)
Upon entering his description of the Knight, Chaucer wastes no time to praise this pilgrim in every way. Not only does he note the strength and bravery that the Knight shows in his battles but also his “softer side”, where he speaks about how he “never had foul-spoken in his life”, and wears chainmail “begrimed with rust” (Chaucer 4-5). Compared to the descriptions of many of the other pilgrims, Chaucer only states positive things about this character, using no time to speak negatively about his life. Even when speaking about his “dated” clothing, he spins it around to make it sound like a positive by showing off his selflessness. Along with this, the Knights section
She is hailed as “the cleverest woman in Europe” at parlors and banquets. Yet she was rash enough to speak out against the St. Cyr family and was naïve enough to ignore the Parisian’s thirst for blood. This does not fit in with the given information that Marguerite is clever and wise. This shows that Marguerite, though intelligent and sharp, will still be ruled by her impulsive emotions, not thinking of the consequences of her actions.
The Great War, more known as World war 1 is perhaps the most famous war in American history. Most people only know that the Great war was the first world war that caused catastrophe through the worlds alliances. The Guns of August also known as August 1914 is a historical work of nonfiction written about the beginning of World War I. The Guns of August is an interesting book that goes through the first couple of months of the war. This book explains in great detail of the causes of the war like the death of Arch duke Franz Ferdinand. His death was the start of a series of stories and journals about the plans and strategies that led to war. Every detail throughout the story expressed the significance of the war and its effect on the world. Written by Barbara W. Tuchman who had been planning on writing a book on 1914 was shocked when her assistant told her about a publisher who wanted to meet with her about a novel on the great war. Barbara had become famous from of previous historical books, so much so, publishers were drawn to her. After she wrote the guns of August she then went on to write several other historical books pertaining to after the war and the effects and severity about war in general. Many years after writing the novel she had been notified that the current president had read the book and complimented her on her
War is a dangerous game, many people would likely agree to this, however, very few have ever seen a battlefront. The truth is that war, no matter how awful we can imagine it, is always exponentially worse. In Timothy Findley’s The Wars, Robert Ross, the protagonist, faces a situation that he finds difficult to come to terms with, and when faced with a similar situation later on in the novel, he must take drastic measures to reconcile the uncertainties of the past situation. Timothy Findley suggests, through the life of Robert Ross, that one’s need to reconcile the uncertainties of past experiences dominate our actions when such situations come up again in our lives. In the words of Hiram Johnson, a US Senator during the First World War,
Desiree?s words show that her life depends on the race, notions, and social class of her husband and consequently, she feels obligated to obey his every desire. Desiree is presented as vulnerable to whatever Armand wants and tells her to do when she says, ?Do you want me to go?? (177). Desiree displays through her actions that in many ways, her happiness only comes from pleasing her husband. Therefore, Desiree must decide whether to live completely separate from Armand, or to live with him in constant fear and unpleasantness. Desiree achieves personal freedom and independence from Armand when ?she disappeared among the reeds and willows that grew thing along the banks of the deep, sluggish bayou; she did not come back again? (177). It is not even an option and is unheard of that Armand, being a male holding a respectable background, could possibly be black. Consequently, Desiree feels compelled to leave because she wants to please him. When Desiree decides to kill herself and her child, she shows that she is sensitive and vulnerable to her husband?s thoughts and actions.
If someone were to ask me, "What has the government done for you today?" I would most likely say nothing, but as I researched I have looked back on my past and my present. I have realized realized that through the years I have really noticed that laws do hold a foundation on my everyday life as well as others. Laws are principles and regulations that are established under the authority of the state and/or the nation. They help to form the foundation for a country that protects and provides for its citizens.