Imagine if a child was sent to school and one of his or her or classmates, or possibly even themselves, brought something illegal that could hurt people? Students could do this everyday and teachers would not know because the student did not seem suspicious. Students should not have privacy in schools so that these things do not occur. Schools should have this unlimited right to search a student’s possessions because of ownership issues, educational purposes, and safety precautions. Schools should have an unlimited right to search a student’s possessions because of ownership issues. Some people believe that because the student’s use the lockers in school, that it is theirs and that they deserve privacy. This is not true because the students did not pay for the lockers, and because the lockers are not located on the student’s property. Students do not own the lockers they use. Which should make them expect little privacy. The Wisconsin court had a case against Isiah B, who said the school searching his locker was illegal. “The Wisconsin court disagreed. It ruled that since the lockers were the property of the Madison schools…. Isiah B. had no ‘reasonable expectation of privacy,’” (Peart). The school's own these lockers and are simply allowing students to use them. Schools should have the ability to search a student’s locker whenever they want. Students should not expect a reasonable amount of privacy, unless they own the locker. As a result, schools owning the lockers should give them the ability to search the lockers. Schools should also have an unlimited right to search a student’s possessions because of educational purposes. A student’s main focus in school should be about learning, not about what classmates are keeping in their locker. “The Supreme Court ruled that student’s privacy rights and their protection against ‘unreasonable search and seizure’ must be weighed against the school’s need to provide a sound learning environment,” (DiConsiglio). By allowing a teacher to search a locker should not be a problem if none of the students have something to hide. If a student does have something to hide, and does not want a teacher to search their locker, the school needs to make sure whatever they have would
should be punished for breaking the law and school rules. The school needs to maintain its authority over students; search and seizure is part of maintaining order.
In the case New Jersey v. T.L.O., the student’s purse was searched after the principal had reasonable suspicion that she had cigarettes in her purse since she was caught smoking in the bathroom. The court decision in this case concluded that teachers are acting as agents for the state and are therefore allowed to search if they have reasonable suspicion. Students do have the Fourth Amendment right as all people in America have. However, student’s expectation of privacy has to be balanced with the needs of the school to maintain the educational environment. Schools do not have to obtain a warrant to search, but must have reasonable suspicion in order to search a student’s person or property.
Personally I think it is a violation of the law in some cases. Schools do have the permission to search the lockers though because of the fact that it is their property they’ve funded it but there has been some situations with faculty searching your pockets and backpacks or even making you take off your clothing. Now the pocket and backpack check is something that they can do when you enter the building but not at random times. They have to have probable cause which means they need a reason to search you meaning the person who is conducting the search or a witness visibly see you with something you’re not supposed to have, or smell a use of drugs or alcohol.
On account of lockers being the school’s property it is legal for them to search them at any time under the right circumstances.
One particular Supreme Court case that dealt with a student's fourth amendment rights is New Jersey v. T.L.O., 1985. A 14-year-old girl, identified as T.L.O, was spotted smoking. The assistant vice principal searched through her purse and found cigarettes, rolling paper, marijuana, an usually large of amount of money and a list of students who had not payed her yet. The Supreme Court sided with the school district, and ruled that the search was not unconstitutional. It's important to keep in mind, that schools are not required to have reasonable suspicion or a warrant to search a locker, since a locker is school
The reason is schools should be able to search students belongings to make sure they do not contain contraband items such as marijuana, guns, knives ,...etc. But schools should never have the right to search your person even if you are carrying contraband because schools should not have enough jurisdiction. School officials should have to call law enforcement to the school to conduct a proper search on a student that is believed to be carrying contraband. Schools just want a safe environment for teaching and learning so that student can know that they are safe in school and not have to worry about getting in harm's
Such actions that may violate a student’s constitutional rights as a citizen would be an administrator or school law enforcement searching a student or their personal belongings for unjustified reasons while in school. The boundaries of the fourth amendment are very complicated when dealing with the rights of students being that the school systems have
Ever since the first school shooting, a lot of people have changed their beliefs on this subject. I was in eighth grade when the shooting at Columbine High School took place. Before that shooting, I never would have considered something like that happening. Now, it is seventeen years later and school shootings almost seem like an everyday thing. That is sad, but it is true. This is why I believe a student should not have a high expectation of privacy while at school. The law used to be more lenient, but these circumstances have changed that. Right after Columbine, a lot of states had a zero tolerance law. According to the Center for Public Education site, this law said that if a student was caught with contraband they were given a strict punishment, no matter what the circumstance was. The laws have changed some over the last few years, and are not quite as strict as that. The schools still have to ensure that every student is safe, though. It is common for schools to have metal detectors or bring in dogs on a regular basis. Once they have a reason to suspect a student, they have the right to search their belongings. I believe this is well within their rights as administrators who are trying to protect the school as a whole. I realize that students may feel violated, I have been there. It was always an inconvenience to have to sit outside the hallways while the dogs searched each room. I never felt like it was wrong when they did find something though. So many students would bring large amounts of drugs, guns and knives to school. If it weren’t for the measures that the school took they would just be walking around with these items. I hope these laws never change, and my kids have the same protection that I did. I would hate to imagine my child going to school with guns and drugs within an arm’s reach. I believe the issue of student’s privacy is one that many people can agree with each other on.
Prior to the landmark ruling by the United States Supreme Court, New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 105 S. Ct. 733, 83 L. Ed. 2d 720 (1985), the clarity on how search and seizures applied to students in public schools were unclear. A particular case from 1969 can shed some light regarding on how the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution defines student rights in public schools. In Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 U.S. 503, 89 S. Ct. 733; 21 L. Ed. 2d 731 (1969), the court found that:
In conclusion, even though there are many different pros and cons about searching school lockers humans today need to search them if need when needed.Although school locker searches can be bad in some legal
Some claim that they are the school property and if something is going on then they should be able to conduct a search, but the schools did give the students the lockers to keep there stuff safe, on the impretion that the schools can’t shereach them.So schools shouldn’t be allowed to conduct random searches of students privat items.
The intent of the Fourth Amendment is to guarantee security against unreasonable governmental searches. Because school officials are actually
Where as others may believe that this will make the school system more of a bureaucracy. Further more those would also argue that most of the time lockers are hardly involved in the keeping of contrabands. If students have contraband items they are more likely to keep it on them and therefore randomly searching lockers it not as important. The time and energy which would be spent searching lockers could be used in more efficient way.
When we typically think of a leader, we think of some who has it all together and, has been accepted by their peers. This thought process is so far from the truth. This Journal exposes some of the issues women in the church face. It also gave me things to apply as a leader at my church.
Egyptian civilization began over 5,000 years ago and is one of the oldest and most advanced civilizations of all time. The Egyptians created religion and rules which founded the way of life for the people of that time. They adapted their own views of what life after death was like and they had a strong belief in immortality, believing that their life on earth was only one aspect of their eternal journey. Due to their strong belief in the afterlife, the ancient Egyptians established funerary practices for each person who died, these practices varied depending on their social class and wealth. From everyday people being buried in a simple religious way, to the pharaohs and wealthy being buried elaborately. The way in which each individual was buried all depended on their social class and wealth and was a huge part of their everyday life for people living in ancient Egypt.