The Constitution should be revised, but it should not be completely discarded. The foundation of the Constitution just needs to be stronger and more stable and it should be revised, because times have changed and are still changing. The Constitution is becoming outdated more and more everyday and it doesn’t address today’s needs anymore. We need to have a better handle on gun control and the use of guns and add some restrictions to the use of guns. Guns should not be illegal, because people use them to protect themselves and for the safety of their families, but if you are using them to harm others, it’s not okay. In the Constitution, it states that African Americans are only ⅗ of a person and it is not like that anymore, because everyone is
This paper goes over why The Constitution of 1876 needs to be re-written. It is based on past events and times have changed. There are amendments that are still used to this day and those are no problem. It is the ones that Texas has no use for that need to be removed. It has many unnecessary laws making the constitution look disorganized and messy. Having laws that are not being enforced is not very professional. The Texas Constitution also limits the power of the governor. The Democratic party decided to limit the power to avoid what happened in the Constitution of 1869. Texas was governed by the Republicans until 1873. The Democrats regained power and undid the Constitution of 1869.
The Constitution addresses our basic civil, individual, God-given rights and liberties and our government both local and central, should and must protect those rights. However, our brilliant Founding Fathers created these laws in the early development of our Country realizing our laws needed to evolve as our Country evolved. They went as far as calling our Constitution a “living and breathing document” meaning the laws must change with the current times and state of our nation. So as guns and firearms evolved to become more dangerous and accurate, I believe even our most basic, fundamental laws should have followed suite and evolved. Not only do I reason that this law is grossly misinterpreted, but I also believe this law should have been amended or at least evolved for more clear language to account for the evolution of the
I bet you probably don’t have all of the Thirteen Amendments memorised, but did you know that Amendment three is outdated? In 1607, Britain came to America (historyworld.net). Britain was in charge, which was hard because you had to sail a very long time till you got to Britain, then you had to sail back to America. That is just one reason Americans went to war and took over. We also had a problem because during the war, we did not have an Amendment Three, so the Red Coats just sowed up and depanded to stay in a random house.
Since the Constitution is 230 years old, it should be adjusted to the times of the 21st century. The Constitution needs a revision, so many tragic events have happened repeatedly such as Muslim Ban, racism, and more. A document such as the Constitution should be updated every ten to twenty years. Starting off with congress, the diverse people in the world should be introduced in congress, like more African Americans, Asians, women, and people who are in the LGBTQ community and more because different views of what’s going on in the world can impact other people and they may change their opinion on things instead of having a typical strict Caucasian decide what’s right and wrong.
who say that that right can not be taken away from them as it is one
However, the truth is the constitution is impeding the USA’s ability to see a problem and fix it. The constitution has become an obstacle for passing gun control statutes, prohibiting state legislators from passing reasonable gun control laws to protect citizens. Efficacious gun control methods such as stop and frisk have been deemed “unconstitutional”, as well as any implication of gun control. 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has been one of the few to voice her opinion on the Second Amendment: “It’s a very difficult political issue. But we are smart enough, compassionate enough to balance legitimate Second Amendment rights concerns with preventive measures and control measures…”
In the article, “Framed Up What the Constitution gets wrong” written by Hendrik Hertzberg, Robert Dahl’s perspective on the United States Constitution, he is in favor of the “American system does a better job than the democratic alternatives, and quite a
We should change our constitution for the reason that the political process that we use today is inefficient and unequal. The framers of the constitution made the political process inefficient on the basis that they wanted the government to be powerful enough to protect them from another state but not so powerful that they could take their property. The constitution was set up to protect the minority being that the framers of the constitution were a part of the minority. A way in which the political process is inefficient is that the legislative branch is split up into two branches the House and the Senate. The framers of the constitution did this to give states power in the political process as a result of them being independent prior to
When the founding fathers crafted the Constitution I believe they intended it to be a starting point by which we would build a successful and sustaining society. The core values that were and are enshrined within the Constitution still exist. What has changed since its inception however, are the types of issues and challenges the nation has faced, both then and now. This is not the first time, Legislators or the Supreme Court has had to intervene on behalf of a specific portion of the population in order to ensure that those core values could be applied to all not just equally, but, equitably. It is not just the duty, but the responsibility of the elected officials to re-interpret a law that would in some way violate the rights citizens.
The current second amendment is written as follows “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed”, these words have been written as such for two-hundred-twenty-five years, it is overdue and update. An article on scholastic.com gives a brief list of changes made to the constitution and why the changes were made “You may have heard the U.S. Constitution called "a living document.” Though it may seem like a dry piece of paper to you, it really is designed to live
In my own opinion, and I believe many will agree the 2nd Amendment is definitely not outdated. If anything it is very in date, because that is a right everyone have the opportunity to do. I believe we do need the freedom to own firearms in this country, because so much is going on. You never know when you may have to protect yourself. Although, believe everyone should have the proper training to even carry a weapon, and to sign a waiver that states, " That they will only use it for their protection, or when they are in harms way." Not to just show off or play with, because firearms are very serious. The only thing people seem to have with this law is criminals being able to get a firearms. Well at the end of the day they are humans too, and
One of the main problems with the constitution is what some may argue that the role of the president was not very thought of and linked to the constitution, therefore jeopardizing the nation to a dysfunctional and dangerous presidency. Throughout the history of American government, there have been a couple presidencies which have managed to gain high power and disregard the wellbeing of the nation, behave inappropriately and even unconstitutional.
The Constitution should change with society. Like all societies, ours changes with time. Like it or not, things will be different in the future. Although we agree with things we are doing now, we may not in the future. Our constitution is ment to be part of a lasting government in the land of the free. If the USA really wishes to be held up to that title, its people must be able to agree, and if needed, change the Constitution.
here were many ways that the Constitution helped to change the weaknesses of the United States. It helps by making the laws easier to pass and more fair, along with different documents. The Articles of Confederation were obviously a flawed document if they needed to be changed into the Constitution, thus the Constitution is helping.
The Constitution is the cornerstone of America. It has lasted longer than any republican government on Earth. The constitution has lasted far longer than the framers of the constitution had expected. The constitution should not be changed because it is fundamentally sound and applicable to today’s society. That is not to say that there isn’t some changes warranted, but the changes to the constitution are allowed and the process to make these changes via amendment are spelled out within the constitution itself. Currently there are have been approximately 11,000 proposals within congress to amend the Constitution since 1789 of those thirty three have been passed. (Senate.gov)