preview

The Pros And Cons Of A Primary Election System

Decent Essays

A primary election is where voters in each state votes for a presidential candidate by

political party. For instance, if you are a registered Democrat within your county, then you only

vote for one democrat candidate in the primary. According the Greenberg book, the primary

system is a “related trend has involved more direct elections of government officials, replacing

the old indirect methods” (Greenberg 2014, pg. 286). This system is still used today to create a

direct approach to determine which candidate from each party officially won in one state, in

which a state that pledge to a specific candidate from each political party. For example, one

recent official pledge for the 2016 presidential election was in Iowa, in which Cruz won for the

Republicans in that state. Again, these …show more content…

But in today’s system, there is such thing a ‘party caucuses’, or

“selection of delegates to national party conventions by city or countywide meetings by party”

(Greenberg 2014, pg. 287). This will enhance democracy, but it is sometimes an un-democratic

Lee 2 feature. So do we think that it is a good system? Because most politicians usually never listen and

continuously debating, thus creating delays for a solution, I basically have no opinion on that.

However, June primaries are official elimination round, in which one candidate from each party

will run for the November election, so I think that the primary system breaks down to several

candidates into one for each party. Ultimately, the primary system is to create a two party

election, whether it is countywide, statewide, or nationwide, “created a major success in the

struggle for democracy” (Greenberg 2014, pg. 287). Problems do remain at the polls and also

while processing votes in the county seat, in which can create unexpected official

Get Access