With the development of the globalization, the business connection between diverse countries is becoming stronger and closer. Thus finding a uniform business language among different enterprises is an increasingly important issue, which could help company owner to understand better and evaluate various investment opportunities in foreigner countries. Accounting is widely recognized as one of the most efficient and useful tools to communicate in the business word. However, there are a large number of accounting standards in diverse financial markets, such as Japan Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (JGAAP), Australian Accounting Standard (ASS) and the US Generally Accepted Accounting Principle (US GAAP). To fill the gap between discrepant accounting standard, the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) attempt to set up universal accounting standard and make it universally accepted and applied. IASB has established in 2001 April, which was reorganized by the International Accounting Standard Committee (IASC), and its work is quickly approved by its target group. During this process, a common conceptual framework was initially developed by a joint IASB-FASB Project, which was used as a basis for accounting standards. In 2012, this project was suspended and replaced by an IASB-only comprehensive project (reference). Initially, the conceptual framework was revised by the IASB and the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB), which is the US national accounting
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) was formed in an attempt to bring uniform accounting standards within international countries through its issuing of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). Today, over 100 countries including Canada, India, and Japan have adopted these standards for financial reporting. The growth of multinational companies such as Coca Cola and the increasing desire of cross-border investing have made it apparent that the U.S.accounting standards known as the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) can no longer remain separate from IFRS. Under the request of the Securities and
In 1973, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was created and their mission is “to establish and improve standards of financial accounting and reporting for the guidance and education of the public, including issuers, auditors, and users of financial information.” (FASB.org, 2009a). The FASB is a private, not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is to develop generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) within the United States. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) designated the FASB as the organization responsible for setting accounting standards for public companies in the U.S. Therefore, the FASB plays a vital and important role in protecting the financial well being and the overall stability of our
A formal document issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), which details accounting standards and
A joint convergence committee created the members of (FASB) and (IASB). (IASB) is recognized as an independent accounting standard-setting body that is similar to (FASB) that joins (GAAP), and is governed by the (IFRS) foundation. Due to this convergence, (AICPA) believes U.S. adoption of a single set of high-quality, globally accepted accounting standards will benefit U.S. financial markets and public companies by enabling preparation of transparent and comparable financial reports throughout the world, (American Institute of CPAs, 2016). Secondly, (AICPA) is dedicated to supplying the whole accounting profession with information, tools and IFRS.com for instance to assimilate as well as implement a new set of standards. As the (AICPA) supports continual convergence of reliable accounting standards between (IFRS) and (GAAP) the mission of completion between (IASB) and (FASB) is prolonged. (AICPA) will always support funding mechanisms of the body-making
Accounting has been playing a very important role in many places such as Australian accounting standards. Australian accounting standards is also developed by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB). This essay will firstly discuss what AASB is, the role and the functions of AASB. And then, following this, the other projects’ role such as Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and the relationship between AASB, FRC and IASB.
Almost 10 years ago on July 13, 2006, FASB, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FIN 48 the Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 is also known as Interpretation No. 48 that became effective during December 2006 fiscal year. It explains the uncertain tax positions regarding the calculations and disclosures of reserves in the Statement No. 109 of the FASB. The purpose of the FASB Interpretation No. 109, also referred to as, FIN 48, clarifies uncertainty in income taxes recognized by FASB Statement No. 109. The Statement does not recognize a threshold or measures the contribution for the financial statements. Accounting for income taxes (No. 109) is used for business enterprises. Also, it is applicable to
increased international compatibility of accounting standards should occur, because they are developed in the context of a conceptual framework that is similar to the conceptual frameworks used by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and major overseas national standard setters;
The national Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) came together and jointly issued a newer revenue recognition standards. This will change the effects of the current revenue guided under US GAAP and IFRS. It will take not much of the time to be used as the date is set to have effects from 2017. All of the firms had to work under the rules and regulations set. There is enough of the time left to understand and work on the changes. On dated 28th May, 2014 the new revenue standards were issued for contracts with customers. It has the power to give limitations and new rules are to be followed by various industries. It also includes those industries which have their own policies
On February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (Update) on Leases (Topic 842) to communicate changes to the FASB Codification. In this Update it defines the term, Leases and also explains why FASB is issuing this Update, who will be affected by the amendments, how do the main provision differ from current Generally Accepted Accounting Principal (GAAP) and why are they an improvement, as well as explaining the transition and when the amendment will be effective.
Lease is one of the most important measures in providing an overall financial obligations of a company. It’s a way of gaining access to assets, obtaining finance and reducing risk of assets ownership (IFRS Exposure Draft Leases 2013, pp. 5). However, existing lease recognition under standard AASB 117 is limited and inconsistent, it does not provide a clear picture to the existing financial statement users.
Inventory is an asset, and it has value and significance to a company since it can be sold for cash. This usually occurs in a repetitive pattern during the cycle of the business, where inventory is bought, sold, created, and acquired. The central focus of a company should be matching inventory with cost and subsequent revenue (FASB 330-10-1, 2009). Defined clearly, “the primary basis of accounting for inventories is cost,…defined generally as the price paid…to acquire as asset” (FASB, 330-30-1, 2009). The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) chose first-in, first-out (FIFO), last-in, first-out (LIFO), and average cost to be the only methods used to account for inventory dependent on which “reflects period income” the best (FASB 330-30-9, 2009). However, many question the use of historical cost to value inventory to be the best method and, under ideal conditions, these methods to value inventories may need adjustment as well.
So, the benefit behind the conceptual framework is increasing users’ understanding of financial reporting. Second, IASB cannot be alone without the implementation of IFRS. Also, IASB made it easy for companies to compare financial statements due to the procedural of IASB. However, it will enable auditors to quickly resolve financial reporting problems by referring to an existing framework. Third, the reason where IASB framework, developing future accounting standards. Through, globalization accounting becomes an international language, it allowed a lot of investment opportunities and trading internationally. Fourth, understandable information about financial statements for users.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is the body in the U.S. that sets the accounting standards. These standards issued are referred to as the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. FASB has an Accounting Standards Codification (ASC), which is a source of seeing nongovernmental US GAAP. FASB provides a Codification research system website, which can be utilized by accountants, lawyers, and students as a means to view content, perform research, and submit feedback. The goal of the Codification was to give accurate up-to-date standard-setting activity in one spot while being user-friendly by codifying all US GAAP. According to the FASB official website, “…the Codification is expected to: 1. Reduce the amount of time and effort required to solve an accounting research issue 2. Mitigate the risk of noncompliance through improved usability of the literature 3. Provide accurate information with real-time updates as Accounting Standards Updates are released 4. Assist the FASB with the research and convergence efforts (About the Codification v4.10 https://asc.fasb.org/help&cid=1176163588636).”
I appreciate the chance to respond to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s invitation to comment on the Proposed Accounting Standards Update-Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Changes in Measurement of PPE on the Balance Sheet and Income Statement.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board has issued for public comment two Exposure Drafts related to its disclosure framework project. The first exposure draft proposes amendments to Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts - Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting, Chapter 3 – Qualitative Characteristics of Useful Financial Information. The purpose of this proposed amendment is to clarify the concept of “materiality”. FASB defines materiality as, information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions that users make on the basis of the financial information of a specific reporting entity. In other words, materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature or magnitude or both of the items to which the information relates in the context of an individual entity’s financial report. Consequently, the Board cannot specify a uniform quantitative threshold for materiality or predetermine what could be material in a particular situation.