Company is considering opening a new branch
1- Your company is considering opening a branch in a very low cost, low rights country. You are asked to provide a discussion paper on whether the company needs to worry about human rights in that country: a. To what extent is this worry just an issue of CSR with no real risk issues to review
To large extent the company should worry about the CSR. The reason for that is most of the FDI is long-term investments; therefore, the company should not view the human rights and CSR issues in terms of current liability only but from long term strategy.
Although the log cost and low rights in the workplace might motivate the company to open a branch in such state; however, if the company decided to be involved in such breaches this can lead to potential legal issues and it jeopardize its reputation even in its home state, i.e. Loblaw’s Joe Fresh and Bangladesh factory tragedy.
On the other hand, we might assess the Legal risk or issue as low due to the fact that most of the human rights treaties has no teeth and does not enact direct legal obligations on companies, therefore, it became part of the companies CSR. Prime example to that is the Multinational enterprise (MNE) as the MNE is not subject of the international law; consequently, the rights and obligations regarding human rights and CSR are fairly vague. On the same hand, the UN guiding principles are soft law as they impose “voluntary standards” for corporations. Nevertheless, it
Discussions regarding business and human rights in international organizations started in the late 20th Century, in the 1980s. International discussions began with the draft of the UN code of conduct on transnational corporations. Prior to the topic being brought up in the early 1980s, it was the prevailing view that businesses had only an indirect legal obligation to protect human rights. As an effect of the rapid spread of globalization as late as the 1990s, business and human rights began to gain more attention. In fact, the first major warnings from NGOs regarding human rights in business practices did not occur until 1991. Late 20th-century globalization catalyzed the human rights violations and therefore facilitated the NGO warnings and calls to action. NGOs like Amnesty International raised serious questions about the ability and willingness of businesses and national governments to abide by human rights when it is against the interests of their international trade. As a result, human rights responsibilities legislation regarding the public and private sectors gained traction in legislative bodies in the years directly leading up to 2000. The fight for human rights in international business practices continues today with manufacturing companies all around the world that export goods primarily to the US. This fight for human rights in business practices began in the final two decades of the 20th century because of the acceleration of
The major issues facing corporations is how to approach and manage the ethical problems in a corporate social responsible manner. Corporate responsibility is defined as the idea of social responsibilities supposing that the corporation has not only economic and legal obligations but also certain responsibilities to society that extend beyond these obligations (McGuire, 1963). Ethical behaviour is linked to acting in ways consistent with what the society and individuals typically think are good values that include honesty, fairness, equality, dignity, diversity and individual rights (WebFinance, 2016). Each multinational corporation has its own code of conduct, in it stating their regulations and behaviours that they are obliged to abide by. The main ethical concerns during employment in any organisation are discrimination and workplace healthy and safety, wages, child labour and rights are of the highest concern on the spectrum. Discrimination can be in the context of recruitment,
The inalienable human rights is something undeniably important in the view of everyone in the world, as nearly all government in the world have some sort of written law that ensure the rights of its citizens, like the Bill of Rights that protect the rights of Americans. Yet, when applying that significance in protecting human rights to people outside of their nation’s border depend considerably on the interests of the government, the interactions between the different nations, and the response concluded from the international institution, like the United Nations. As evident through the events in Rwanda, all members of the United Nation Security Council expressed their concerns and sadness about the human rights abuses in Rwanda by the Rwandan government, yet, when debating on the course of action, only a minority of the members actually supported humanitarian intervention in Rwanda. The violations on the principle of human rights in Rwanda were ignored as several council members cited the lack of funds and resources, along with infringement on sovereignty to be the reasons of nonintervention, despite the widespread support of these natural rights. Even if a proposal of intervention was passed, the movement to protect these human rights often failed due to the difficulty to come to a compromise when determine how the intervention would played out, as countries tried to pursue the policy in their own stance, as well as the crucial aspect of the response time. Although the
There has been a long drawn out debate on whether CSR should be catered for by law or one that should be left to individuals and organisations morality. Law, a coercive order, seeks to bring about a specific mode of human conduct by force, whereas morality which is a persuasive system appeals to the conscience of the individual required. A rule is a rule of morality if by common practice of the community, it applies only to the conscience of the addressee for ultimate compliance, but a rule is a rule of law if by the common practice of the community it will eventually be enforced by a power external to the addressee, i.e. the state or community. The extent to which law can be used to enforce morals has been the subject of expression in some decided cases. In England, Lord Denning in Shaw v. D.P.P. (1962) A.C P.220 advocated the view that the society reserves the right to use criminal law to preserve morality in the same way as the society uses criminal law to preserve anything it considers essential for its survival. Prof Hart in Knuller v. D.P.P. (1973) A.C. P.435, on his part suggested that that it was wrongful to enforce morality through the criminal law without first ensuring that failure to do so will endanger the social fabrics. Notwithstanding the divergent views, both writers agree that moral values are very important to the society and that there is need for law to uphold some moral position
Thirdly, in the global world, as a result of multinational employment, there are a plenty of CSR issues that are even much complex and difficult that before. One of the issues is extra- legal which is voluntary, not compulsory. Because of the voluntary, sometimes big companies do not follow the rule of CSR. For example, the famous brand like Nike faces tremendous pressure in order to be liable to employees. They arouse acrimony through the indirect business strategies such as providing low-cost conditions to labours. Hence, to be capable achieving liable, companies need to be responsible. In
When a company want to expand its activity in another country. Then he have to option in his hand.
There has been a long drawn out debate on whether CSR should be catered for by law or one that should be left to individuals and organisations’ notion of morality. Law, a coercive order, seeks to bring about a specific mode of human conduct by force, whereas morality which is a persuasive system appeals to the conscience of the individual required. A rule is a one of morality if by common practice of the community, it applies only to the conscience of the addressee for ultimate compliance, but a rule is a one of law if by the common practice of the community it will eventually be enforced by a power external to the addressee, i.e. the state or community. The extent to which law can be used to enforce morals has been the subject of expression in some decided cases. In England, Lord Denning in Shaw v D.P.P. (1962) A.C P.220 advocated the view that the society reserves the right to use criminal law to preserve morality in the same way as the society uses criminal law to preserve anything it considers essential for its survival . Prof Hart in Knuller v. D.P.P. (1973) A.C. P.435, on his part suggested that that it was wrong to enforce morality through the criminal law without first ensuring that failure to do so will endanger the social fabrics . Their divergent views aside, both writers agree that moral values are very important to the society and that there is need for law to uphold some moral position in the society
This essay will be advising and explaining remedies for Charlie, Sanya and The Rights to Safe Haven (RSF). By looking at the scenario, Charlie, Sanya and RSF can use HRA to encounter actions which was met by Bruddersfield police. This is shown when the police infringed and violated many articles of HRA which caused serious harm to the pressure group.
* Issues of human rights are constantly climbing up the business agenda. With various governments encouraging companies to take part in tackling these issues both domestically and globally, one can see
Multinational Corporations (MNCs) have been giving attention on not only their return on investment (Kraus & Brtitzelmaier, 2012) but also social issues, which have been threatening the environment as a result of their operational activities (Choi, Lee & Park, 2013). Therefore, MNCs do transform into socially responsible enterprises (Choi, Lee & Park, 2013) or behave in an ethical manner (Kraus & Brtitzelmaier, 2012) as the term called Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has appeared. The duties and responsibilities of Board of Directors (BOD) (corporate governance framework) (Stiglbauer & Velte, 2014) in MNCs plays a particularly important role in its transformational process since this process needs to be transparent (Choi, Lee, & Park, 2013). This paper evaluates and examines corporate governance codes, regulatory environment and CSR practices as well as review those codes presenting in the annual report and CSR practices by means of choosing McDonald’s as significant evidence which headquarters and runs its activities in United Kingdom as significant evidence. Some recommendations are provided regarding with its long-term CSR and corporate governance relationships in the final part of this paper.
After consideration and deliberation over the aforesaid economic and non-economic factors relating to the manufacturing and production of a company’s goods within the clothing industry, various companies recognized that they could maximize their profits, while maintaining their local corporate offices and distribution sites, by simply setting up manufacturing and production locations in countries with lower labor costs, compared to the country that the company’s headquarters is located. An example of this theory would be for a company to have its headquarters, or corporate offices, in Switzerland, while establishing manufacturing and production locations in a foreign country, such as Bangladesh. Among other factors to take into consideration, the impact that this approach can have on the company by increasing the company’s profit margin, by lowering production and labor costs, can be simply seen by comparing Switzerland’s average cost of labor (i.e. $35.00 per hour), to Bangladesh’s average cost of labor (i.e. $0.20 per hour). (Globalization Exercise # 2, slide 16).
Human rights have yet to become the major local approach to social justice as applied to the practice of early marriage in the Amhara Regional State, in Ethiopia. Currently, the language of rights in Ethiopia is intertwined with the formal law and the packaging of rights via government channels. There is negligible political space for the international human rights norms to penetrate the community without the intermediary role of government institutions and networks. This to the large part is attributed to the Charities and Societies proclamation No. 621/2009 of Ethiopia (CSO law) that came into force in January 2010. The CSO law prohibited foreign non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from engaging in activities pertaining to
Human rights are rights that are believed to belong justifiably to every person no matter what situation, race, or gender. The people get to decide what is wrong and right, from voting, to being treated unequal, being called a minority, to there being government officials mistreating the way humans view things. “Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, whatever our nationality, place of residence, sex, national or ethnic origin, color, religion, language, or any other status. We are all equally entitled to our human rights without servitude and compelling victims to commit sex acts for the purpose of creating discrimination.” ("Ckmgrey." Ckmgrey. Web. 17 Apr. 2016.) These rights are what protect us, they help all of us such as difrent genders, and race. Human rights were given to us to protect us from harm but there are evil people who do not care and will make you feel like you’re nothing and not worthy of rights. Human trafficking makes people feel like they’re nothing and or maybe even would rather kill themselves then have to live through all the painful things those people do.
In this week, we focused on human rights, and the many different human right violations. Human rights are the rights and laws inherited to every human being despite their gender, social status, nationality, religion, or color. Last week we mentioned a few human right violations and discrimination issues. For instance, in the video A Force More Powerful, part 1 talks about several acts of disobedience provoked by the violation of rights of various members of some ethnic groups. The act of disobedience that affected me the most was African-Americans attempt to eliminate segregation in the south, and Gandhi’s technique to fight segregation in a non-violent approach.
Human rights are a basic right for every living person on Earth. Regardless of differences, every person has the right to basic needs in order to sustain their life. A current issue in Florida involves a law, HB 401, which will be active in July of this year that affects members of the LGBT community as well as those who wish to practice exercising their religious freedoms. Choosing to live life with morals and values that are highly ethical might differ from person to person. One group should not be allowed to interfere with the basic human rights of another group in order to further their own agenda. Non-biased members of communities could assist both groups in working together to find a peaceful solution that respects everyone 's basic human rights.