The Earth's Need for Population Limitation Laws Essay

With this in mind, this is essentially a two-part problem; one, who is responsible for regulating who gets the water, and two, what is to be done about the increasing populations combined with the

Development: As the population grows there is need for urban development which could be intrusive on the

The farmers need water for their crops and I don’t think that they want to grow less crops, also the people that don’t get a lot of water or anyone that does should get the water.

In other words, “Ordinarily, people think that wealth is increased and life is far more attractive and thrilling; for if this were not so, who would be drawn into New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, Philadelphia…”(Mumford). The development of skyscrapers was only introduced for cities to boast about the amount of money they have, so then people would be captivated by a city's image and heighten their reputation. A consequence of this action is the establishment of multiple skyscrapers creates a safety hazard for the public. Namely, if there was ever an earthquake that was strong enough to cause the skyscrapers to break apart, people’s lives would be in danger as the people would be trapped inside or the debris would be crashing down upon the streets (Twenties in Contemporary Commentary, The). Public services such as policemen or firefighters were not equipped or prepared to handle these types of situations, if one was ever to occur. Skyscrapers were not only a waste of money, but a result of this impractical building could harm the lives of citizens living in

However, in most cases, the people living there do not even know the risks. Humans should have learned from the 1906 quake that the San Andreas fault line is too dangerous to live on. The 1906 earthquake should have been a mistake that was learned from. The knowledge gained from the past will be useless if it is unused. People can do all they want to “earthquake proof” the cities, but in the end, when the next big one strikes, lives and money will still be lost. Knowing all the risks there are to living on the San Andreas fault line, it is very clear that it is not a safe place for people to

An emerging issue is that of urban sprawl. While some aspects of urban sprawl has been seen since ancient times, this phenomenon has started gaining the most momentum in the past century, aided by the advancement of technology, especially with the rise of mass produced automobiles, houses and highway systems. Many people unknowingly contribute to this environmental problem, as is the nature of it. Urban sprawl deals with the growth of the suburbs, the area between the urban and rural areas of a city. Most of America’s largest cities and states, in terms of population, are prime examples of urban sprawl. Opponents of urban sprawl usually cite the government as a major cause of sprawl. The government may be a major catalyst of

Naturally, cities are able to support a bigger population. There are more homes, jobs and resources, but with a bigger population also comes a greater amount of pollution. With more people comes the need for more energy, water, food and space, essentially using up a significant amount of the earth’s natural resources.

It is such an elating feeling to have witnessed cities came back from the ashes of natural calamities that once shook its grounds. We all have seen terrible things happening everyday such as massive earthquakes, destruction brought about by unexpected tsunami and a fearsome landfall of a humongous storm from the Pacific, and yet, it is just heartwarming to have noticed cities after cities getting back on track after the calamity. You might have heard of the city called Ancud, based in Chile, before on your Latin American class, but despite the old notion of the city as an affluent one, it have dramatically been changed with a more adept tagging. After the 1960 earthquake that crumbled the elite city of Ancud, locals have been resilient with rebuilding their

“The scale of the disaster may lead one to conclude that casualty and damage effects should have been significantly higher. However, over the last two decades, Japan made significant investments in nationwide disaster risk mitigation infrastructure. The country currently invests approximately 1.2% of its government’s budget on disaster mitigation — a rate far above that of other industrialized countries. These investments include a ductile, earthquake-resistant design for new structures and retrofitting older construction, not just in Tokyo but across the nation. This investment resulted in the majority of buildings withstanding the original 9.0-magnitude quake and its sustained aftershocks.” (Tomodachi Analysis)

Rapid urbanisation has caused a variety of problems, including transport congestion, lack of sufficient homes and living conditions, sanitary and health care issues, and crime. For all these problems, city planners have attempted potential solutions, each with varying degrees of success. Cities including London, Manila and Mumbai have several of the aforementioned problems, and have each tried their own potential solutions. This essay will discuss how successful these schemes have been in resolving these issues.

A megacity is a relatively new term that stands to be defined. A megacity is more elaborate than an average city in my areas of interest. It exceeds the characteristics of an average city in population, infrastructure, culture, and poverty. Although megacities may look rather attractive to an individual that resides in a rural area, megacities come with their own set of advantages and disadvantages. They may seem like modern day utopias yet they also have their flaws. Even so, megacities have dominated this planet and we can surely predict the growth of more megacities to come.

Los Angeles is built on the vast and flat landscape; it was their opportunity to grow fast as a metropolitan. With this environment, the constant influx of population was enough to generate a significant community even outside of downtown. The urban sprawl started on its endless horizontal ground. However, soon they confronted the limit of the carrying capacity. L.A couldn’t handle its urban sprawl; it needed a solution to keep growing. Los Angeles couldn’t deal with the increasing housing demand and lacking of public space. Compared to other metropolitan, such as New York, Los Angeles showed the dramatic comparison in population density. “The urbanized area of Los Angeles was the densest in the country in 1990, more so than even New York City. The 2000 figure for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana Urbanized area is 7,068 people per square mile, compared to 5,309 for the New York, New jersey-Connecticut urbanized area.”(Grey 90) In detail, 90 districts of L.A have more than 10,000 people per square mile. Especially Koreatown has the biggest number which is “42,000 square per mile” (LA times Sewell 2016). After decades, when it confronted its housing problem due to unaffordability, people finally realized there is no suburban area for them to move or build new housings in Los Angeles. They reached their limit of growing. “Unnerving lesson in man’s infinite capacity to mess up his environment.”(Grey 238) The population kept larger, the price of housing also increased. “Los

The concept of urban sustainability stemmed from the expectation of large population influx within the next 50 years to major cities. If no sustainable plans were implemented prior to the population growth, the sudden increase in carbon footprint, household and transportation greenhouse gases, and so on could potentially worsen some severe global phenomena such as climate change or extreme weather conditions (Kammen & Sunter, 2016). As a result, in major cities like Paris, the integration of

Urbanization can be defined as the physical growth of population increasing in urban areas. By 2050, it is predicted that 64.1% and 85.9% of the developing and developed world respectively will be urbanized, compared to 1800 where only about 2% of the world’s population lived in urban areas (Urbanization). Urbanization is necessary to sustain growth in developing countries. Urbanization changes the social and environmental landscape across the globe. The increase in world population has tripled the urban population. The most striking examples of the urbanization of the world are the megacities of 10 million or more people. In 1975, only four megacities existed; in 2000, there were 18. In addition, by 2015 the UN estimates that there will be 22 (Urbanization: an Environmental Force). Urbanization does lead to some positive benefits as well as many negative benefits. Public health is a growing risk associated with urbanization, specifically air pollution that has a significant effect on the overall health of urbanized communities lowering the quality of life.

Osaka prefecture is located off the coastline of a secluded bay on the eastern central portion of the Japanese archipelago. It has a population of roughly 8.8 million people. Osaka used to have the second highes population of Japan but has recently dropped to third next to Tokyo and Kanagawa. It is home of several man-made islands, one of which is Kansai Inrenational Airport, and several other off-coast architectural miracles of modern day ingenuity. Osaka is a beautiful place to live and is also one of the safest places to live in the world as far as crime and pollution are concerned. On the extreme other hand it is THE most dangerous place to be in the world when it comes to natural disasters. The entire Japanes Archipelago is riddled with volcanoes and subject to earthquakes that occur daily due to the fact that it is located on the subduction zone of the Pacific, North American and Eurasion tectonic plates and is also one of the hottest spots on the “ring of fire”. It is also home to the Tsunamis that follow periodically after especially strong earthquakes occur. These disasters bring forth coastal erosion, landslides and potential coastal flooding that would seem to be devastating to the population of Japan and especially of Osaka, being secluded in its own private bay area and surrounded by mountains on all other sides. On the contrary, the Japanese poulation is thriving and have somehow learned to coexist with these difficulties and learned to incorporate some of