The decision of the United Kingdom to leave the European Union has served in reshaping the way politics works in Europe. On June 3rd, 2016 a massive 30 million people came out to vote on the future of their countries. In the end, the vote to leave won 51.9% to 48.1%. Places like England and Wales both voted in favor of the exit, while Scotland and Northern Ireland voted overwhelmingly to stay in. While the long term effects of this decision obviously need time to be observed, the immediate economic impact has been somewhat mixed. The day after the vote was a cause for concern in that “the pound slumped after the referendum - and remains around 10% lower against the dollar and 15% down against the euro” (Wheeler 17). In contrast to this, …show more content…
Considering that this is the first time anyone has left the EU since joining, even these experts can’t say for certain what will really happen in this period of uncertainty. If the EU wants to send a message to anyone else who is thinking about leaving, it’s going to come in the form of severe restrictions on the U.K. President of the the European Union Jean-Claude Juncker has already claimed “Britain will divide the European Union's 27 remaining members by making different promises to each country during its Brexit negotiations” (Eyesenck). If true, this could be disastrous for relations between countries in the EU and European countries in general. To combat this, plans to integrate the Eurozone, who are the countries that use the Euro as their form of currency, are underway as a way to unite that group of countries.
It’s inevitable that one or more countries will eventually vote to leave the European Union. However, who will be the ones to do it is something that is harder to predict. It could be anyone from northern countries like Denmark and the Netherlands to strongly eurosceptic countries like France and Spain. Former leader of the U.K. independence party Nigel Farage is a strong believer in the domino effect and has said “other northern European countries will leave, starting with Denmark” (Stone 17). Obviously this isn’t just an overnight decision and many factors come into play when making this
Whether the United Kingdom decides to join the European single currency and replace the pound with the euro will have profound economic as well as political effects on the country so is a very important decision and has considerable variations in attitudes towards the topic, although the British public opinion has consistently opposed joining the euro. The euro is currency shared by 18 of the European Union's Member States. The euro was introduced in 1999 and automatically became the new official currency of 11 States, followed by another 7 countries joining to date. However, the UK negotiated an opt-out to from the Treaty meaning they don’t have to adopt the common currency as they fit a certain criteria [1]. Joining the European single currency can have major advantages for the UK, such as diminished uncertainty of exchange rate for businesses and the decreased need to pay transaction costs of changing currencies when abroad. It can also have disadvantages such as loss of domestic monetary policy and variable rate debt in the UK.
How likely is it that an integrated Europe will fall apart? What are the benefits and costs for Britain to leave the European Union?
What kind of harm will Britain pulling out of the European Union cause to the equilibrium, even with them taking precautions?
Lately in the EU, the economy has been booming, politics have been great, and trade is bigger than ever. What better time than now to leave the economic safety and success of the EU? Lately in the EU, the economy has been booming, politics have been great, and trade is bigger than ever. What better time than now to leave the economic safety and success of the EU?
This article explains the “on-going” argument of whether or not Britain should remain in the European Union or leave. Prime Minister David Cameron vowed to keep Britain apart, winning the backing of most of most of his Cabinet and the goal of rival parties. Cameron has made it clear Britain is safer and stronger in the EU. However, much of Britain believes in opposition to their membership among the the European Union, leaving this as a constant
The EU has its own currency called the euro which 19 of the 28 European states use. It is run by members of the European parliament, these members set rules that cover a wide range of areas such as rules on transport and business. Once a state becomes a member of the European Union they have a right to withdraw from the Union under the Treaty on the European Union. Article 50 in the Treaty on European Union states, “Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements." If the United Kingdom votes to leave the Union, they would be the first state to ever withdraw their membership.
So after the result of the referendum had been out, the first affect is the pound had fallen sharply, according to (Taub,A. 2016.) the pound is at its lowest valuation in seven years. Due to the (Hunt,A. & Wheeler,B. 2016) uncertainty rushing around, a British exit will likely result in a massive rebalancing of currencies. Investors will (and have already begun to) dive out of the British pound and into cash that's perceived as safe — the Swiss franc, the Japanese yen, the U.S. dollar. The changing direction of the investor and the fallen of the pound has spiked the value of Yen which has made Japan’s export being less competitive. Even the fallen of the pound can help the export business and attract more tourism to the country ,which due to the (bbc no name) The travel analytics firm ForwardKeys says flight bookings to the UK rose 7.1% after the vote. The import business still have to pay more for the fuel and material due to the costs which have increased 7.6%. Moreover, since 51% of goods and 45% of services of the British’s export are taken over by the EU. Losing access to the EU single market would mean less trade and less productivity growth which could (Chu,B.2016.)make
On Thursday 23rd of June, the UK decided to leave the EU via a referendum. This was a shock to not just the British public, but also the world as it resulted in a colossal level of uncertainty for everyone. But how did this unexpected result happen? One reason why the British public voted to leave the EU can be blamed upon the scaremongering that was proceeded by the British media. I will be focusing on the time period from 2004 until now because this is the period after the A8 (Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Estonia, Slovakia, Poland and Czech Republic) joined the EU.
Brexit is a term commonly known as Britain exiting from European Union membership. The historic referendum on the UK and EU membership held on June 23, 2016. Although majority of Londoner wanted to stay with EU, 52 percent voters voted to support the leave campaign to leave European Union. Since World War two the world saw a rising trend of economic development and globalization in Europe. Brexit has ended this trend. Since United
Although the final bill is not known, one thing is clear EU leaders will want to show there is a price for leaving the EU, while the UK will try its hardest to minimize it. With such large sums at stake there is plenty of negotiating to
On the other hand, the pro-EU party hold opposite opinions relative to Eurosceptics party. On the political front, the European Union is based on the law. Briton protected by the EU employment laws and social protection. Once UK secede from the EU means that Briton no longer protected by the European Union law (BBC, 2015). Then, EU is an important trading partner to Britain, seceding from EU, Britain have to face trade barrier, which means UK have to pay the tariffs when import and export (BBC, 2015). Furthermore, with the international manufacturers transfer to the low-cost countries inside the EU, UK would lose a large number of employment opportunities.
Britain withdrawing the European Union has always been an ongoing discussion, one of the many goals pursued by some British political parties, along with groups of people and individuals. Leaving the European Union is a right that every country that is part of the Treaty on the European Union has (Article 50 of the treaty), and this is what the Conservative political parties that proposed the referendum are triggering to impulse a faster withdraw from the EU; specially the new prime minister Theresa May. There had been another referendum in 1975, but it resulted in
Recently we have all become aware of the fact that Brexit has come as a shock to everybody. This unprecedented event caused turbulences both in the UK and in the EU because of it’s political and economical magnitude. As always, a lot of questions related to this topic have invaded newspapers and informative TV programs all over the world asking : “ Is the EU sinking or is it keeping afloat despite UK’s suddenly decision to leave?”. This will only depend on the how both of them manage to keep their sovereignty and succesfull coexist.
According to Kevin Lees, an attorney in Washington, D.C., an exit from the EU would almost certainly exclude Britain from the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. The TTIP is a major trade pact currently being negotiated between the EU and the US. The trade deal would add about £10 billion to the British economy annually and create thousands of jobs in the long term. The Obama administration has promised that Britain would be denied access to the TTIP if they chose to leave the EU (Geary and Lees, 2014).
In the article by Dhingra et al.(2016), authors gave two possible scenarios on Brexit issue: optimistic and pessimistic. In the optimistic scenario, Great Britain will purchase their budget for country needs and can obtain full success to the EU single market. In the pessimistic scenario, they assumed that UK may not be successful in negotiating with new countries. Along with this, they predicted Great Britain after Brexit will become an independent player and will use their freedom to negotiate with other world powers as China and United States without restriction. According to the Krotz (2017), Brexit will bring three possible scenarios: German hegemon, decline of European integration process and “back to the future”