The National Guard Under The Framers Of Constitution

“For the Common Defense, a military history of the United States from 1607-2012” is a military historic book written by Allan R. Millet, Peter Maslowski, and William B. Feis. Millet is a historian and a retired colonel of the Marine Corps. Maslowski is a professor at the University of Nebraska. Feis is a professor at Buena Vista University. This book was published in September 2012. It focuses on chronologically describing the changes of the United States military for over 400 years. Even though that is the main purpose, it does include political information. Although this book does not have an exact thesis, its purpose is to inform readers of the creation and enhancements of the US military. At almost 700 pages, this book educates about

The militia is all male bodies of the United States that are at least the age of 17. They are a group of armed citizens that enter the military service in time of need. They are called out from time to time but are used full time only for emergencies. They could refer to the National Guard.

The Army National Guard is a whole new way to serve. It 's all about commitment to help communities in need. It 's solid dedication to the country in war and in peace. They form an elite team that shares similar core values, convictions, and beliefs. To be in the National Guard can mean serving the country part-time, one weekend a month and two weeks a year as most Guard members serve. This is what makes them different from the other branches of the military. Experiences will be gained that would change one 's outlook on life forever. Skills will be learned that will last a lifetime. The Guard is a team that values serving others and being the best; a part-time job with full time

Senate Bill 656 does not allow for "well regulated" without context of "Militia," because it allows for all citizens to conceal arms instead of carrying them openly, which violates the above requirements for being considered a regular militia. However, militia has also changed in meaning. In the time of the American revolution militias was a localized fighting forces made of all able bodied men, more local even that state level as the Governors of the states were British appointees that the militias were rebelling against. Yet they were regular military forces, forming chains of command, carrying their weapons openly into battle, and following the laws of war while carrying their banners and flags. Our closest modern equivalent would be the National Guard. While they do fit the criteria for being regular militaries, the various National Guards of each state are not militias as the word was used writing the Bill of Rights. This is because they all fall under the ultimate command of the President, to use in any war America fights. More than just the 2nd Amendment, using state militias to fight in foreign wars is unconstitutional. The Constitution says, "The Congress shall have Power To ...provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;" (US Const. Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 15). Fighting wars on foreign soil is the realm of the Army. The

In order to understand the motivation of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution one must review the event leading up to it. When the war with Great Britain finally came to a close, the Colonialist of America became weary of what was to come. Many who were well versed in Tomas Hobbes and John Locke feared, without proper action and if not too long delayed, the that states would find themselves in a State of Nature.

The National Guard is subject to Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, which places them under state control and authorizes them to enforce laws upon the request of the governor (Spak et al., 2004).

The Framers of the United States Constitution chose to give power to the federal government opposed to the state governments for many reasons. Such as there were many problems with the Articles of Confederation. Also the Framers took away power from the state governments and gave power to the federal government for many reasons. Then what the constitution now says about federal and state powers.

In 1964, the year of Minuteman Missiles were installed and activated in North Dakota, The Herald printed sixty-five articles pertaining to nuclear weapons in some way. The average was five and a half articles per month. April contained the most articles printed, and July contained the least articles printed with nine and one articles, respectively. The statistics begin to paint a picture of successful civil defence. The fact that only 65 articles about nuclear weapons during the period of installation and activation demonstrates the public was not interestested or overly concerned with nuclear weapons at the time. The placement of the small number of articles within the paper further demonstrates the population of northeastern North Dakota was not concerned with nuclear weapons in

The framers of the Constitution predetermined that the Congress to be the foremost branch of the government. But not all the powers are enumerated in the Constitution, leaving some roof to the Supreme Court interpretation. Enumerated Powers, are the powers that are listed in the Constitution, which the Congress can hold to. Implied power is the last clause of the Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution. It states that Congress my pass any law that is “necessary and proper” in order to be able to “carry out its foregoing powers”. Banks are one of the examples in which the Congress used implied powers. In the case, McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) was held that the Second Bank of the United States is a “necessary and proper” action in order to regulate the fiscal policies and diminish the speculations maintained by other banks. Another example of implied power is the draft in the military and implied power to raise an army. The government reserves this right in order to be able to protect itself. Of course, it still has set up limits so the government does not abuse the system. The 3d Amendment protects people’s property from quartering soldiers. It states that the Third Amendment forbids the forcible housing of military personnel in a citizen’s home during peacetime and requires the process to be “prescribed by law” in times of war. (Legal Information Institute) A third example of the use of implied power is the Minimum Wage, this being also a “necessary and proper” action in

The amount of men that were ready to serve in a military limit was a pressing fear all through the royal period. royal orders to New Jersey requested a count of the men "that fit to manage arms in the civilian army of our said province. Reports from the Georgia borders told the general population's determination to protect themselves, if assaulted by building fortifications for the security of the women, kids, and those who couldn’t fit to carry a gun. Whoever refused to carry arms and also comply with the militia law came with a price. The Georgia Congress imposed a fine against any individual obligated to show up and carry weapons at marshals, who ignored to arrive completely armed and provided. It is evident here that individual guns were liable to control.

Now lets ask ourselves, what does the second amendment mean? Who gets to keep and bear arms? One side focuses on the phrase “A well-regulated militia” to argue that only people who are in a militia such as the National Guard have the right to bear arms. The other side focuses on the phrase “The right of the people” to argue that law-abiding citizens, whether or not they are in a militia have the right to bear arms. Who’s correct? For further insight, the wisdom and prudence of our founding fathers proves to be instructive, as they lived in this influential time. In the Federal Farmer number 28, Richard Henry Lee wrote, “A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves.” In congruence with Richard’s thinking Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to James Madison saying, “What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve

A well regulated Militia, composed of the body of the people trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state

The Patriot policy developed, after the horrible events of 9/11 attacks. It was in power to ensure that Americans would never have to deal with a tragedy as such again happening, to our beloved society and citizens. That we will protect and secure from the United States enemies and will be better equip, to prevent threats and attacks that are foreign and domestic. A paper we will discuss our point, of view of the Patriot Act and the related legislation that deal with the following areas. Like the Societal implications of the USA PATRIOT law and similar legislation limiting daily behaviors. Next are the worries associated to race, ethnicity, sexual

The framers of the Constitution regarded the right to free speech as a great standard they decided to make free speech the First Amendment. If society is limited to talk openly, one can 't safeguard freedom of speech. Can you imagine a scenario in which the rights and everything that is freedom is gone? The right to speak freely gives us the capacity to convey thoughts without government control. The right to speak freely enables a person’s capacity to think and to express thoughts in different methods for making yourself heard, including written, verbal speeches, books, and or taped material. That is why music has changed, it is not restricted like it used to be in the past. The right to speak freely secures all speech, however offensive or disliked the speech may be, the speech is ensured. It is the insurance of freedom. By leaving the zone of correspondence absolutely free, it gives one a chance to save our individual rights and opportunities. No private activity qualifies as restriction: the refusal to pay a consideration on others or to give them a stage to talk is an act of free speech and does not mean the privilege of free speech has been taken away. Only on the grounds that you have something to say, it doesn 't mean anybody needs to hear you out. A considerable lot of the films, books, TV shows and music Americans appreciate regular are just accessible in America in light of our First Amendment rights. One 's right to speak freely through self- expression as a

The second amendment of the Constitution states -“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Constitution, Amendment 2). There is much debate as to whether the Amendment refers to individuals having the right to bear arms or that we are entitled to have an army (militia) that is ready at moments notice to fight for our country. Both interpretations are technically correct as they are present in the Amendment. Every state had a National Guard that is readily available in case of disaster or war. This goes without mentioning our military that are also ready and waiting. Everyone shares in the protection