The Matrix Comparison

They reason why this movie is well liked. The acting in a movie is a huge part, if the actors do a good job in the movie.

Chapter 2 of Anthem and The Matrix are very similar but has a lot of differences as well. For example, in chapter 2 of Anthem Equality 7-2521 did not follow the rules because they/he was not suppose to acknowledge women and vice versa. That was actually considered a sin. In Matrix, Neo (not sure if that's the correct name) followed instructions throughout all the scenes that we got to see. Even though it was a part where he decided that he wasn't going to follow someone's rules, he is still being instructed to do certain things and make some difficult decisions. For example, he having to decide whether he would take the blue pill or red pill. Also in Matrix they make their own decisions, think on their own and be themselves but in Anthem they

Just like every other movies, there is always one side who found the film enjoyable and other side which hates every single lines from the movie. Therefore, it is not right to say that this movie is “forgettable” because for some people this movie might be their favorite movie of the year and some of the features in the movie might be very relatable for

the first of its kind to be made with a small budget, unknown cast, and limited resources. This proves that this film is unique by showing how differently the director and actors

We all have our choices, likes and dislikes, and views and are entitled to our own. You might like something that would seem completely and utterly obnoxious to someone else and vice-versa. In the same way the Box Office works. It’s a rather rare deal when a good movie is underrated or hasn’t been given its due credit because the audience did not understand; mostly it’s because of reasons such as the budget of the movie, the cast or even the production design. Even when the story line is spot on and it can support it without fancy actors or glamourous sets.

In “Why Movies Still Matter,” by Richard Brody, Brody clarifies about Raftery’s published article, “Could This Be the Year Movies Stopped Mattering,” and believes the approach of his article was directed the wrong way, yet providing valid points. By going into depth, he defends his opinion on why individuals should still be aware about the movie’s importance and existence.

There is a reason for this however; not the least of which is the films enduring timelessness made all the more impressive by its subject matter. Made during the decline of the studio system, the film was an oddity onto itself. A tiny black and white film at a time of Technicolor, a principle cast of character actors at a time of A-list credit cramming, and

Film is my passion. I thoroughly enjoy watching and analyzing movies - finding the pros and cons. In film there are many different pieces that have to go together in order to make a movie work including: cinematography, the actual image and how it is displayed; sound, the score, sound effects and overall how clear it is to understand what actors are saying; the editing, how all the individual clips are put together; and dialogue and story, what the actors are saying and what the movie is about. A bad movie probably has done most of these poorly. A good movie may be lacking in one of these departments. A great movie has all bases covered, however, there are exceptions on this depending on personal preference. Some movies might end up being controversial. Some may love it. Same may hate it. But one must still appreciate a movie for all the hard work and effort that has been poured into it. My favourite example of a polarizing movie is Jared Hess’ 2004 movie Napoleon Dynamite.

Everyone watches movies, whether it be in a theater or just at home on your TV. The reason that most people think of is just simply for entertainment. The fact that there are so many different genres of movies makes it easy for us to bring out different emotions while watching them. Those rush of emotions are what keeps us entertained and coming back for more.

In conclusion, the three empirical articles compared provided much research, data, and informative topics that furthers discussion of the research that is available. Each article obtained limitations. Article one limitations was based on the average age of the respondents being 50 years and mostly Caucasian. Many of the jurisdictions had only three respondents and may not be good representation of the opinions of the direct reports given. Transformational leadership might not be the result of less hierarchal organizations. (Grand Canyon University Doctoral Studies Comparison Matrix Chart). Limitations in the contrast of the important test of transformational and transactional leadership on organizational performance were performed in organizations tat had either exclusively male and female managers while limiting the study based on only banking and food organizations. The third article limits its research by the availability of instruments

Exactly a decade ago, Hollywood produced not one, but two wonder-children (or rather, young adults). The unique backstory of an Oscar-winning film written by two frat boys fresh out of college enticed households across the country. The niched marketing of the film seemed to, in fact, destine it for greatness.

One day he happened upon the private journals of a woman with a kindred spirit.

Do you like watching a romance unfold? How about a man performing feats that are superhuman? Maybe a group of teenagers being stalked by a raging lunatic? If any of these things sound appealing then you may be a fan of movies. Film has been an important part of American culture since it's inception. From the clothes that you wear and the music that you listen too; movies had a hand in it. It has also given people a respite from the monotony of daily life. Movies have been such an influence on our lives it is important to know how motion pictures took a hold of our imaginations and have changed over the years.

There are three major standards through which I decide whether or not I will watch a film: reputation, and genre. Reputation is inclusive of friends and ratings of the film. Usually my friends and I have similar tastes and we are aroused or repulsed by the same films. Reputation is a strong and stable standard for deciding which film to go to, because with such a large population of movie watchers, major biases don't affect the reputation and ratings are fair and accurate. Also, people are inclined to give high ratings to movies that touch them or really make them think regardless

If there is at least one film that I almost ended up liking, but the “almost” part hit the curve real fast by the end of the film, then that film was Enemy. There are some elements in a film that make a film work well and look great and they include many things, like concepts of photography, music and art direction to acting and many other factors, but ultimately it all breaks down to the story. You could enjoy a film and still consider it bad because it failed to give you a good story. In Enemy, I feel like there was a cool story behind it, but what became of it onscreen ended up being a mess.