The Crucible Play Analysis

A theme in The Crucible is that a society ruled by theocracy and status based on religion is bound to fall apart. Salem 's strict adherence to the Christian shurch is evident in everything the citizens do. They use measures of a person 's knowledge and adherence to the religion as a means of judging their character and also their status in society. They believe "God [was] provoked so grandly by such a petty cause" (121), which is why the "jails are packed" (121). If the citizen did anything to make God angry, they were punished. This is why the judges were so relentless and naïve in putting the accused women to trial and convicting them. They believed "the law, based upon the Bible, and the Bible, writ by the Almighty God,

In the crucible there has been a character and or characters that were afraid to admit they were wrong. In certain situations I have gone through the same situation before, so I can relate to that. First, with the crucible, Rev. John Hale would be afraid to admit that he was wrong. John Hale is a witch expert from Beverly, he comes to Salem to check out what is going on as far as witchcraft. He thinks he knows everything and is very arrogant about it. He has not seen anything like this before. Things are happening in Salem such as people going into a coma, and people going against each other.

The Crucible, a play written by Arthur Miller, is a chronological narrative including a large cast of characters with a constantly moving setting.* The Crucible is a dramatization of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692 and an allegory of the McCarthyism period. Throughout the play, Miller explores the destruction of freedom by the ignorant and tyrannical society in which his characters live.* By exhibiting how easily a member of the community can become an outcast, Arthur Miller displays social criticism in the Puritan society as well as in today's society in The Crucible.

The text and film adaptation of The Crucible complement each other, catching the essence of Arthur Miller’s central themes and messages. Although the film reiterates the theme and the basis of the play, there are many differences to contrast. The film featured scenes that were merely referenced in the text, allowing the audience to fully grasp the storyline. These additions are also necessary to convey emotions and accentuate important attributes of the characters.

In 1953 a play is written by Arthur Miller, a man questioned by the House Representatives for believing in a communist reform. A man who had refused to give up the names of others at communist meetings would be convicted of contempt of Congress, issued a fine, given a prison sentence, blacklisted, and even disallowed a US passport. All this lead to Arthur Miller writing a play called The Crucible. A play which was set in Salem, Massachusetts in the years 1692-93, the time of the Salem Witch Trials. One of the points Miller expressed was history repeating itself, showing that America was going on a “witch hunt” for those who believed in communism, just as the people of Salem went on a witch hunt for those who practiced witchcraft. Miller, having historical accuracy in his play, got the point across that history had repeated itself, yet the historical accuracy might not have been perfect in the play, mainly because plays can overlook environmental detail and will change aspects of events to add a sense of drama. Following the play were filmed adaptions which were more likely to be accurate historically since films are given more freedom with sites they can film at and editing that can be done to further enhance an event in history. The film adaptions of The Crucible are more accurate than any stage performance of it for three simple reasons; Consistency, the portrayal of characters/environments, and the addition of historical detail.

The question starts in chapter 11. Peter encounters an astonishing disclosure that God is putting forth "the repentance that leads to life” (Acts 11:18) to Gentiles without obliging them to become Jews first. Be that as it may, when he goes to Jerusalem in the company of some uncircumcised (Gentile) men, some of the Christians there whine that he is abusing Jewish law (Acts 11:1-2).

The play The Crucible, was written by Arthur Miller in 1953. It is a story he wrote after his own experience being accused of communism. This affected a lot of well-known people in the United States during this time, and was considered a witch hunt similar to the Salem witch hunts. Arthur Miller wrote The Crucible about a man, John Proctor, who has an affair with Abigail Williams. She catches feelings for him and tries to cast a spell on John Proctor’s wife to kill her; this gets out of hand when Abigail’s uncle catches her and some other girls dancing during the spell in the woods. Suddenly, the whole town is living in fear of who is practicing witchcraft, who could be a witch, and innocent people are killed if they don’t confess to being witches. Overall, mass fear and panic, and false accusations are seen over and over throughout the play.

The Crucible is an award winning 1953 playwright that was composed by American author, Arthur Miller. The play takes place in the time of the 1600’s Salem Witch Trials and tells a story of 17 year old Abigail Williams who has an affair with well entrusted family man, John Proctor. When Williams is caught in what seems to be a conjuring of spirits in the forest one morning, she faces accusations of witchcraft which would result in a hefty charge if pleaded guilty; death. Understanding the price for such a crime, Williams comes up with a lie to cover up her tracks. The playwright has had many runs in the production industry and even appeared on movie screens in the late of 1996. However, when looking at the movie and the play there are many differences that can be seen when looking at the two side by side. While the movie and the play do indeed have some similarities, they also have some differences that are very much apparent in terms of how the characters are portrayed and the scenes that had been cut out as well as the script having some altercations when transforming this playwright into a major motion picture. When zooming out and discovering the differences between the two it is obvious to see that the playwright is and always will be the better of the duo.

The Crucible, an original play written by Arthur Miller, has had a multitude of adaptations come out after its’ release in 1953. Among these adaptations are the movie, The Crucible, directed by Nicholas Hytner and starring Daniel Day-Lewis and Winona Ryder and local performances of the play, such as the one seen at the Civic Theatre. The Crucible is about the people of Salem, MA and trouble of the accusations of witchery after Abigail, the niece of Reverend Parris, has an affair with the married John Proctor and he denies her when she attempts to do it again. Specifically, Abigail’s reaction to the rejection in the movie is portrayed so much more realistic than it is in the play and the entire cast portraying their characters realistically for how it was appropriate for the setting of the movie. Although the movie was exceptional in content, the universal portrayal of the characters was better in the movie. Overall, The Crucible movie version, directed by Nicholas Hytner, portrayed the characters better the play because Winona Ryder portrayed Abigail Williams better than the written play did, and the cast as a whole worked together to create the mood of the historical time period of both the Salem Witch Trials and the communist era. Additionally, even though the written play was amazing due to it being ‘first’, the movie was still better at portraying the development of the characters.

Arthur Miller is considered one of the greatest American playwrights of the 20th century. He has written many acclaimed plays, including The Crucible. Written in 1953, The Crucible uses the historical perspective of the Salem Witch Trials which took place between 1962 and 1963. A lot of the inspiration for the events that take place in the play were from the McCarthyism era that was taking place at the time. It is evident that The Crucible is a critical look at the way the Communist hunt was handled, and used the hysteria and madness of the witch trials to show how history repeats itself. The relationship between men and women and the way the woman in the society is treated is also a prominent theme throughout the play.

The Crucible by Arthur Miller is a famous play which was written in the early 1950’s. The Crucible is a play based upon the events in 1692, which led to the ‘Salem Witch Trials’, a series of hearings before local magistrates to prosecute over 150 people accused of witchcraft. This was due to the hysteria caused by a group of girls accusing innocent people of witch craft. The play was set in Salem, Massachusetts between February 1692 and May 1693. Salem was a very isolated and puritanical community, so their biggest fear was the devil and witchcraft. A person being accused of witchcraft was the worst thing possible in this society.

History plays a huge role that can’t be changed while the play such as the Crucible can amend to match what modern theater expects. Either the script or events can take a toll and can surprise the audience at any second with drama, death, or maybe a turn on events making the story a little good from bad. Since the first screening of The Crucible to the first events in Salem, both are on events that impacts the human race to this day by showing how brutal and how far they took their religion. Then again both stories told are a lot more different than what you expect because of the way Arthur Miller distributes parts of the story differently from that of history. For real Salem history cannot be changed by now but a play like The Crucible can to set a different point of view for the crowd.

The Crucible is an arguably interesting story. It is a story about the Salem witch trials that took place in the Province of Massachusetts Bay during 1962-1963. The author of the dramatized and partially fiction story is the American playwright Arthur Miller. There are two different form of the story written by Miller, a play and a movie. The play and movie have many differences and contrasts. Three of the main differences I have spotted after reading the play and watching the movie are: in the movie John Proctor and Abigail Williams kiss while in the play they do not, the play very briefly talks about the hanging of accused victims but in the movie is not as brief and shows the hangings, last, the scene where the children and Tituba are dancing in the forest is never seen in the forest; we learn it from dialogue.

The Crucible was a very clever film created by Arthur Miller which leads to other identical films to be created with The Crucible in mind. The film of the Crucible was not the best, but definitely explained the play a lot better. It went more in debt with several parts and even enhanced how the viewers see the characters emotions. For instance, in the play, it was only a flashback when the girls were dancing in the woods. In the film, the girls were shown running, dancing and much more detail that is critical to the viewers. Other little things were also changed in the film to make it more appealing to the audience. Such as when Tituba gets whipped by Reverend Parris while in the play she is only threatened to be whipped. The film also made

I went to go see the The Edythe Bates Old: Moores Opera Center’s Production of “The Crucible” at the Moores Opera House. The show was based on the play by Arthur Miller. I had no prior experience to Operas before this one. I didn’t really know what to expect except for it to be similar to a play where the actors sing their lines. “The Crucible” was projected on a screen on the stage when I first walked into the Opera House, along with music from the orchestra being played in the background.