preview

The Ineffective Leader In George Orwell's Animal Farm

Good Essays

“Beasts of England, beasts of Ireland, Beasts of every land and clime, Hearken to my joyful tidings of the golden future time…rings shall vanish from our noses and the harness from our back, bit and spur shall rust forever, cruel whips no more shall crack (Orwell, 5).” The analogy of the Russian Revolution, Animal Farm by George Orwell tells the story of how a group of animals kick Farmer Jones off of his farm and take over. At first, it seems to be going well, until Napoleon the pig starts taking the lead. Overall, He makes a horrible leader. For a person to qualify as a good leader, they have to be kind, understanding, gentle, truthful, and willing to work hard, or else, no one will want to be around them. Napoleon is the complete opposite …show more content…

Every time Napoleon lies, the animals and the reader loose trust in him. For instance, when Napoleon told the animals that he would send Boxer the horse to an animal hospital, he did not really mean it. The animals soon realized that Napoleon was sending boxer to “the knackers. (Orwell, 55)” Napoleon, as always, sent squealer to explain everything to the animals. Once again, he made up some lies to calm the animals. It was obvious that squealer was lying. “He fell silent for a moment, and his little eyes darted suspicious glances from side to side before he proceeded. (56)” Every time Napoleon wanted to take care of the animal’s anxiety, he would feed them lies. This is an awful way to fix the problem because any leader should tell the truth to his people so that they do not rebel later. Furthermore, when the animal’s first start running the farm, the pigs come up with seven commandments. Throughout the story, they change along with how Napoleon is starting to live life. By the end, all of them are gone and the only one still scratched into the wall reads, “ ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL\ BUT SOME ARE MORE EQUAL\THAN OTHERS. (61)” After all that has happened, the reader cannot trust napoleon to stand for what is right, since is he is always changing the rules, and neither can the animals. Napoleon does not “practice what he preaches,” but instead changes the rules so that he can live the way he wants to. By doing …show more content…

No matter what he does, it always only benefits his own life and well-being. First of all, he takes a litter of puppies from their mother and uses them as his personal bodyguards and executioners (Orwell, 38). Napoleon, the character representing Joseph Stalin has no effect on Animal farm or it’s animals. “He never shows interest in the strength of Animal Farm itself, only in the strength of his power over it. (Spark)“ this quote explains exactly the way napoleon led and why it was ineffective. Furthermore, Napoleon takes away the lives of countless animals, just so that he can be successful. He kills everyone who claims to be planning with snowball against him; in that, all that he really succeeds in is filling the animals with fear. There is really no obvious advantage to this. Napoleon only does what he wants to by taking away numerous things from animals including their lives. To be an effective leader, one must know how to win others to their side, not force by taking away from them. In conclusion, Napoleon is an ineffective leader because he takes thing from the animals to win them to his

Get Access