"The Pelican Brief" Novel vs. Movie
The differences and the similarities between the novel "The Pelican Brief" by John Grisham and the movie "The Pelican Brief" by Alan J. Pakula film. There were maybe similarities between the novel and the movie. The story line and plot were basically the same in both the novel and the movie. Then there were also many differences when the novel was made in to a movie. As in most cases when a novel is made in to a movie there are certain things that are left out in the movie version.
The novel and the movie were both very suspenseful. The main characters are both the same in the book and in the movie but are a little bit different then their counter partners in the novel/movie. In both the movie and
…show more content…
The scene in the novel where all the porno cinemas were bombed and burned to the ground was somewhat important in the fact that it showed to state of anarchy our country is in, in this novel. The movie neglected to use that scene in to the movie version of "The Pelican Brief." The burning down of the porno cinemas gave an example and showed how the "Underground Military" worked. This in a sense excluded them from the list of suspects do to there expert use of explosives. If they had indeed were the killers of the two Chief Justices they most likely would of stuck to there area of expertise, explosives. The main difference between the novel and the movie is that in the novel you are introduced to more characters and there involvement in the story is explained. The movie doesn't really introduce u as well as the novel does and this makes it harder to follow what is going on in the movie version. It is harder in a movie to introduce a character but it seemed that it was poorly don in "The Pelican Brief" movie version. I can understand why its easer for a novel to describe how and what they what you to know about a particular character. Now in a movie it's your own perception that you make of a character.
The perception that the novel is usually better than the movie version in this case is true; I preferred reading the novel over watching the movie. The novel
Comparing the book to the movie you can clearly tell what certain things are different. For example, Sydelle Pulaski worked for Mr. Westing in the movie but only talked over the intercom. This not only caused a lot of drama but more depth to the plot. Also, Crow didn’t go to jail but they did talk about most of the consequences of her going to jail. This made a little bit more serious and emotional instead of just letting it go.
The first similarity and difference I found was In the movie was that there is a witch in the movie and no witch in the book. Along with this, there is a friend of Kino’s who dies. This is important to the story because he was the man who was going to sail with Kino to the capital. Overall, the characters in the movie that weren’t in the book affected the plot. One
Finally, between the book and the movie I really liked the book better even tho I don't like to read i thought it was better.Because the book had more detail than the movie did in my opinion. The movie was more sad because you actually saw them and what they were doing. In the book you would have to imagine it and it wouldn't be as sad. Overall the movie and book were good but very
I like the book better than the movie. I like the book better because I could decide what a scene would look like. For example, in the book, it describes True Son. It says, “The boy wore a brand-new calico hunting shirt. It covered the boy’s upper parts and halfway down his leggings. His hair was black and his face and arms brown as an Indian, but you couldn’t mistake the English cast of his features.” I could make up in my mind how I wanted True Son to look. In the movie, I saw what was on the screen, and couldn’t make the scene look how I wanted it
But which one is better? I'll be talking about the features of the character traits, settings, and plot of both the book and movie, to show which one is better. In my opinion, I like the book better and here are the reasons why. To begin, I'm going to be talking about the characteristics of both the book and the movie. In the book, the characteristics and their traits were put in very good detail.
I much preferred the movie version to the novel. For me, author William Kennedy’s style of writing is needlessly vague and difficult to follow, yet he did a wonderful job adapting
I think the movie is better than the book because it’s more visual, has more action, and has props.
I prefer the movie over the book because,it shares more detail.The book does not share the way they look but only gives us away to guess what they look like.The movie
The book and the movie characters are the same. The movie is easier to understand because the viewers can see what the characters look like and how they deal with the pain. While in book you have to read about how they feel about the situation.
In addition it got confusing on who was talking. Also, it showed more than the book did. The movie was easier to see who was talking. Therefore the movie showed more than the book by the different points of view that were shown. Those are the reasons why I think the movie is better than the
There are many publishers in the world who decide to take their work and turn it into films. Although many viewers may think the film should be exactly like the book, they are not. In both novel and book there are going to be slight differences. The moral of both novel and book is the same; however, their narrators are different. The character may act a certain way as one are reading, then act another way as one watch the film.
Despite having many differences the film remains faithful in capturing the novel and putting on film. While one may not get everything from the movie as from the book, the majority of it is there. So for die hard fans of the book there is no need for disappointment. All the main parts of the book are there, the characters, the plot, the setting
I feel that as a reader they could tell me how he felt compared to showing me how he felt. The actor in the movie really showed me how he felt and in the book told me how he felt. The actor in the movie really showed the emotion and determination to get home to his family again,this was shown so well to me I felt like I was in the same situation,all the horrible things that happened to him happened to me.The examples were the reason I felt the book and the movie were different.
The book and movie are completely different. It 's like comparing apples and oranges. (I 'm assuming that you used the newest version with Guy Pierce). The biggest difference is probably the ommision of Haydee and Maximillien and Valentine (three of the main character) and the addition of Jacapo. Jacapo does is in the book, but he is never a large character.
The Plot does not really have any differences in the movie from the book. The only real