With more and more people starting to get fed up with all of the gun control laws, the question is, should gun control laws become more lenient or should they become more strict? First point is that people kill people not the guns. Second, people should be able to use guns as they like without breaking the law plus the gun control laws don’t deter crime. Last, if guns are getting taken away then other things should be taken away too that some may not even think about.Many people think that they should be more lenient and that is a very valid side of the story. There are people who say that gun control laws should be raised because of all of the school shooting that are starting to happen. The people should not sell guns as loose as the do now, but if people would really think about it, gun control has been the same for many years and before school shootings got popular that never happened. Another reason why gun control should …show more content…
A Nov. 26, 2013 study found that, between 1980 and 2009, Lott states, "assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level" and "states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders." While gun ownership doubled in the twentieth century, the murder rate decreased. Another things is that states with the largest amount of people owning a gun have seen decreases in violent crimes. This is because people have the guns to protect themself and a criminal normally doesn't want to get into a gun fight with someone. Once the law was passed that people could own a gun, multiple-victim shooting have declined about 84% in those states.(Pro&Con Arguments) Gun control laws are also taking away people's safety. Say a criminal walks into a person's house with a gun and the other person doesn't because it is against the law, is it fair ,to be in that situation without something to protect
Gun control laws should be strictly enforced because individuals can take advantage of the relaxed enforcement and harm others.
The article “Gun Control Laws: Should the United States adopt stronger gun control laws?” focuses on the debate on passing stricter gun control laws. For example, supporters believe that gun control laws will decrease mass shootings and gun violence. Additionally, adopting these laws does not violate the Second Amendment, and as a result it does not limit the government from the use of fire arms when it is necessary. However, opponents argue that the gun control laws will not stop gun violence. The problem is the people holding the gun and not the gun itself. Furthermore, opponents gathered that stronger gun control laws do violate the Second Amendment. The author illustrates the debate on whether the United States should or should not adopt stronger gun control laws.
What gun control laws are going to help stop mass shootings? Even if the government banned the sale of assault rifles and guns in general,people with bad intentions are going to purchase them illegally. In the three recent mass shooting that caused many deaths, the shooters got their guns illegally with no trace of the sale on these weapons. Sandy Hook,Columbine,and San Bernardino were all mass shootings where the shooters got their guns illegally, stole the gun from family members or other people, and caused a lot of danger and harm to people. There would be no regulations to stop them because even if there were stricter gun laws, they still would be able to purchase their guns illegally.Stricter gun laws will not prevent crime,people will still get illegal firearms,and no sales to the public will reduce revenue.
Following the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, lawmakers have begun reconsidering the gun laws that are currently in place. Many states have previously implemented “red flag laws” (Johnson 2). However, after the recent events, lawmakers are debating on whether or not those laws are enough. Of course, to most people, stronger gun control laws seems like an obvious decision, but it is not that easy. Gun control laws are complicated. It is a “balancing act in the United States between public safety and the right to bear arms” (Mueller 2). Lawmakers must carefully balance the safety and constitutional rights of citizens. This is difficult to do when everyone has different values and points of view.
We should have stricter gun control laws because there would be less shootings and gun deaths with gun control. Gun control laws would mean you would have to get a background check and meet some requirements before you can get a gun in your hands. There was a mass shooting in Vegas at Jason Aldean concert. Gun control makes the people feel
Gun control laws also do not take into consideration how gun owners can and have stopped criminals with guns and thus preventing crime. This is why there are some that instead of just advocating for their right to own guns they encourage more people to own guns as their way to fight gun violence. Their main argument being that criminals with guns only target those who are not armed. Although people perceive owning a gun, at least in the house, as a safety measure, the rate of gun ownership has stayed relatively stable over the past few
Many think that if gun control laws were put into place then it will save lives. However that is not exactly true. Handguns purchases should not be limited. “Most handguns used in crimes are stolen and passed frequently from criminal to criminal or purchased not by mass gun buyers but by a friend or relation-which would not be affected by ‘one handgun a month’.” By limiting the purchase of handguns, it will not save people from killing others. Either way with or without gun control laws, people are going to steal guns to kill. Concealed guns should be allowed. “‘Shall Issue’ concealed carry laws, which allow ANY law abiding citizen to carry a concealed pistol, have spread to 40 states across the US since 1987. Millions of ‘average’ Americans exercise this right, and there have been no explosions of crime, shootouts over parking spots, or road rage gunfights.” People throughout the years have carried a handgun, and it has not been a problem yet. Therefor, why change it if it is not a problem. With more guns does not mean more accidental shootings. “But it is a fact that gun accidents have reduced in a number much faster than gun ownership has increased. And in every household there are dangerous items- household cleaners, swimming pools, and other items that cause many more accidental deaths than guns….” There are more than guns that are dangerous, but nobody is going to take them away due to their enjoyment of it. Why not make laws about swimming pools or household cleaners? An abundant amount of people think that most deaths are caused by guns, and that’s why they want gun control laws
I agree that guns control should be controlled in order for a safer community. There should be more restrictive gun laws for three main reasons, school shootings, domestic violence, and the effectiveness of stricter gun control laws in various areas. To begin with, school
Gun control laws are not always effective and that is why each year they are improving them and making them to where they can be more effective. One of the laws that was the most effective was the Brady act which required all individuals that were interested in owning a gun to have a background check that was implemented by the federal government (Kwon, & Baack, 2005). This act has had a very positive impact on the crimes rates and has helped protect our society. There are many articles that show that with stricter gun laws being implemented that there are a decrease in crimes being committed throughout the United Stares (Kwon, & Baack, 2005). Studies show that countries who have low gun ownership have fewer gun related deaths. In reality if
Just because there have been a few shootings recently does not mean that we should control guns more. That is punishing everyone for the actions of a few people. The United States is a place of freedom and safety. Gun control goes against both of these traits. We cannot live in fear of guns.
There are many controversial argument about whether to be for gun control or whether to be against gun control, I personally think that gun control should be even more strict then it is right now. The Federal Law prohibits certain groups of people to possess a firearm. Those people include illegal immigrants, convicted felons, and people that are diagnosed with certain types of mental diseases. President Obama announced that he is expanding the amount of background checks for gun buyers. Having gun control can lessen the amount of homicides and gun related deaths. There are many debates about gun control, but the main issue is carrying out and supporting the laws.
How many times have you heard on the news about another shooting? Too many times! Having gun laws is something that a lot of people disagree and argue about. I think there should be more gun control laws for fewer deaths and safety reasons.
While some people think gun control is necessary the U.S.A does not need it while some, think that gun control laws should be more strict because they think that guns are the problem with all the crimes going on.
Gun control has become more of a hot topic in recent years. Some believe that there is no need for additional gun control. On the other hand, we have some that believe that the government can improve gun laws. Although many believe that gun control will violate their rights, the idea of stricter gun control laws can help communities.
Individuals have the right to defend themselves. There are too many gun control laws – additional laws will not lower gun crime rates. What is needed is enforcement of current laws. Gun control laws do not prevent criminals from obtaining guns there are guns and if criminals need them they will get them, just as if I need food or water I will get them even if that means stealing. More guns in the hands of law abiding citizens means less crime if I have a gun someone will not try to rob me because they know that if they try I will protect myself at my thing.