The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

"Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. Every murder perpetrated by ... any … kind of willful, deliberate, malicious, and premeditated killing ... from a premeditated design unlawfully and maliciously to effect the death of any human being other than him who is killed, is murder in the first degree." (Cornell) First-degree murder is very clear in its definition in US law. On the fateful night of November 14, 1959, Perry Edward Smith and Richard Eugene Hickock seemed to have completely disregarded that very law when they made the decision to murder the innocent Clutter family after a planned robbery attempt and murder for cover up. Herbert and Bonnie Clutter and two of their children, Nancy and Kenyon Clutter, were brutally slain that night only for a total gain of fifty dollars for the killers. For the brutal murders of the Clutter family, Perry Smith and Richard Hickock should undoubtedly be punished by receiving the death penalty.

The death penalty also known as capital punishment ,happens when the court makes the decision to put a prisoner on death row. Soon it will be the prisoner's time to be executed. On Deathpenaltyinfo.org they show the top five execution methods. #1 is lethal injection (injecting poisons into the bodies, #2 is electrocution A.K.A the electric chair, #3 is the gas chamber, #4 is where prisoners are strapped to a chair while executioners use them to practice shooting, finally #5 is hanging but the prisoners are normally injected first.

The death penalty has been battered backwards and forwards by the questions of abolishment and replacement, with mixed results. There seems to a jagged line in the sand on where people stand, and due to the continuous use today (albeit at a slower clip than in the past), it is still very much a prevalent topic of punishment. Those who argue for it believe that taking it away will take away a great deterrent, that families find peace, and that those who commit egregious crimes deserve only death. Anything less “would fail to do justice because the penalty – presumably a long period in prison – would be grossly disproportionate to the heinousness of the crime” (“Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments,” 2016). Those who don’t believe in this punishment as a modern-day, useful tool of deterrence and punishment for crime, continuously counter these arguments, as well as any others, daily at every turn. Though many states have made it illegal, others placing moratoriums or refusals to use it, the death penalty can still be found active today. But why can’t it be replaced with life without parole, and it if can why should it?

The death penalty has been around for ages, but criticism about the death penalty is new. The has been criticism has soared to a new high because some people believe it is inhuman. In recent years debate about death penalty has risen to a new height. The pros and cons of the death penalty are being weighed in court rooms across America because of court cases killing innocent people. While the cons have noble intentions behind them for saving a human life. The pros far outweigh the cons because certain situations, the only true justice is through the death penalty. The death penalty is beneficial to America due to the cost of keeping prisoners in prison, and it is the only moral way to punish some crimes while also keeping some crimes from happening.

The victim did not do anything to deserve death, the criminal did. To counter the argument that capital punishment is uncivilized, Van Den Haag points out that most civilizations have had the death penalty at some point in their history. He also addresses the argument that the death sentence is degrading by showing that philosophers, such as Immanuel Kant, have said that execution affirms the criminal’s humanity by affirming their ability to make decisions and rationalize.

The death penalty has become a heavily debated topic in society, due to the uncertainty of its moral context. Supporters of the death penalty reason that those who have committed blameworthy crimes should have their lives go worse as a result of their actions. They believe in retribution. Protestors of the death penalty believe that it is counterproductive. They say that by legalizing the behavior that the law is trying to prevent, which is killing, they are being hypocritical. William Baude’s article raises the question of whether or not the death penalty is constitutional. The death penalty has plenty of ethical, legal, and moral matters associated with it. The moral dilemma of the death penalty can be viewed from deontological and utilitarian perspectives. Both theories allow the death penalty to be a morally acceptable punishment, but the difference is the reason behind each theory.

Death penalty is when a government or state executes someone, usually but not always because they have committed a serious crime. Executions in most countries have become rarer than in recent centuries. The death penalty is a debatable and controversial topic. About one third of the countries in the world have laws that allow the death penalty. 75 countries have gotten rid of the capital punishment (death penalty) for all crimes. Most of the countries that have a death penalty law use it on murderers, and for other serious crimes such as rape or terrorism. Other countries especially ones with Authoritarian or Totalitarian governments, however, also use it for smaller crimes like theft, drugs, or for saying bad things about

The death penalty is a controversial issue that has caused some confrontational debates between opponents and supporters of this long existing sentence. In legal term, the death penalty is defined as a sentence of execution for murder and some other capital crimes. In support of death penalty, Koch, Edward, Ex- mayor of New York argues in his article “Death and Justice: How capital Punishment affirms Life” that “Life is indeed precious, and I believe the death penalty helps to affirm this fact. Had the death penalty been a real possibility in the minds of these murderers, they might well have stayed their hand” (Koch, 484). On the other hand, Bruck, David, clinical professor of law and a stanish opponent of capital punishment asserts in his article “ Death Penalty” that “neither justice nor self-preservation demands that we kill men whom we have already imprisoned” (Bruck, 493).

Prisons also cost a great deal of money to run and maintain and it is

My position respect Death penalty was tending to pro death. After my research my position changed based in process cost, constitutionality, morality and a better understanding about retribution. We as a part of the knowledge of law should be on both sides of the case to have a better point of view. In order, to have the right of taking the correct decision of life or death of an individual life. In conclusion, life in prison is a worse punishment than end it soon with the death penalty. Ernest Van Den Haag, PhD, in his article titled "For the Death Penalty," wrote the following: "Common sense tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less feared." (Van Den Haag, 1983) I disagree with Van Den Haag, life in prison it is hard, these individuals fight

Nancy Reagan, once said, “I think people would be alive today if there were a death penalty.” The death penalty needs to be looked at, reviewed, revised, and kept. There are flaws in the system, but every system has flaws. Keeping the death penalty will show criminals that their are consequences to the crimes they commit. By executing a murderer it could save countless lives. There are many reasons someone might be executed and these reasons are looked at carefully.There are different types of execution: hanging, lethal injection, firing squad, electrocution, and lethal gas. The death penalty should stay but be revised, it could save lives, it could prevent crimes, it could prevent overcrowding in prisons, and closure for the family and friends who lost their loved ones from heinous crimes.

“I don’t think you should support the death penalty to seek revenge. I don’t think thats right. I think the reason to support the death penalty is because it saves other people’s lives.” George W. Bush. The death penalty is a very debatable topic, both sides seeing two different views of putting people to death because of crimes they committed. People who are for the death penalty have an opinion that someone killed someone and they should be killed because it could save more lives, or that they put someone through that so they should be put through it. The other side sees it and they know that it costs less to keep them alive then to kill them, and that they don’t want their families to suffer because their loved one was executed. Both of these opinions are very valid and you cannot say one is correct and the other is wrong or vice versa, but many more variables come into effect with this topic.

The death penalty is a punishment a person receives when convicted of a capital crime. In the U.S. there are thirty-two states who are supporters of the death penalty (States With and Without the Death Penalty). Many people believe that the entire United States should have these punishments available. A criminal should be punished if he or she deserves it. For example, Ronnie Gardner, who killed a lawyer, was executed by a firing squad. The article 5 Arguments For And Against The Death Penalty states that ¨In the U.S,

The death penalty is a form of punishment that is not used as often as one may think. Even though most of the American population is not personally affected by the death penalty, the friends and families of victims see it as a form of justice for their lost loved ones. From 1976 to the present there have been over 1,400 inmates executed after being put on death row (Baker, 1). The death penalty is an expensive style of punishment, costing around 470,000 dollars more in cases that consider capital punishment as an option compared to the cases that do not (Erb, 1). With most of that extra cost being paid by state taxes, there are other government funded programs that would experience a loss of support if the death penalty is used frequently. The U.S. National Government should ban the death penalty for economical reasons.

Everyday an inmate is taken to death row, or the punishment is threatened. Consequently, over half of the United States carry out one of the five main methods of execution - the most common being lethal injection. The approximate number of states using the death penalty is thirty-one (“What’s New”) As of October 25, 2017, there were eight executions still in progress before the end of the year - twenty-one executions have already been carried out in the year 2017 (“What’s New”). Every year less death penalties take place; however, lethal injection is an unethical method, and is a practice of humiliation. The death penalty is an unconstitutional and immoral punishment that should be banned in all states as a use of penalization.