preview

The Praise Of Folly: Protestant Reformation

Decent Essays

The Renaissance in Italy is a time of enlightenment and on of the most influential times in our history. The Renaissance is also iconic for the corruption of the Roman Catholic Church and its officials. One of the foundations of the church is the concept of miracles, which seems to disappear during the era of the Renaissance. There can be an array of reasons that contribute to the lack of these miracles in European Renaissance society. Miracles are usually performed by God, Jesus or the people of the Catholic Church but the uproar of relics takes this power away from the people of the church and gives it to these objects. With the corruption of the Catholic Church, the Protestant Reformation, and Renaissance mentalities the church takes focus …show more content…

Other than the corruption that Savonarola points of and Ippolito emulates, Erasmus is one of the top names in church reform attempts. Erasmus uses indirect criticism of the church through characters in his writing. One of these is Folly in his work, The Praise of Folly. Here Erasmus uses the idea of Folly, the fool in court, to depict who the fool associates with. One of the main critiques is of church officials and the overall church system. Erasmus rants about the role of the Pope in the church for pages, stating:
“Then the supreme pontiffs, who are the vicars of Christ: if they made an attempt to imitate his life of poverty and toil, his teaching, cross, and contempt for life, and thought about their name of "pope", which means "father", or their title of "Supreme Holiness", what creatures on earth would be so cast down . . . Think of all the advantages they would lose if they ever showed a sign of wisdom! Wisdom, did I say . . . In place of all this it would bring vigils, fasts, tears, prayers, sermons, study, sighs, and a thousand unpleasant hardships of that kind. Nor must we overlook what this will lead to. Countless scribes, copyists, clerks, lawyers, advocates, secretaries, muleteers, grooms, bankers, and …show more content…

Anything can be considered a relic because “old” is relative and “sentimental” is subjective. Writer Emily Bronte comments on the concept of relics saying, ”any relic of the dead is precious, if they were valued by the living.” Except this term is now forever connected to religion because of the church. Different artifacts that were own or touched by religious figures can be considered relics. The Arc of the Covenant or the Holy Grail are prime (unfound) examples, each claiming to contain magical or mystical powers. Relics are the new form of indulgences for Christianity; they did not replace indulgences, but they just became a new method. The church became brought in major income from these relics . Relics lined churches and brought in masses of followers by claiming that bones sitting near the alter belonged to a saint or a piece of cloth belonged to Jesus. The church would sell license for individuals to sell relics, giving the church a large income but hypocritically would claim that the action of selling relics is fraud. The church used this as new source of entertainment and income, bringing more people to the church. It is even said that one of the major kinds of relics sold is that of pieces of wood, claiming they were a part of the crucifix that Jesus was executed on. Plus, more conspiracies spread that if you want to see the

Get Access