preview

The Critique of Ibn Khaldun’s Muqaddimah Nathan Provost History of the Middle East

Better Essays

The Critique of Ibn Khaldun’s Muqaddimah

Nathan Provost

History of the Middle East 600-1914
Dr. Serdar Poyraz
April 5, 2014
The Muqaddimah is a thirteenth century historical and sociological work that was written by one of the greatest historians at the time, Ibn Khaldun. His work was used all the way up until the 19th century because no other work has given so much in-depth detail to the history and society of the Middle East in the Middle Ages and prior to that. Ibn Khaldun has read more first-hand references to what really did happen, and understands how the Caliphates fell within the Middle East. He is very critical of other historians, but this is what makes him so accurate at this point in time. He comes up with theories …show more content…

He also notes populations were highly exaggerated among certain historians. There were not nearly as many Israelites as people thought there were after three generations since Moses; this was actually in the Torah. Al-Masudi must have put wrong information on this as well. He also had distaste for historians who exaggerated any extravagance within their kingdom just to avoid being criticized by someone else. There are even some Islamic stories in which mention cities like Iram which was said to be built like paradise, but Allah would destroy it. These are fictional cities that cannot be real even though some historians mentioned them, because Ibn Khaldun would need a good reference (like the Qur’an) to believe this was true. Ibn Khaldun understood the importance of having references and the errors certain historians made constantly. He saw himself as a great historian because of his great use of references and being unbiased as crucial to understanding the science behind history. Ibn Khaldun believes that learning about history will teach us about the political nature of kingdoms, cultures, the tensions between nations, and sociology. He recognizes that all of these are important to a historian or histography. This is why Ibn Khaldun believes that he knows what will happen to certain dynasties if they do certain things that follow a certain pattern. History will justify what a dynasty does (Umayyad, Abbasid, or the four Caliphs), and he is religious about what he

Get Access