The Pros And Cons Of Reproductive Cloning

The 21st century however forecasts an astonishing increase in innovation in another direction. While previously overshadowed by its larger cousins, physics and chemistry, it seems likely that the biological sciences will steal the limelight in the future. Mapping the genome, reversing the aging process, and finding a cure for terminal illnesses, all represent primary objectives for science. Unfortunately, the ethical questions posed by innovations in biomedicine are far greater than those posed by advances in the physical sciences. Reproductive cloning is one of these innovations, and one that arguably poses the greatest threat to the world as we know it. The universal truth, blindly accepted by man for millennia, held that a human could only be born through the sexual union of a male and a female, to be exact, of an egg and a sperm. By cloning, however, a human life can be created in the laboratory. This is done by taking human DNA and inserting it into an egg cell, sans genetic material. The resultant cell is identical to the original, and can then be inserted into a uterus, either a human or an animal one, and be grown to term, to produce a baby, while circumventing nature’s means of reproduction.

There have been recent studies on animals where the scientist cloned the animals. Cloning is something many people are split on. Some say it is bad some say it is good. I think cloning is a bad thing. Cloning can be a bad thing in many ways. I will be covering some of those ways in this paper.

Cloning is a number of processes that are used to create genetically identical copies of an organism. Researchers have cloned a number of biological materials, such as genes, cells, tissues and whole organisms, including sheep 's and horses. Cloning can happen naturally in identical twins, but it can also be done in a lab. ("Cloning Fact Sheet").

The topic of cloning has been a science fiction legend until Dolly, the first cloned mammal, was born in the late 1990s. Dolly’s cloning renewed the interest in the potential of human cloning as seen in science fiction. Cloning has been done since the 1950s, but every cloning experiment included problems. When cloning mice, researches can use thousands of eggs to fix errors, but human cloning cannot use the same knowledge learned from cloning cows. With human cloning there is an “…extremely high rate of death…” and chance of abnormalities that cause the ethical concern for cloning humans (Rettner).

Therapeutic and rReproductive cloning can change the world, in not just one, but many other ways. Cloning can help countries and it would make the U.S not just a good state, but a better countrystate. Tax payer money should fund cloning, because it can replace damaged organs, produce livestock for the countries that are in need, and also help couples that can’t have children.

Imagine a world with only clones, where not one person was unique, and where armies are just clones. Cloning should not be allowed to happen as people will not have anything unique about themselves, and it doesn’t only apply to people, it also applies to animals. People want to clone animals to have their beloved pets back, but they don't realize that the animals will only look the same physically, not mentally, and by that I mean that those pets will not have the memories of the original pet, which also applies to humans. And while cloning can bring benefits through research, it is morally wrong. Cloning, human or animal, is not right and it should not be allowed to happens as it takes away uniqueness. We also definitely should not allow our taxes to go to cloning because it is morally wrong as it can be used for bad things from selling them on the black market, to letting parents decide how their children will turn out, and maybe, even an army of clones.

This page discusses how philosophers come up with persuasive reasons to allow or prohibit human reproductive cloning. Some philosophers agree that local and temporary, it should implement the relevant cloning forgiveness, which should be rejected. Production or analysis in some of the main arguments put forward by philosopher cloning debate, as well as some of their most important no convincing arguments against universal opposition philosophers of different kinds of human cloning. This. Conflict between the school of thought suggests that philosophers can not be trusted to provide the public agency, or the general public, human reproductive cloning of moral unity, universal point of

The dangers that arise from reproductive cloning are numerous, and are enough to validate the banning of human reproductive cloning altogether. During mammalian reproductive cloning, a large proportion of clones suffered from weakened immune systems, which greatly compromised the animal’s ability to fight off infection, disease, and other disorders. “Animal experiments in cloning all indicate that a cloned twin is at high risk of congenital defects, multiple health problems and perhaps a greatly shortened life span.” (Paulson) In addition, many of the offspring produced through cloning suffer massive abnormalities, such as missing or deformed organs. Approximately 30% of offspring are diagnosed with “large offspring syndrome” and other debilitating conditions. In fact, studies on reproductive cloning have shown that more than 90% of

Essay Question (2): Explain in full the ‘life in the shadow’ argument against human reproductive cloning. How might the argument be objected to? Do you regard the argument to be morally decisive, in the sense that it establishes that human cloning for purely reproductive purposes must never be permitted? Explain and defend your answer.

Scientific experimentation has led us to many great discoveries such as: Chemotherapy, heart surgery, and bone marrow transplants. Recently scientists have discovered a new way to heal humans. This is known as cloning. Although they have yet to clone a human they have cloned sheep. Cloning has brought up a huge controversy among the American people. There are two sides to the story. Either you agree with cloning or you don’t. The only way to help make that decision is to look at the good and bad points of cloning.

Recently cloning is becoming more and more popular topic. It is puzzling and intriguing. On one hand it seems to be frightening, but on the other hand it is evolutionary. As a new branch of medicine, cloning technology needs to be developed even more, because cloning is beneficial for developing the knowledge of humankind. Scientists need huge effort in order to clone. They need to know every single cell of the body, its function, and construction. By gaining that knowledge, they will know every aspect of an organism. Cloning is a perfect method to discover new treatments for incurably sick people.

In measuring the benefits, human reproductive cloning would be advantageous to the well-being of humans and because it is a fulfillment of personal autonomy. Firstly, this technique is a sound method for infertile couples to have a genetically related ‘child’ and it is a method to provide a patient medical treatment in a form of gene therapy or organ transplants (Hayry 2003). Secondly, the value of personal self-governance has been emphasized by human traditions in which the liberty of individuals is seen as important to individuals in our society today. Cloning would promote the well-being of some individuals without violating any person’s autonomy and conclusively is rational that people’s reproductive choice is not a realm to be interfered.

Cloning is defined as “a number of different processes that can be used to produce genetically identical copies of a biological entity” (Cloning Fact Sheet). Cloning is basically just creating an exact copy of another organism. Cloning is actually a natural occurrence in for some organisms. Cloning occurs naturally in “some plants and single-celled organisms, such as bacteria, produce genetically identical offspring through a process called asexual reproduction” (Cloning Fact Sheet). Less complex organisms reproduce without the aid of a partner which makes the offspring an exact copy of the parent. Scientists have become interested in the process of cloning and want to be able to clone anything. So far, scientists have developed “three different types of artificial cloning: gene cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning” (Cloning Fact Sheet). Scientists have discovered three different ways to clone organisms as of right now. Gene cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning are similar yet different. According to the

I am Arianna Hernandez and I would like to discuss the topic in cloning.There are a articles stating that human cloning is a terrible idea and the negative effects that come with it. As well as against, there are some articles state that human cloning is a great idea and that we should make continue with the cloning. Saying at how it would be beneficial to the society. There are a whole lot of evidence saying otherwise. The articles that I would be writing about will be “Arguments For and Against Creating Human Clones.” As well as “President Bush Calls on Senate to Back Human Cloning Ban”, and even “What Ever Happened to Cloning?” The last article that I would be using would be “All Reasons to CLone Human Beings,” to show you all of the benefits that is has. Cloning humans should not be allowed because it isn’t the best idea.

Cloning can be defined as the process by which individuals identical to an adult organism are obtained asexually. With the recent techniques of cloning, science has succeeded in obviating that cloning could be possible. Science has contributed to easing of humans’ problems since its proper understanding in the early 19th century. Without scientific discoveries and breakthroughs the world we see today, the technological advancements, couldn’t have been possible. One of the outcomes of the science that have increased the chances of survival of mankind of this planet is the cloning. Fertilization appeared to be science fiction-such as the creation of new sexed individuals outside the realm of sexuality, with no fusion of gametes has been demonstrated as a certifiable reality. To this day, only sheep, mice, cows, goats and pigs has been cloned. In animals, the first ever example of successful cloning appeared in the form of Dolly Sheep, that was a clone produced by Dr. Keith Campbell of Scotland in 1997 using nucleus from cultured cells of an older sheep. Due to the use of older sheep’s nucleus, Dolly survived only for six years and died in 2003.