The One-Child Policy In China

CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE 1. The one-child policy introduced by China has been debated whether or not it was necessary. China instated the new policy to control population growth in 1980. The one child policy was introduced to Chinese population to restrict families to only one child in hopes of reducing the rapidly growing population.

While china One child Policy was aimed for improvement, the policy has caused some serious social consequences. The New England Journal of Medicine 's article "The Effect of China 's One-Child Family Policy after 25 Years" discuss the social consequences of Chinas One child policy. The One child policy in china begin when Chinese governments viewed population containment as a benefit for living and economic improvement. They created a one child policy that limits the size of families, the policy also includes regulations regarding marriage, spacing and childbearing. The strict policy is controlled with rewards and penalties, it applies to minorities of china which are Urban residents and government employees with the exception of one-child families, first children with disabilities and workers in high-risk work settings. The policy three social consequences concerning population growth, the ratio between men and women, and the ratio between adult children and dependent elderly parents. Each social consequences causes disastrous results. The policy is a sex imbalance that creates social consequences. The sex imbalance is what causes the different social consequence with undesirable effects. The first social consequence is decrease in population growth. Population growth in china has declined in the past 25 years. The policy has prevented many births as stated in the article " Chinese authorities claim that the policy has prevented 250 to 300 million births. The total

" All this evidence proves that the one-child policy left many Chinese youths feeling lonely and

The one-child policy was implemented in 1979 by the Chinese government (The Economist 3). Its original goal was to restrain the population growth from its expected goal of 1.4 billion to a maximum of 1.2 billion by the end of the century (Kane and Choi 992). The policy was created with little regard to the potential demographic or societal changes, but rather was a political and economic measure to control the abnormally high population growth (Feng et al. 84). China’s population was rapidly growing, but there was a severe shortage of natural

In the article "The Costs and Benefits of China's One-Child Policy" by Jane Golley (document E), they state that there are fewer workers in the population and that "the policy places a huge burden on single Chinese children" (Golley 1). This is because it is a small family of only 4 grandparents, 2 parents, and 1 child. Another emotional cost was if for any reason you had a second child they were not allowed to be enrolled in school or access the healthcare system. After this article it's clear that the one-child policy didn't make parents happy nor joyful, but more emotional. Which is why it wasn't a good

One of the more extreme measures taken in an attempt to control population has been China's one-child policy. Population advocate Garet Hardin suggests the rest of the world adopt similar policies. This paper is to show a country's government acting on theories that Hardin is popular for and the ethical and environmental effects that it had on people and the land. Hardin fails to see the ethical problems laid out by governments that suppress peoples thoughts and beliefs.

The final reason that the one-child policy was a bad idea is because of the fact that China’s fertility rate was already decreasing and was one of the lowest rates compared to Brazil, South Korea, and Thailand in 1979 making the policy pointless and unnecessary. “The claim by the Chinese officials that the one child policy has helped avert over 400 million births simply cannot be substantiated by

China’s one child policy can give unfair benefits to those who were more wealthy or noble. Those people were able to pay the steep fines for having a second child or were given pardons because they were favorable people. Money has been able to corrupt this system and has morally corrupted the equalness that it was originally supposed to bring. Tradable procreation permits have also caused corruption. Buying a second certificate from another couple is like bribing them to remain childless so you can have a second child (Sandel 72). It can also put the poor in a situation where they have to sell their certificate to the wealthy, so they can support themselves, even though they wanted to have a child. Being able to have a child is a right so buying and selling the certificates is like buying and selling a right that should be exclusive to the person who has it and not for

There has been a long history of China’s one child policy, since it was first introduces in 1979 by a Chinese Leader Deng Xiaoping (Rosenberg n.p). The law was meant to be temporary and used to control the population; however it is still in use today (Rosenberg n.p). When the policy was first enforced, it only

In October 12, 1999, the world's population has reached to 6 billion people. about only 12 years later (October 31, 2011) the world has gone up to 7 billion. Many people on the planet are worried about the world population going too high. They fear that too many people would result in starvation and quick depletion of resources. Some people believe that we should have some type of law that would limit the number of children we can have in each family. Something similar has come true in China about 30 years ago. In September 25, 1980, China's One-Child Policy has been created. This policy keeps parents from having more than one baby with the exception of twins, triplets, quadruplets, and so on. Parents may also have

Since 1980, China has made its people the subject of an intrusive and unfair, One Child Policy. This policy was the result of Chinese officials becoming worried of the countries jump in population from 1960 to 1980 causing a widespread lack of resources, so they decided to induct a law that would make force Chinese citizens to be limited to one child. Because of this controversial policy the question has been raised, did the one child policy positively or negatively effect China? The one child policy did negatively effect China and its people, because it resulted in gender discrimination, unjust punishments and was unnecessary due to the already declining fertility rate.

First of all, China population law should be abolished because the law limits the future of China, and the law decimates the economy. In the article China’s child policy, the authors state, “China can only have one child policy” This passage shows that China’s economy is beginning to struggle. Some of the citizens doesn't like the population law that the government does. It affects the citizens because they can’t do anything like Li Xia she couldn’t do anything because she doesn’t have her birth certificate.

It is also very well known all over the world that in China couples nowadays are not allowed to have more than one child. This policy was

China’s One Child Policy, is still one of the most controversial topics today, and the only one of its kind in history Since 1979, China has permitted its people to have only one child per family. The reason was to minimize population growth and increase resources for China’s nearly one billion people. At the time of the One Child Policy, the elder population were living longer and new babies were being born at a higher rate than before. At one point, families had up to five or six children. So, to expand resource usage to a larger number of people, the government sought to limit the legal population to no more than 700-800 million. In October 2015, China changed the policy to two kids per family. This amendment to the policy will take effect

China has already implemented some population restrictions upon its in inhabitants. The one child policy is put in place order to control the Chinese population of the country meaning less people to house in the future. It is proven effective by at least preventing 400 million births in 1980.3 This comes with a drawback of putting more pressure on the China’s economic future with the ratio of the elderly to the working force increasing. Ultimately cutting almost 400 million future workers, it puts a heavy strain on. With one child per household, it is effectively