The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

"Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by ... any … kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing ... from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree." (Cornell) First-degree murder is very clear in its definition in US law. On the fateful night of November 14, 1959, Perry Edward Smith and Richard Eugene Hickock seemed to have completely disregarded that very law when they made the decision to murder the innocent Clutter family after a planned robbery attempt and murder for cover up. Herbert and Bonnie Clutter and two of their children, Nancy and Kenyon Clutter, were brutally slain that night only for a total gain of fifty dollars for the killers. For the brutal murders of the Clutter family, Perry Smith and Richard Hickock should undoubtedly be punished by receiving the death penalty.

The death penalty also known as capital punishment ,happens when the court makes the decision to put a prisoner on death row. Soon it will be the prisoner's time to be executed. On Deathpenaltyinfo.org they show the top five execution methods. #1 is lethal injection (injecting poisons into the bodies, #2 is electrocution A.K.A the electric chair, #3 is the gas chamber, #4 is where prisoners are strapped to a chair while executioners use them to practice shooting, finally #5 is hanging but the prisoners are normally injected first.

The death penalty has been around for ages, but criticism about the death penalty is new. The has been criticism has soared to a new high because some people believe it is inhuman. In recent years debate about death penalty has risen to a new height. The pros and cons of the death penalty are being weighed in court rooms across America because of court cases killing innocent people. While the cons have noble intentions behind them for saving a human life. The pros far outweigh the cons because certain situations, the only true justice is through the death penalty. The death penalty is beneficial to America due to the cost of keeping prisoners in prison, and it is the only moral way to punish some crimes while also keeping some crimes from happening.

    The death penalty is an overkill of our society’s morality. Our humanity will be lost if we allow the death penalty. Humanity consists of our ability to have moral considerations towards life which is looking at more than just happiness that utilitarians tend to do. Innocence, being understanding, valuing people and things in life, and being virtuosic are views that keeps our humanity. There comes a time when people act off of emotions and decide to push away their morals.  Some may consider killing someone for their crime, but that makes us just as bad as them. Now, we are the killer. People have impulses that can become irrational and

Death is something that a lot of people think about, but do people think about the Death Penalty? Having been given the death penalty means that someone is going to be put to death by a lethal injection or an electric chair; There are more ways, but the injection and the electric chair are the most used. There are many different opinions surrounding the idea of death penalties; which some people think the death penalty should be used more and some believe the complete opposite.

Still today, the death penalty is a major controversy in numerous states all over the United States. It's hard to grasp the idea of putting another human to death. The death penalty is an execution style punishment which is usually used against criminal's who have committed a horrific crime. The are many arguments that the death penalty goes against the eighth amendment, which was struck down by the Supreme Court. I believe that the death penalty should be abolished everywhere in America. I think it should be abolished because it still isn't proven to deterrent future murders, it's used unfairly, and there is a risk of executing the innocent. The death penalty can be replaced with life in prison, suffering in prison for the rest of their

The death penalty has become a heavily debated topic in society, due to the uncertainty of its moral context. Supporters of the death penalty reason that those who have committed blameworthy crimes should have their lives go worse as a result of their actions. They believe in retribution. Protestors of the death penalty believe that it is counterproductive. They say that by legalizing the behavior that the law is trying to prevent, which is killing, they are being hypocritical. William Baude’s article raises the question of whether or not the death penalty is constitutional. The death penalty has plenty of ethical, legal, and moral matters associated with it. The moral dilemma of the death penalty can be viewed from deontological and utilitarian perspectives. Both theories allow the death penalty to be a morally acceptable punishment, but the difference is the reason behind each theory.

The death penalty has been the subject of controversy for many years now. Mainly for the fact that some individuals say it goes against the moral code, which is not to take the life of another human being. However, some would say that the death penalty would be fair because an individual who decides to take the life of another does not deserve a second chance at life, and should be put down. Even though there is a line drawn in the middle within the United States on whether taking a life is wrong, many can agree that an individual who takes a life most definitely deserves to stay in a jail cell. Despite opposing side about the death penalty, a compromise or solution can be made on how to deal with executions.

The ultimate question surrounding the death penalty continues to be “is it morally right?”. The death penalty is an unjust punishment and too many variables affect the decision for it to ever be truly a truly objective decision. According to the first major study conducted in the US, 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death are innocent. Death itself is one of the worst events that could happen to an individual. Being unable to enjoy the little things in life due to a mistake in the system made by the biased people running the government is unfair to anyone involved. Others may argue that the death penalty being morally unjust is a completely biased statement based on faith instead of fact. This remains invalid because the people deciding the penalties fit for the opposer are humans, and will therefore always be biased no matter how hard he/she tries.

The death penalty has become an extremely pressing issue in our culture today. Both sides of the argument make very valid points. On one side the death penalty could potentially make citizens feel more safe, and on the other hand people can argue that us as mere humans do not have the authority to “play God.” I believe the death penalty should be abolished for a variety of reasons; our government is a broken system, a proposed law would not end all murders, and we, as humans, should not have the authority to determine whether someone lives or dies.

The controversy that surrounds the use of capital punishment argues issues that surround the death penalty, but not the death penalty itself. I believe that those who sit on death row are reserved for criminals who commit the worst acts and deserve to have their life taken. These criminals should not be given a second chance, because the life that was taken did not get a second chance. Those who are given the death penalty show the result that they are a danger to society, and they shouldn’t have the possibility of hurting any more people. One could argue that justice would be served while the criminal stays behind bars, two wrongs don’t make a right, and by committing the same offense that the criminal had done while saying it’s okay to do the same only because the state says it’s acceptable. I believe that keeping the death penalty is a morally justified action and is supported by Utilitarianism and the greatest happiness principle. The death penalty is something that should only be used for brutal and premeditated crimes, because of its effectiveness to deter crime, receive retribution, and give closure for victim’s families.

The death penalty holds a crucial, conflicted place in a nation deeply divided over crime and punishment. What crimes do we as society deem as the point of no return? Casting the perpetrators to their untimely, an early demise. Many people support the death penalty blindly, though most have never bared witness to someone taking their last breaths or heard their last words. Are we as a nation as civilized as we portray ourselves, or are we just as barbaric as those we wish to purge and cleans our society from? When in many studies its proven that the death penalty does deter criminals. Does valuing life over death come with a price?

For a start, considering the issue of putting a human to death is difficult to assimilate. Although there always will be people who agree with the capital punishment and others opposed. Both groups have different, but effective points to make. The decision depends on each person’s perspective. Even though there are 32 states that still allow the capital punishment, there is no proof the death penalty deters the crime rate in those states. According to the North Carolina Department of Justice “The state murder rate has declined in the years since executed has stopped”. Also, a New York Times survey has demonstrated that the homicide rate in states with the death penalty has been 48% to 101% higher than those without the capital punishment”. The Capital punishment should be abolished because criminals have the potential to change, and innocent people can be wrongfully executed, furthermore, the death penalty is against human rights.

The death penalty has become one of the more controversial discussions in America. There are two different perspectives when it comes to this controversial subject, the pros and the cons; people in America are either against the death penalty or for it. The common saying “treat others how you wanted to be treated” plays a vital part. I truly believe if a person is big enough to kill someone on purpose and take away not only a family member but a life as well, they are big enough to face death themselves. It is important to understand that, a person who kills an innocent human being for whatever reasons there are, is taking a life. The death penalty should continue in today’s society because of three important reasons; decreasing the

“For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction”. (Newton) This begs the question if it is okay for humans to dictate the taking away of a life from a person, no matter the circumstance that is presented. Capital punishment (death) is the maximum punishment that governments have put in practice around the world. Treason, terrorism, espionage, federal murder, large-scale drug trafficking, and attempting to kill a witness, juror, or court officer in certain cases are all examples of crimes that would justify a person being put on death row. The major problem with death that comes up every couple of years is the morality of taking away a human life and in doing so what lesson does this provide to deter others from committing such