preview

The Pros And Cons Of Physical Castration

Better Essays

The issue of whether sex offenders should be chemically or physically castrated has been one that has sparked much debate over the years. There are many people who believe, apart from murder or treason, that sexual abuse is one of the worst crimes that a person can commit against another. In these circumstances, many have voiced the proposition that such an offender, especially when they are repeat offenders, be punished in the harshest way allowed. Apart from the obvious jail term, the extra punishment would be either surgical or chemical castration (Beech & Grubin, 2010). Castration has two ways that it can be done: surgical and chemical. Surgical castration involves the removal of the testes and chemical castration uses hormones to drastically reduce the testosterone levels in …show more content…

The same way I do not believe in the death penalty, I do not believe that the mandatory castration of offenders is morally or ethically correct. We can eliminate castration in a few simple ways. For example, eliminating some reasons that you can be castrated for such as being a first time offender or being a non-violent offender as long as it does not involve a minor. Imposing harder sentences for all sex offenders meaning there are no “pats on the wrist” or community service chances. If you offend, you must serve a lengthy sentence. Also, once an offender is in prison, they would not be allowed an early release or any form of sentence reductions, and last but not least, make it so that it is VOLUNTARY in all states, after a medical and mental health evaluation...not mandatory. Some offenders will never be able to fully control their urges and if they are of capable mind, they should be able to opt for castration to help keep them out of trouble and out of

Get Access