The Importance Of The Executive Branch In The United States

Another of these monumental changes would be the surrender of the control of power from the legislative branch to the executive branch. Over the twentieth century, this became an increasing reality as the focus shifted from Congress to the president (Cooper 2009, 388). While this development has many different advantages in the American government system, there are disadvantages as well, such as a decrease in stability (Cooper 2009, 379). The role of the president has become more important because of the changes that have led to the modern world (Cooper 2009, 388). This has occurred because of a number of reasons, such as “substantial increases in the responsibilities of the federal government, the stakes of politics, and the ease of communication and travel” (Cooper 2009, 388). Furthermore, in recent years, Congress has not worked hard in certain circumstances to protect their rights but have surrendered to the executive branch (Davidson, Oleszek, and Lee 2010, 498). It is

In this essay, I will be writing about how the power relationship between the United States Congress and the presidency has changed during the past two hundred years. I will be talking about how the executive branch is more powerful than the legislative branch and how the changing relationship between Congress and the president affected American democracy in a good way.

The Constitution provided many ways to prevent tyranny such as popular sovereignty, federalism, etc., but this paper focuses on the two most important; checks and balances and separation of powers. Separation of Powers was a brilliant idea, because it gave each branch of the government certain powers that the other branches didn’t have (Document D), and the other branches couldn’t take that power away from each other.

The Founding Fathers Executive Ideal The complete understanding of the executive office can be judged within two classes: how effectively elected officials perform in office for their time, and how that performance stacks up against what the founding fathers initially intended when they drafted the second article of the constitution. Looking to the presidential powers from George Washington to William McKinley, one can evaluate how the anticipated plans for government played out over a century of new American rule. With the ever present indecision among political members that originated between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson about just how powerful government should be and how it’s powers should be used, there exists an ever present pull between expansive executive power and a society where rule lies largely with the people. With this in

Separation of Powers/Checks and Balances. For much of 2011 and 2012, public dissatisfaction with Congress rose to all time highs, with 70-80% expressing disapproval with how Congress does its job. Many commentators note that Americans are fed up with Washington “grid-lock” that makes government apparently unable to address important problems. Other observers believe that the national government is acting according to its design, based on separation of powers and

The concept of power is a divisive matter in the American political system, as the actors holding it are sometimes unable to impose it as a result of their limited authority to do so. The legislative, executive, and judicial branches in the national government depend on each-others point of view. Part of the Constitution was designed with the purpose of making it impossible for either of these three to become more powerful than the others. Each of them has the ability to check and balance the way that the other two function. In spite of the fact that this system was created with the intention of preventing power from being shared unequally in the country, it sometimes serves as a tool for political gridlock, considering that the judicial branches can debate in regard to a particular topic for unlimited amounts of time before actually reaching a conclusion regarding the respective issue.

Like nature, the United States government has evolved to meet the demands of an ever growing population, the increasing terrorist threat, and a new state of mind in terms of what government should look like. Each branch of the federal system plays a key role in controlling the populace. The Executive branch handles day-to-day maintenance of the federal government, makes sure laws are enforced and carried out, as well as represents the U.S. to foreign interests. The Legislative branch passes laws and allocates funds for use in running the federal government and providing assistance to the states. The Judicial branch hears cases that involve disputes between interpretations of the laws or those that challenge them. A delicate balance

Over 200 years ago the United States’ Founding Fathers created a unique system of government that allowed a balance to exist between both the federal government and the separate state governments. Through the three branches of government, specifically the executive and legislative branches, the United States has been able to act as a unified body with several varying individual parts. With the executive branch and the legislative branch each having outlined powers of their own the Founders were able to equally balance the power of the national government and the state governments. Although this system has managed to stay in tact for two centuries and has allowed the United States of America to become a dominate player in international affairs, there has consistently been a battle of power between the president in the executive branch and the two houses of congress in the legislative branch. As the United States continues to evolve and face multiple obstacles, so does the relationship between these two branches.

According to the Constitution, the United State has divided the foreign policy powers between the President and the Congress. I agree that the power should be divided into 2 groups so that they can help each other and also prevent from abusing the power. There are three branches of government: the legislative, the executive and the judicial. Each of branches can have ability to check on each other. The President can veto legislation and Congress can override the President’s veto. However, the court declare a law of Congress or and act of the President unconstitutional.

Over the years since The Constitution was written The President’s powers have grew to the point where the other branches have lost their effectivity. As the world around us changes so should the Constitution as it has become outdated and indirectly allowed the president to have more power than was it expected. The President’s job is to defend the citizens of the United States against being overpowered by the Judicial Branch and Legislative branches but what are we supposed to do when the President themself has gain enough power to where the legislative branch and Judicial either half to bend to them or will agree with them to gain more power. The President's power has grown as military advances, as the have found new ways to work the Legislative

The United States government braces its power among three powerful branches, legislative, executive and judicial. These branches interact with one another to establish authority that is strong, yet equal to have power over the country. Each branch pursues certain responsibilities and duties to operate in an efficient and effective manner in which society upholds. The executive, legislative and judicial branches all interact amid each other to validate accuracy of the nation’s most powerful law of the land, the Constitution. It is important to know how these branches interact with each other to learn how a bill becomes a law. Reflecting on how the three branches promote a balance of power that is constructive to include the agendas and

Madison said “If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” (Madison, 1788). A system of checks and balances needed to be implemented. Madison argued that the only way the government could be effective was to allow it to “control the governed, and in the next place [be obliged] to control itself” (Madison, 1788). The Executive Branch is responsible for implementing the laws passed by the Legislative Branch, and those same laws are either upheld or rejected by the Judicial Branch. The three branches of government must work together to provide for the general welfare. The fragmentation of the power, along with a system of checks and balances, greatly diminishes the ability for one branch to gain too much power. This guarantees the rights of the people and ensures the government’s ability to govern.

Some worry that an executive free from strong oversight of the legislature, will usurp for the executive branch extra-Constitutional powers. This concern is addressed in the system of checks and balances in the proposed Constitution. The Congress will write and approve any legislation, which will then be sent to the President to be signed into law. This design will create a strong tie between the President and the Congress, and an additional layer of security is added through the President’s ability to veto legislation that does not appeal to his vision

In late January 2017, President Trump signed an executive order banning immigration from seven predominantly islamic countries. Trump stated that the order is necessary in order to keep radical terrorists out of the United States, but the main issue regarding this executive order is that many believe that the main cause for it is based on bigotry and not national security.

The executive branch in the government has the responsibility of enforcing the laws in the United States of America. There have been some cases where executive power has been used. In this essay I will talk about the following: Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer, Korematsu v. United States, and Ex Parte Merryman.