preview

The Early Save And Clinical Deterioration Essay

Decent Essays

1.1) Based on the data presented, do you think the EARLY SAVE program has been effective in improving early recognition and response to clinical deterioration in your hospital? Why/ why not? From what we can analyse based on the graph and sample sizes, the ‘EARLY SAVE’ has proven to be effective in improving early recognition and response to clinical deterioration in your hospital due to the positive changes in sample sizes from Pre ‘EARLY SAVE’ to Post ‘EARLY SAVE’. In regards to patient outcomes following Code Blue and MET calls (as a percentage), the change from the provided data indicates that the implementation of the ‘EARLY SAVE’ program has had a positive effect on the number of patients remaining on ward. The change in percentages of the variables ‘Could not be resuscitated (died)’ and ‘Transferred to ICU’ has been allocated to the fourth variable ‘Remained on ward’, resulting in an increase in its percentage. An percentage increase in ‘Remained on ward’, and a decrease in ‘Could not be resuscitated (died)’ and ‘Transferred to ICU’ means that more patients were able to be saved, which is a positive indication (Reinhart et al., 2012). Since the implementation of ‘EARLY SAVE’, the number of MET Calls of Pre ‘EARLY SAVE’ has increased from 160 to 360, which is a 125% increase. . A higher sample size correlates with positive effectiveness because more patients could be saved since action to treat the deteriorations could be taken earlier. Additionally, the hospital is

Get Access