World War II caused millions of deaths, civilian and otherwise. The death toll could have been much higher if the atomic bombs were not dropped. The United States made the correct decision to drop the atomic bombs. If the U.S. had not dropped these bombs the war could have carried on for years and taken millions more lives. If an invasion of Japan had taken place it would have likely taken years and millions of soldiers to cause surrender. No one wanted to prolong the war or cause more deaths than necessary, if the bombs had not been dropped history would likely be completely different.
One of the largest and most supported benefit of the atomic bombs was that it would be a speedy end to the war. With VE day war had ended in Europe and everyone was tired of fighting, especially long distances from home. The bombs caused total and utter surrender of Japan. Tokyo and many other Japanese cities had been firebombed for months before the bombs were dropped. Firebombing caused thousands of deaths and was a slow process of attempting to break their will to fight. The U.S. also planned to cut off supplies and food to the cities and main island. With the atomic bombs dropped
…show more content…
Many agree Japan and its involvement in WWII had created total war, as a result of their willingness to use and kill civilians. Total war called for the U.S. to overlook the civilian causalities in order to end the war faster which would actually save lives. Even though Hiroshima and Nagasaki were cities filled with many civilians, they were actually key military targets because of their industrial significance. The U.S. also relied on the bombs to create panic and total destruction of their government, the bombs instilled fear. They were meant to cause surrender and not death. Death was just a collateral effect of total
One may argue the atomic bomb dropped on Japan ended the war, saved lives, and saved a small amount of money by not going to waste. The two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Iwo Jima overall ended the war by forcing Japan to surrender. “For Americans in uniform and those who waited for them to come home, outrageous as this might appear from the moral heights of hindsight, it was a sunburst of deliverance.” (Doc 13) Lester Bernstein gave examples of the alleviation felt once the war ended. Although many were relieved, the act of dropping the bomb was completely barbaric.
The fatal atomic bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the end of World War II are written down in history books today. This is because they had a drastic story behind them that changed the world and the lives of many civilians. The United States decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II had both positive and negative results.
The atomic bomb was seen as a weapon capable of ending the war, and it did just that. Due to its quick and magnificent destruction capabilities, the United States could avoid hand to hand combat and save the lives of many Americans. On the other hand, the bombs were seen as unnecessarily brutal. Because of its lethal range, hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed.
On August 6, 1945, the U.S. dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. To this day there is controversy on whether the U.S. should have risked the lives of hundreds of thousands of people to win the second world war. The U.S. Should have considered other options before dropping the bomb on Hiroshima. There were many alternative actions that could have taken place instead of dropping the bomb, but President Truman decided that using it was the best way to get the Japanese to surrender. If he would have chosen differently, the world would be a different place today.
Whether the use of the atomic bomb on Japan during World War II was justified, we will never know. However, the amount of time spent on discussing the use and effect of the bomb seems to be nonexistent. If they talked about the bomb there was no major argument against using the bomb; with that came mystery because they did not understand the bomb. There were factors that they used as an excuse to use the bomb, but these were in the background and later added to make the argument seem more one-sided, in their favor. Whether the use of the atomic bomb proved helpful or not is up to debate. The atomic bomb changed the world, and given the evidence, the use of the bomb was not talked about in detail except for when and where to use it.
The atomic bombs might have killed thousands, but the bombs also saved millions. Before the war even started Japan had a grudge on America for cutting off of their oil supplies. Germany lost to the allies after hitter committed suicide. Japan was the last remain axis power. When Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, America had a right to join the war and get revenge. When America dropped the bombs, they did their best not to harm many civilians. Also they saved more lives than they took. The atomic bomb was the best way toned the war efficiently.
Many of us are taught in our early history classes that the use of the bombs was solely to bring a swift end to the war, but it was far more complicated than that. Under Japan's long-practiced doctrine of Bushido, a code of honor and morals developed by the samurai, America was looking at a direr, drawn-out conflict. This is important to know in the war because by this code the Japanese fought under the notion that they would never surrender. It seems simple but it had its effect on the U.S. military (in terms of morale) and the Japanese people. While our forces were island hopping, the inhabitants of those islands were conditioned by the Japanese military to believe that the American invaders would eat their children, or commit other heinously unspeakable acts, and
The atomic bombs decreased the war time that was going to be fought if they weren’t created. The atomic bombs caused so much destruction, making the decision easier for Japan to surrender. “ ‘After the first minute of dropping “Fat Man,” 39,000 men, women and children were killed. 25,000 more were injured.
Yes there were a lot of casualties due to the dropping of the atomic bombs. But in hinesight those casualties were very minimal compared to what would have happened. Nonetheless, I also believe that President Harry Truman’s decision to use the atomic bombs against Japan almost certainly saved lives. This is undoubtedly true if one accepts the arguments of U.S. leaders at the time; namely, that not using the atomic bomb would have forced the U.S. to launch a full invasion of Japan’s home islands, and this would have killed far more people than Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I think it was necessary to drop the atomic bomb to end World War II because it would end the war earlier and stop the potential deaths of hundreds of thousands. Although critics state that the estimated casualties of the home island invasion are exaggerated, I do not agree with their assessment. Japan had millions of troops on the home islands along with millions of potentially armed civilians. The Japanese had a sheer devotion to their homeland and they were willing to fight to the death. Along with the invasion of Okinawa and its high casualty count, the invasion of Japan would create an enormous amount of death for both sides. In addition to the bombing of civilian targets, prolonging the war would definitely result in a higher death count.
In August 1945 president Harry Truman dropped the first atomic bomb on Japan. There are many sides in which people have taken that either support or go against this decision. If I were Harry Truman and I was given the decision on whether the atomic bomb should be dropped I would NOT have dropped the bomb on Japan. This decision I have made comes from a Christian view point. While reading the letter sent from Samuel McCrea Cravert to Harry S. Truman I developed the opinion that America was attempting to fight fire with fire.
The release of two atomic bombs on Japan in August 1945 helped end World War II. However, it had unintended consequences. It caused the conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union.
World War 2 was one of the worst wars in world history. The allied forces, the U.S., France, China, Russia, and Great Britain, were at war against the axis powers, Germany, Italy, and Japan, to stop the nazis from taking over the world. There were many bad events and battles that happened over the 6 year time span of the war; but one of the worst has to be the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings at the end of the war. Some people say that the U.S. Needed to drop the bombs to save American and Japanese lives. Some think otherwise, that the bombs were not nessecary to end the war. Even the scientists who created the bombs believed it shouldn't have been used. Once the bomb was created, there was controversy
President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the direct cause for the end of World War II in the Pacific. The United States felt it was necessary to drop the atomic bombs on these two cities or it would suffer more casualties. Not only could the lives of many soldiers have been taken, but possibly the lives of many innocent Americans. The United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means taking lives of another countries innocent civilians.
Although dropping the Atomic Bomb was detrimental to a group of Japanese citizens, it saved many American lives and ultimately ended the war. If the American Army tried to make a land attack against the Japanese they would have lost many American lives, and possibly many more Japanese lives. And there would have been a possibility of many more years of fighting. Also the Japanese were given fair warning, on July 26 the Japanese were given the chance to surrender known as the Potsdam Declaration. Even though many people see the dropping of the Atomic bomb as a good thing, many people were against it because it cost many civilians their lives.