“Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognizes before it can speak” (Berger, p. 7). In these famous lines, John Berger captures the efficacy that a simple photo can have in comparison to the written word. From childhood to adulthood, individuals can capture much greater meaning through examination of photography rather than reading text. Due to this, organizations commonly attempt to convey ideas through the use of pictures. Whether it may be an aspect of history, or a modern day controversial subject, the effectiveness in undeniable. To display that the common idiom “a picture is worth a thousand words” is valid, two portrayals of child vaccinations will be analyzed. Both photos depict the controversy of child vaccinations, but have underlying connotations that vary. These connotations can be attributed to the use of mystification, which as Berger states “is the process of explaining away what might otherwise be evident” (Berger, pp. 15-16). Rather than both photos simply showing a child receiving a vaccination, they mystify the situation to better depict their views on the topic. The first photo is comprised of a baby reaching toward a gloved hand holding a syringe. It is safe to assume the gloved hand belongs to a doctor, and the baby is about to receive a vaccination. Rather than looking ominously at the syringe, the child almost looks as if he longs for it. It is common knowledge that there are few children that would look at the threatening figure of a
“Don’t let any more babies die because of anti-vaccination lobby” is written by Susie O’Brien on 24 March 2015 at 12:00 am on the Herald Sun. Written as an opinion piece, O’Brien approaches her audience in a serious yet informal way. Regarding the issue of how parents are not vaccinating their children, O’Brien contends that action should be taken in order to ensure parents vaccinating their kids. O’Brien voices that anti-vaccinators are putting other kids’ lives at risk as well as their own. Furthermore, the author has provided the reader with a picture of a baby displaying how sweet and calm it looks. Lastly, O’Brien states that due to the low vaccination rates, Australia is sure to have another whooping cough epidemic.
To persuade the audience of this argument she uses visuals, evidence and an appeal to worry or shock tactics. The visual, by Wayne Taylor, is of a young child getting a vaccination, this instils the idea that vaccines decrease the risk of diseases rather than increase the risk as many people believe. “increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth… birth defects,” these phrases intend to instil a sense of worry or fear in the audience as they care about their families and other helpless children and babies who can’t fight against diseases without vaccinations.
This article largely appeals to pathos to make us feel compelled to vaccinate our children. Parker compares her perfectly healthy childhood with no vaccines to her children’s very healthy childhood with vaccines. which her children have rarely been sick. She uses her illnesses such as developing penicillin-resistant quinsy, the same disease that killed Queen Elizabeth, to appeal to the audience’s emotions. She then uses the children of anti-vaxxers to appear helpless for not having the choice to be
The video “Vaccine War” regards people opinion on vaccinations. The big question for new parents is whether they should or shouldn’t vaccinate their child. This includes various opinions from different people and what they think should be done, including mothers and pediatricians. This decision can be lifesaving, or prevent a child from getting something they shouldn’t have received.
To vaccinate or not to vaccinate? Parents with infants and young children have been tussling with this proverbial question for several decades now. With the advent of the internet and the World Wide Web, parents have been bombarded with a plethora of information about pros and cons of vaccines from all kinds of sources, some creditable, and some are not. To the non-scientific community, these conflicting information can create problems in the decision making process; thus, forcing parents to make the wrong choices and putting their offspring and others at risk. However, this article will attempt to address the importance of vaccinations, how vaccines work, why we should vaccinate, and why parents should not be afraid to vaccinate their offspring.
In healthcare, we are seeing an influx of children with diseases that were once eradicated by vaccinations. It does not help that in recent years many public figures, be it actors or politicians, have begun speaking out about the effects vaccinations potentially have on children. Whether they have done the proper research or not, their fame and notoriety brings about attention that most would not. So, what does the increase in non-vaccinated children mean to the rest of those that accepted the vaccinations. A closer look at immunizations for adults and children, the herd immunity that is in jeopardy, and the culture and reasoning of the anti-vaccination group may shed some light on the culture of anti-vaccination.
As parents are refusing to vaccinate their children against these “long-gone” diseases due to the concern for the vaccine’s safety, they are opening the doors for those diseases like polio and measles to devastate the whole American community once again. These parents react this way because they have different realities. For example, every american back when Franklin D Roosevelt was alive knew what polio was and what it was capable of due to the effect that it had on a nation's president. Nowadays, parents are drawn to campaigns on the safety of vaccinations because of celebrities or other personalities that are protesting against vaccinations due to personal negative experience with expressed vaccine. Since many parents nowadays have not had any personal experiences with most vaccine-preventable diseases they are quick to act when, for example, Jenny McCarthy speaks up about the possibility that autism can be caused by today's vaccinations because many americans have had personal experiences with this disease or are more familiar with this disease since it is widely covered in recent media.
As more and more vaccinations are being set in place for our children to receive, the society including parents, caregivers, teachers and even researchers begin to develop fears about whether or not they are truly safe for children. Researchers have argued that vaccinations could potentially be unnecessary for our children. Due to studies that show that the targeted diseases have essentially disappeared. This raises the question of why children are still required to receive large amounts of vaccinations at a young age. Another argument focuses on the financial motives. A statement released talked about the government benefiting trillions of dollars from vaccinations since 1994 (Whitney).
The argument encompassing whether or not parents should vaccinate their children is ongoing. It is a very interesting matter to learn about and I possess some strong feelings about the case. This issue interests me because there are parents who don’t have their children vaccinated, and there are parents who do have them vaccinated. But all these parents share one particular quality: they all would like for their kids to be safe.
Over the years, there has been much controversy surrounding the subject of childhood vaccinations. With differing opinions, many are in favor about childhood vaccinations being required for children. Children vaccinations have been proven to be an effective means of preventing serious effects, including fatalities, from childhood illnesses yet there is still controversy over whether the risk of side effects from the vaccines outweighs the risk of contracting diseases. The belief behind mandatory vaccinations has been linked to people wanting vaccinations to be required for children because it will prevent the spread of childhood diseases, but there are still questions and concerns around why childhood vaccinations should be required. Questions surrounding this topic are: why should vaccines be required, are there any serious risks involved in vaccinating your child, and should children be turned away from school if they do not have vaccinations? There is also the question of should these vaccinations be mandatory or should this solely be a choice that the parents of the child should make? In order for us to be able to take our stance on the subject, we need to examine the answers to the question.
Often debated, with strong convictions on each side, timely immunizations for children do more good then harm. Over the last few years, a phenomenon has come to our door steps. It used to be that all parents would immunize their children, without fail, because doctors told them to. In the past, the only non-immunized children were the children with health deficiencies. These children depended on the “herd” mentality. However, times are changing and parents are choosing to not immunize their children mainly based on these reasons: the possibility of them getting autism, parental lack of education about immunizations and lastly they believe that the illnesses that children are being immunized against are gone and immunizations are no longer needed.
“Prevention is better than cure.” This common statement could not relate any better than it does with the controversy surrounding the morality, effectiveness, and safety of childhood immunizations. The major argument is whether or not laws should be established to declare vaccination mandatory for all children. “The US food and Drug administration (FDA) regulates all vaccines to ensure safety and effectiveness,” (ProCon.org, 2012) therefor there should not be any reason to risk the health of any child. Vaccinating our children not only ensures their safety but also that of their future to come.
Can you imagine life without vaccine? In the reading "Not Being Vaccinated is not Acceptable" by David Ropeik argues that we should all get vaccinated because it’s necessary. Vaccinations are designed to help us go through our daily everyday life. A vaccine is a modern type of medicine that has been added to the world early on in life to prevent us all from diseases. It is called a modern medicine because of how many lives it has saved throughout the world. The earliest documented examples of vaccination are in the 17th century from India and China, people infected with smallpox were used to protect against the diseases. Vaccine have become better, to where they are safer for the human body. Vaccinations protect you and everyone around you, saves public money, protects future generations and it’s reliable.
“In 2011 alone, 1.5 million children died [worldwide] from diseases preventable by currently recommended vaccines” (“Immunization” 2). The magnitude of this tragedy is in part caused by the fact that some of those children simply weren’t reached by organizations like UNICEF, which aim to vaccinate children (“Immunization” 2). However, there are other reasons for the recent deaths and epidemics—such as the whooping cough epidemic of 2012, with 48,000 cases nationally in the United States—involving vaccine preventable diseases (McClay 1).
In contrast, a positive aspect of many people having vaccinations is herd immunity. Herd immunity is the occurrence where a large proportion of a specific population is vaccinated to provide them immunity, and as a result, it also gives some protection to the people of the population who have and yet developed immunity. This happens as the a large group of vaccinated individuals are protected from a virus and creates difficulty for the it to spread because there is only a small percentage of the population left that could be infected by the disease. It is a very crucial aspect of immunity for the community as the people who cannot receive vaccinations (i.e. people with weak immune systems, very young children and patients who are too ill)