In 2014, the Colorado state legislature passed House Bill 17-1002 - the Child Care Expenses Tax Credit. This bill was aimed at alleviating the exuberant costs of child care in the state by providing a small, flat-dollar tax credit to low-income, working families. Families must meet several qualifications to receive the credit in its current form: they must be making less than $60,000 per year, they must have at least one child receiving child care services from a licensed provider in the state of Colorado, they must file a federal tax return, and they must provide the proper documentation stipulated in their taxes. The credit offers these families a sum of $500 for one child receiving care or $1,000 for two or more children receiving care. This credit is available to low-income, working families separately from the more-sizable, federal child care tax credits already in place, meaning that families who meet eligibility requirements for both credits may receive both without penalty. There are some problems with the bill in its current form. The most notable issue comes from the fact that many families earn less than $25,000 per year, and do not file a federal tax return. These families are, thus, unable to receive the credit that they are eligible for, further increasing the burden they face in terms of the costs of childcare. There is also the fact that families with more than two children who currently receive child care, do not receive a proportionate amount of credit
First, these immigrant single mothers aren’t employable because of being illegal, and when they do have a job, it isn’t enough. For this reason, many mothers can’t meet their,or their child’s needs. If there was more government, for example, helping pay the rent, many mothers wouldn’t have to stress out about where to get the money to pay the rent every month. Yes, these people aren’t citizens to be able to receive all this help but the government should see the bad side of this situation, the government should see that these kids are being affected because they aren’t able to receive what they're supposed to receive because they are natural-born citizens. Many single mothers ask for help from the government but sometimes it isn’t enough for their everyday life .
Should the government provide day care centers for working parents? Parents who are working hard to provide there family a good meal and to pay the rent, the least the government can do for these people is to help out a parent by providing free child care centers for working parents right? Guess what, the republicans and the democrats from congress have been doing something about it. There have at least been 70 bills that have been introduced by both of them, but it seems like the house of representative keep turning down every single one of them. (Noble) Government should pass a law that provides free daycare centers because that would be one thing less that the working parents would have to worry about. Free daycare centers will help a
The effects of the 1996 welfare reform bill helped declined caseloads on the social and economic well-being of fragile families, single mothers, and children. Although, the welfare reform was documented for making several positive changes such as reducing poverty rates, lowering the out of-wedlock childbearing, and formulated a better family structure, it is undeniable that poverty remained high among single mothers and their children. The reality of the matter was that most welfare recipients experienced serious barriers to maintain a stable employment due to their lack of skills, not having anyone available to take care of their young children when they leave for work as well as not gaining long-time employment with decent pay to help foster the family. As a result, most poor women and children were faced with the instability of economic and social future as welfare eligibility exhausted their efforts of supporting their families.
Foster Care Independence Act of 1999 Before this bill was signed into law the Federal Government provided about $70 million per year to conduct programs for adolescents leaving foster care that are designed to help them establish independent living. Research and numerous reports from States conducting these programs indicate that adolescents leaving foster care do not fare well. As compared with other adolescents and young adults their age, they are more likely to quit school, to be unemployed, to be on welfare, to have mental health problems, to be parents outside marriage, to be arrested, to be homeless, and to be the victims of violence and other crimes (Cook, 1991). The need for special help for youths ages 18 to 21
An estimate in 2011 concluded that 1.9 million families were the target population of the TANF program. The need that is targeted includes assisting families with cash benefits to provide for children in their home. Families below the federal poverty line are provided minimal cash assistance, child care, education, and training. For the TANF policy and program to be successful there needs to be changes that focus the increasing support for working families through TANF, eliminate education barriers, address employment barriers, provide child poverty reduction bonus, restore immigrant eligibility, enhance the capacity of the welfare system infrastructure, and expand other programs supporting low-income families (National Association of Social Workers, 2014). These changes are need to remove the focus from the deficit of individuals and families living in poverty while creating a policy that will address the needs of the
One of the United States most effective tools is The Earned Income Tax Credit which encourages work and improvement of family poverty (Center for American Progress, 2016). In the year of 2014 Earned Income Tax Credit helped more than 6.2 million Americans in the fight against poverty (Center for American Progress, 2016). A disadvantage to the Earned Income Tax Credit, is experienced in workers whose income is relatively low without qualifying children (Center for American Progress, 2016). In these
Georgia experienced 17,148 children in the foster care system during the year of 2015 (Adopt US Kids , 2016). Children engaged in the foster care system are far more susceptible to a disruption in their biopsychosocial development. One of the leading indicators for older age youth successfully transitioning out of foster care is graduating high school. Foster youth success in school can be impacted by their foster care placement. This paper will explore the intended impact and actual impact of the qualifications for becoming a foster parent. Also, it is my intent to discuss how the Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act of 2011 can enhance the foster care service delivery model. Identifying the gaps in foster care licensing policy is a preventative step in reducing youth risk factors for education neglect resulting in high school dropout. Research has shown that youth in the foster care system at an alarming rate are transferring from foster care to the penal system. It is my intention to advocate for safe foster care placements that supports the education needs of the youth.
The Child Support Enforcement Amendment was amended to Aid to Families with Dependent Children law by requiring State welfare agencies to notify law enforcement officials when benefits were being furnished to a child who had been abandoned by one of the parents. Child support would be given to the parent who has custody of the child. The nonresident parent would be considered the non-custodial parent and would have to pay support for the child. The courts were notified of any parent receiving benefits for the child and themselves. AFDC was first established as support for children whose father had died. By 1970s, AFDC was aided due to parents being divorced or separated, or never married. This then created The Child Support Enforcement and
The Senate's healthcare bill focuses primarily on changes to Medicaid, but one of the striking proposals is the Senate tightening the requirements for tax credits toward premium costs in 2020. According to CNN Money, many middle-class Americans would not qualify for
One of the United States most effective tools is The Earned Income Tax Credit which encourages work and improvement of family (Center for American Progress, 2016). In the year of 2014 Earned Income Tax Credit helped more than 6.2 million Americans in the fight against poverty (Center for American Progress, 2016). A disadvantage to the Earned Income Tax Credit, is experienced in workers whose income is relatively low without qualifying children (Center for American Progress, 2016). In these instances
SCHIP stands for State’s Children Health Insurance Program introduced in January 24, 1997. The bill is part of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 which was signed by President William Clinton in August 5, 1997 and became a public law1. The bill allows the States to designate the fund given by the federal government to families that qualifies under certain conditions. However, in September 7, 1997 it received a disapproval bill originating from the House. And in 2007, during the 110th Congressional session, the House introduced the State’s Children Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2007, H.R. 3963. The bill is introduced by the House Representative John D. Dingell and was placed under House Calendar No. 141 with one general
The second account of a changing stance toward children’s rights was evolution alongside women’s rights. Before this time, women and children were seen as unimportant under the law, whereas a father was given almost total control over all matters regarding his wife and children. If a father was violent or neglectful, society simply turned their shoulder to it. In the latter half of the nineteenth century, laws pertaining to the family system began to change. A new law recognized the equal rights of fathers and mothers with the mother’s rights reigning over the fathers in regards to the children. Also, the legal system began viewing children as important to the future of society, therefore “appropriate objects of the court’s
I think this a great program but we need more supports and we need the government to help fix this crisis. One thing that I have notice is that I don’t not here much about the local/micro level of child poverty not sure why but I know it exist.
I know they are underage but they are also "young" mothers and will definitely need more help. I know that in Hispanic cultures if you get pregnant young some parents kick the daughter out. With no choice but to grow up and I just thinking leaving with an adult-supervise is not always a option for young girls. The other provision I didn't agree with is states will be allowed to deny cash payments to children born into families already receiving assistance. I think this is just putting a cap on the families and it isn't right. I read more into this and the reason for this is because policymakers think that this provision will change the reproductive behavior of welfare recipients. I think that preventing families from receiving basic necessities by reducing welfare benefits could lead to greater familial poverty. I also read that one study found that family caps increase the poverty rate of children by 13.1%. I do like that they are trying to make education and training programs as continuum of activities that result in work. I also agree that the Welfare Reform should support healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood but it should be the main
Many people believe that should the Federal Government place a cap on child support, that support will remain the same throughout the child’s life. In addition, CP’s would argue that the Federal Government should not be involved in such matters, when in fact it has already placed its hand in the pot by seizing federal tax refunds or the denial of a new or re-finance mortgage until the current arrearages are paid in full.