The Construction Of A Construction Project Delivery

In my opinion, this way would not be a good way to determine the benefits of BIM when compared to the other two researches because, in this case, the response level was observed as 70%, and the others were case studies, which means they have been already implemented in the field on the site of construction. Two projects were selected where one of it followed BIM techniques and the other didn’t right from the beginning of construction. And from the literature review it is observed that the projects followed Integrated Project Delivery method where the planning starts from the pre construction phase of the project, and this project delivery method is the efficient way of project delivery method since all the teams will be coordinated much before the pre construction phase of the project. The case study presented in the first paper was based on owner's perspective and had less visibility to the contractor or designer. Apart from this, some of the data available was historical, thus an ideal state would be proper tracking of metrics by the team while

This study elicits examination of project management methodologies, to be addressed by the Information Systems division of a large construction company and consultancy, heretofore referred to as Constructive, its figurative name. Constructive's chief information officer and other executive team members, all of whom work at corporate headquarters, requested that the Business Intelligence department of its Information Systems division streamline and interconnect client, contractor, vendor, and internal enterprise data through a software information management system (IMS). This request entails IMS accessibility by Constructive's corporate divisions: Construction, Operations Management, Design & Engineering, [Procurement, Logistics, & Purchasing], [Quality Assurance: Material Science, Structural Integrity], Business Development & Sales, Marketing, Finance, Human Resources, Legal, Environmental

Construction projects are always unique and risks raise from a number of the different sources. Construction projects are inherently complex and dynamic, and involving multiple feedback processes. A lot of participants – individuals and organizations are actively involved in the construction project, and they interests may be positively or negatively affected as a result of the project execution or project completion. Different participants with different experience and skills usually have different expectations and interests. This naturally creates problems and confusion for even the most experienced project managers and contractors.

Over the past few years, the construction industry has been changing dramatically. One of the most important stages in the construction management and business management is the planning phase. They share similar two main levels of planning which are the strategic and operational planning. However, business management planning to decide in advance what should be done, and how to do it, when you do and you are done. On the other hand, Construction management strategic planning is to deal with selection on a high level of overall objective of the project, including the scope, procurement methods, schedules and financing options but the planning of operations, including the

The concept of BIM integrates all the activities related to the design, construction and operation into the ICT model developed and implemented within a communication platform. From the point of view of the project management theory and construction practice, the area of interest is integrated risk based on BIM. Negative consequences such as delays and financial losses that are detrimental conducted by investors raise a question of whether and how implementation of principles of BIM in project management can improve management activities associated with risk in construction projects.

This document serves the purpose of critically analysing the differences that exist between managing construction projects and I.T Projects

I understand that this assignment contributes to the assessment of my competency on work lectured on this course and co-determines my qualification for the receipt of a degree. I accept the rules of assessment of the University of Pretoria and the consequences of transgressing them.

The future of our industry lies in how best we can integrate and communicate all our work with various stakeholders to manage a project efficiently. This has given rise to an area called construction informatics where a significant amount of research is being done. The area deals with a range of subjects from integration to interoperability and from knowledge mining to strategic management. This area came into existence from two fields. The first was the use of computers to design and carry out time and cost calculations. The other was for computers to categorize and store essential information. Currently, integration, interoperability, innovation along with strategic management of Information and Communication Technologies are the key areas of research of construction informatics (Isikdag 2009).

These goals may vary, but are usually associated with cost, schedule and quality metrics commonly used to measure project success. Over time, businesses are adopting the integrated project delivery and project partnering in place of traditional delivery methods. IPD works in a way such so that team members integrate with each other. IPD is an effective tool because it involves all team members who work collaboratively to ensure the success of the project. For this project delivery organization to succeed, members of the team must commit to a true partnership. IPD demands a higher level of trust and engagement of not only the conception and construction team members, but also from the client, owner, and end users. IPD also fosters collaboration such that schedules are not only planned, but also developed by all the members involved as well.

The Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) is a professional association dedicating in the development and seeking for the advancement of construction education. ASC is also dedicated in inspiring knowledge as well as guiding and promoting excellence in teaching, curricula research and service. As part of the strategy to inspire knowledge, ACS intends to organize a conference that would be held by April 2014. The conference is dedicated to facilitate and stimulate international cooperation as well as enhancing information exchange for the advance and development of construction education. The conference is also aimed to facilitate information sharing, international cooperation as well as shaping the management of built environment through research and education.

Construction professionals see productivity gains as a result of more precise design and trade co-ordination, automated conflict avoidance, easier design interpretation, greater accuracy and fewer change orders. BIM’s ability to detect and avoid conflicts prior to construction reduces unbudgeted construction changes by 40% and can save up to 10% of the entire value of a construction project when compared to a non-BIM project.

An appropriate project delivery method can enhance the probability of meeting project goals and objectives, significantly increasing its efficiency (Touran, et al. 2011) (Luu, Ng and Chen 2005) (Rwelamila and Meyer 1999). Gordon (Gordon 1994) states that the selection of more efficient contracting methods could reduce project cost by an average of 5%. In a survey by The Charted Institute of Building (CIOB), a whooping majority of 87% believe that proper selection of project delivery system is synonymous with a successful project (The Chartered Institute of Building 2010). While there is no standard solution for all projects and thus there is no single project delivery system best suited for all projects (Masterman 2003), for a particular

There are also research based on empirically point of view, a number of scholars have tried to test such claims by developing quantitative indices for different dimensions of project team integration and sustainable construction and by examining the statistical relation between them. For example, Mollaoglu-Korkmaz, Swarup, & James Whitcomb Riley (2013) examined the relation between project delivery methods, project team integration and LEED building scores in 12 case studies in the United States. They operationalized ‘integration’ by the ‘early collaboration of the project’s participants, the chemistry among participants and the timing and method of communication’ (Mollaoglu-Korkmaz, Swarup, & Riley, 2013). The research found the expected relation between project team integration and procurement method (with American Construction Management at Risk

Let us first take a look through to some other major business and technology trends we are facing today that will impact how we execute our construction projects. It is no secret that we are living in a highly competitive environment, thanks to the global financial crisis there are fewer available projects with more contractors vying for them. Owners and governments increasingly demand that you deliver their complex projects faster and at a lower cost. You need to provide more accurate cost estimates and material quantities to ensure that you stay on budget and because project timelines are shrinking you have to manage projects with as few time and cost intensive RF eyes and change orders as possible. In addition owners and governments are increasingly savvy and expect you to have new qualifications before awarding the work. The construction industry is realigning in a fundamental way that is construction firms like yours are driving integrated practices in more effective production cycles by taking more control of the supply chain.

Typically, in the construction industry many resources are drawn into a complex building project. Clients, financiers, government, architects, engineers, project managers, consultants and other stakeholders each play a part in producing the end product. However, their interests are varied and can be at cross-purposes. This typically results in a fractured and disjointed approach to building.