The Glasgow Science Centre Tower Project Case Study Essay

To begin, after the site has been chosen several lengthy steps must follow, the site location meets all regulatory, environmental, historical and municipal zoning requirement approvals. Additionally, the property on which the tower will be constructed must be free and clear of all encumbrances and mortgages usually 100’ x 100’ square foot area of property. When all those steps are successfully completed and approved the construction can now move forward with a notice to proceed. There will be a site visit organized for the bidding process inviting pre-approved contractors, civil engineers,

She submitted the thesis to her professor who informed LeMessurier of the discrepancies of the building design. A fatal flaw was discovered in the building design which was the skyscraper’s bolted joints. The joints were too weak to withstand 70-mile-per hour wind gusts, while on the other hand welded joints were able to withstand wind gusts. When calculating the buildings structure, LeMessurier calculated wind load perpendicular (north, east, south, or west) to building rather than quartering winds (northeast, northwest, southeast, or southwest). During construction, to minimize time and cost, bolted joints were used rather than welded joints which substantially weakened the buildings infrastructure. In order to fix the problem, Citicorp hired a crew of welders to fix the joints, resulting in 10 million dollars spent and taking roughly 8

Risk management attempts to recognize and manage potential and unforeseen trouble spots that may occur when the project is implemented (Larson & Gray F, 2003). So, risk management will allow the project manager of “The Renovation of the Terminal B at LaGuardia Airport” identify as many risk event as possible, minimize their impact, manage response to those risks that do materialize, and therefore provide

The Clifton Suspension bridge is world famous and one of the essential things to see in the West Country. It is a beautiful piece of engineering that is lovely maintained by the bridge staff. The two towers of the bridge span from Clifton to summerset, the Clifton tower is build on a solid rock surface that acts as a foundation, however the summerset tower needed a massive brick buttress before work on the tower could begin. The towers though similar are not identical. The towers are similar in size, the main differences

Clark Eldridge, an engineer from Washington State, had designed a trusted, conventional suspension bridge that would cost eleven million dollars. He requested that amount from the Federal Public Works Administration. However, Leon Moisseiff developed a design modification that would make the total cost of building the bridge much less- only eight million dollars. He swapped out the twenty-five feet long sturdy trusses as the form of support for the much cheaper alternative of 8 foot long girders, which were proven to be an insufficient form of support from the collapse of this bridge. His design accounted for an overall thinner bridge; and since his was the cheaper option, it was chosen for construction. However, the width of the bridge in comparison to the length, as well as the absence of trusses which would provide stability, are both part of Moisseiff’s “cost-effective”, yet impractically unsafe design. Since his design was flawed, he is mainly responsible for the bridge collapse. However, the board of engineers who approved his design are also partially responsible for the bridge collapse, as this unsafe design was allowed to be constructed. Meanwhile, it is imperative to remember that theories on aerodynamics were not fully developed as of the time that this bridge was constructed. Therefore, the full effect of oscillating forces was not properly accounted for due to the

(cite) explained that risk management is the decision-making process to identify threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of the threats on business objectives. In the Blue Spider (BS) project, it was clear from the beginning that the organization did not manage risk properly. The problem began when Henry Gable, as the director of engineering, made the unethical decision to lie about the project specifications. The unethical decision by Gable would be the key reason of many risks faced by Gary Anderson throughout the project. Furthermore, (cite) explained that there are five risk response strategies that an organization could take. The strategies are listed as mitigating risk, avoiding risk, sharing risk, retaining risk, and transferring risk. It is clear that Anderson did not maintain risk assessment and response plan since the beginning of the project.

The improvement of the skyscraper structures starts from 10 floor stories to high as 150 floor stories high. The Reliance Building Chicago, USA, in 1895, 15 stories high used the semi-rigid steel frame. The semi-rigid steel frame was held together with steel beams and connected by rivets. (Bennett, P.42) The 60 stories high First Wisconsin Center, Milwaukee, USA in 1974 employed the steel belt truss with framed shear truss. This structure used the horizontal trusses at the upper and lower stories to enhance the framed shear truss. (Bennett, P.44) The Sears Tower, Chicago, USA, in 1974, 110 stories high used the Bundled tube. The bundled tubes were made up of a cluster of connected frame tubes, reinforced by steel beams at each story to increase the strength of the structure. Various tubes terminated at different level to further strengthen the bundled tubes at the center. (Bennett, P.44) The future structure was the Superframe, which can reaches at least 150 stories high. It used the concept of the Eiffel Tower with framed tubes connected by horizontal trusses. (Bennett, P.45) It was the innovation of the structural design that enables skyscrapers to reach new height. These methods include the use of

Extremely tall buildings were inefficient since structural support and elevators took up huge amounts of interior space. The exterior walls were design to hold much of the weight of the towers and as well as all of the wind loads. The only internal support for the buildings was a central support of towers. Elevators were placed in the shafts that were formed by the columns. These engineering considerations determined the towers basic design. (PBS, 2000-2001)

After the project is finished, the estimates of risk can be reviewed and compared to the events that actually took place. Did events occur that were unforeseen? What cues existed that may have allowed the team to predict these events? Was the project contingency sufficient to cover unforeseen risks? Even if nothing went wrong on this project, it is not proof that risk mitigation was a waste of money, but it is useful to compare the cost of avoiding risk versus the cost of unexpected events to understand how much it cost to avoid risk.

We can see that loads are transferred from the trusses to the columns then into the foundation of the building. Engineers always assume that the loads are uniformly distributed through any building they design. I was impressed that the roof trusses are well design in the building, which shows a significant engineering work. The exposed features of roof trusses give its own uniquely design and show the glory of such engineering work.

Many project managers focus so intensely on the effort and events around creation of the deliverables that they had forgotten about the other elements associated in making the project a success. Technical risk may lead to possible impact that could have occur in a project when an implementation does not work as wanted. Risks can be in terms of major and minor effects on projects. Technical risks can be a big problem if it is not handled properly. The NASA did not handled risks effectively where it may blow up any time. The night before the space shuttle was launched, a contractor and five engineers had informed managers to hold the activity as the engineers discovered the O ring rubber seals, a vital component of the shuttle had failed a few times in sealing from bad weathers. If the technical risks are not taken into consideration, it would provide sufficient impact towards the overall process that may even lead to death and injuries as similar to the Space Shuttle incident in year 1986.

On the first day of camp the students of Glen Osmond Primary did the Tower Challenge. They did this under the high ropes at Glenhaven Park. The students did this because it was one of the activities. The main point was to build a tower out of milk crates and get the climber up to the top. The highest number of crates the Glen Osmond Primary students got at the camp was 13, Maxx was the climber. The highest ever tower was 22 milk crates by year 9’s.

There were many risk involved with the project. First, the project did have a main person in charge or a group that had the main authority to communicate all information relating the project and take necessary steps to control scope, risk, cost and requirements of the project. Another risk was the time completion of the project which, was not very realistic given the size of the project and requirements. The October 1 deadline release put lots of pressure on the team to complete the project on time and at any cost. Third, the development method chosen for the project was agile approach which, did

The Citicorp Tower in New York City originally had an extreme design flaw that could have caused catastrophic damage to the city. The design of the building incorporated the use of nine story stilts constructed in the middle of each side. The structure of the building implemented a chevron bracing design to make the building significantly lighter to reduce swaying during windy conditions. William LeMessurier, the structural engineer, designed the building based on strong perpendicular winds, but failed to account for the quartering winds that strike the building’s corners. LeMessurier concluded that there was a fault in the design and a high probability of an incident occurring in the future. The building would later hate additional structural

Site for construction of KATE TOWER is considered feasible not only in market and economic terms but also for construction.