The Hebrew prophets are filled with varied imagery and language, from the colorful language of the visions Ezekiel’s Temple (Ez. 40-48), to the literary techniques of judgement oracles (Isa. 13), to the laments of Jeremiah (Jer. 12). However, no other rhetorical device should cause its audiences, both original and modern, to squirm with discomfort more than the prophetic metaphors that speak negatively of feminine sexuality and propagate misogynistic abuse towards women. These metaphors, graphic and violent, often portray the people of Israel as dishonored, sexually promiscuous women who have shamed their husbands. As an African-American woman and Old Testament scholar, Renita J. Weems deals with these difficult metaphors to understand …show more content…
An attitude of patriarchy places a high expectation on the oldest male in the household as the authority of the household, his wife (or wives) included. With this, a woman’s sexual experience was owned by the man in authority over her. Any illicit sexual activity of a woman under the authority of a man would have been a slight towards the patriarchal expectations and would be considered shameful for the man, his household, and the woman involved. As a result, ancient society would have expected the husband to act violently in response to any such dishonor put brought upon him by his wife. With these cultural mores in mind, the Prophets’ choice in a marriage metaphor would have been a valuable tool in their rhetorical aim. Weems states:
After all, marriage and family norms were central to maintaining and perpetuating Israel’s Patriarchal culture, and dismantling the marriage relationship, as surely a wife’s adultery threatened to do, posed a threat to every patriarchal household… [the prophets] attempted to find an angle of vision that could tap into the most cherished interests and values of their audience.
However, Weems argues that the shocking part of these metaphors is not the misogynistic violence towards the women. Instead, it is the prophetic connection between the actions of Israel, Judah, and Jerusalem and the actions of these culturally dishonorable women. The prophet’s undoubtedly
Dr. Horney’s second cause, as she explains, can be traced to “certain traits of male psychology” (343). The basic paradox of man’s attitude towards women is, “even men who consciously have a very positive relationship with women and hold them high in high esteem as human beings.” They get this from the experience they had from their mothers. Then, she goes to the “attitudes of men towards women during various eras of history and in different cultures.” Also, she insists in regards to “sexual relationships with women, but also, and often more so, in nonsexual situations, such as in their general evaluation of women” (344). She then gives us an example: Adam and Eve. She tells us that “the Old Testament is outspokenly patriarchal.” She argues that there is “no maternal goddess.” Then, she goes on to remind that the two stories in the bible are both “male bias.” She thinks that the stories of Adam and Eve “have damaged the relationship between the sexes from the earliest times to the present” with two elements: “one born out of resentment, the other out of anxiety.”
So this obviously means that the Prophet isn’t giving a woman a right to do this, but it was a way for the woman to wind up her husband! If he continued to have a problem with the other man then she could tell him that here’s one way to resolve the situation. That would proper freak him out and he’d never allow it! So this enabled him to deal with the
In the Hebrew Bible, the Book of Genesis and the Greek play Medea, by Euripides, contain female characters that can be seen as complex and have significance and meaning in the text. There are many interpretations involving the female characters, some characters may be portrayed as weak and irrational or strong-willed and wise. I will argue that, women are portrayed in the Hebrew Bible and Medea as irrational and senseless, in order for the men to be portrayed as superior and for women to be seen as inferior. This idea of the female characters being irrational and senseless can be seen in Genesis 4, Genesis 18, Genesis 29, and throughout the Medea play.
From birth until marriage women were taught to retain their virginity because a woman's physical form was all she truly owned. After a women had given this worldly possession away they had no leverage and was expected to care of children and maintain the household. Loss of virginity before marriage or a lack of affection for her children were grave accusations on a woman's moral character. A woman that enjoyed sex before marriage was seen as disgraced in the eyes of God and the community. Sensationalized accounts of disgraced women appeared in magazines and stories to remind future mothers of the importance of keeping their gift. Women had to personify purity and patience, while functioning as the head of the house, all while being completely overruled by the wishes of their
Since the dawn of the Patriarchy there has been a very apparent attack on women and what it means to be a woman (Daly 44-45). This popular theory of misogyny in the Western world first surfaced in 1973 when radical feminist Mary Daly published “Beyond God and the Father: Toward a Philosophy of Women’s Liberation (Daly 44-45).” Within the pages of Daly’s book lies controversial attacks of biblical text, more specifically the story of Adam of Eve alongside a call for action for women and men to undo the brainwashing that years of conditioning has caused them (Daly 44-45).
Introduction Misogyny is a dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women. When dealing with misogyny, one would have to have a subjective opinion about women. The basis of subjectivity is the relationship to the way a person experiences things in his or her own mind. If God’s thoughts are subject how does that affect His relationship with women? Some may agree that there are verses in the Bible that sound misogynistic; however, there are some verses convey women in a positive manner.
In ancient Greece, wives were obligated to be faithful to their husbands. If women were disloyal, husbands could punish their wives by divorcing them and excluding them from public ceremonies, which would give unfaithful wives the reputation of social outcasts. However, a double standard existed in Greek society: while the fidelity of women was expected, husbands could own prostitutes and sleep with female slaves (Massey 5). Sappho challenged this convention because although she was married to a wealthy man named Cercylas, she had three female students and three female companions with whom she was romantic (Lightman et al. 206).
As the Wife explains, she used her sexual power to dominate her husbands. In an essay put out by Portland state University, it says that "In the Middle Ages, many members of the Church began to see sex and lust as a sin created by The Fall." This is further shown in Scripture itself in many places, one of them being 2 Corinthians 12:21:
The status of women in Palestine during the time of Jesus was very decidedly that of inferiors. The women is, ‘in all things inferior to the man,’ as stated by first century
The church’s interpretation of the women is that the husband is the head of her and she should be subjected to him (The New American Bible, Ephesians 5: 22-24). In the wife of bath, her fifth husband was questioning his wife, because of all what was written of bad wives by men (Wife of Bath, pg 699). The Thousand and One Nights is centered on a good king who was deceived and hurt by his wife, which twisted his morality. He vowed to marry a woman each night and in the morning he would kill her. The king’s daughter, Shahrazad, decided to take a stand and marry the king. With her intelligence and storytelling, she was able not only to save her own life, but her kingdom as well (The Thousand and One Nights, pg 554). Shahrazad was a good wife even if it meant risking her life. Men has an impact on his wife. Yes, he is superior to her, but he needs to bring her to holiness and reciprocate her love. Husbands love your wife as much as you love your own bodies (The New American Bible, Ephesians 5:28). Make sure your wife lacks blemish and bring her to holiness and without blame
The first chapter in “Song of Solomon” immediately sets a precedence for the traditional gender roles for this particular community of the man working and of the woman taking care of domestic duties and ensuring her outward appearance matched the societal expectations (Morrison 3-4). The Author writes “men were at work; and most of the women were fastening their corsets and
The biblical allusions Gwynn makes are used to expose the problem of societal pressures women face as a result of biblical teachings. When unhappy and doubtful of such teachings, the church “instantly referred [her] to text in Romans/ And Peter’s First Epistle, chapter III.” (7-8), a biblical reading that preaches the act of suffering for God’s will and the obedience of a woman to her husband as she is the “feebler vessel”. However, Gwynn points out the flaw of this instruction when he portrays what a sinner her husband is as he “grabbed [his] pitchforks, donned [his] horns, / and sped to the contravene the hopes of heaven, / Sowing the neighbors’ lawns with tares and thorns.” (10-12).
The Bible is controversial on the matter of gender equality. There are numerous contradictions about the status of women in Christian society. Historically, the most prominent interpretation has been rather negative toward women. The Christian Church, with principally male authority, emphasizes the idea that women are inferior to man. They focus on Eve’s sin leading to a punishment that “her husband will have authority over her.” (Drury, 34)
In the novel, Song of Solomon, most of the women are mistreated, and men are seen as the superior. This book addresses feminism from various perspectives. Feminism is the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. Throughout the novel, women are not treated equally. Men automatically assume that women will take the “motherly role” and take care of all the children. All the women seem to have to reach this “beauty standard,” or else they will be embarrassed. Most of the women are sexually objectified by the men, also. Overall, it appears that men have too much control of the opposite sex in Song of Solomon. There is only a small portion of women who are independent of men, but those who are get rejected by
Most readers pass over the mention of the foreign wives who the narrator suggests were practicing abominations as past enemies of the Israel. Most people assume that these women were strange and foreign just because Ezra and the narrator said so. In this exegesis paper I will ask three questions Why was there opposition to the strange and foreign women? Were they foreign women or were they Jewish women? Lastly what was the status of women’s roles and rights in Post exilic Israel? "Interpreters of Ezra 9:1-15 usually focus on obedience and turning the people back to God. However, I will argue that Ezra uses marriage to foreign women as a trope to explain how the returned exiles from Babylon are the true Israel and not the people in the land who weren 't taken captive."