The Artist And The Work

Since the beginning of time, artists have labored extensively to find innovative ways to convey sentiment, passion, and feeling. Telling stories and trying to unlock the minds of people through different avenues of artistic labors. Art touches and affects people in unique ways; it can have special or unusual meaning on the person depending on how one views it. Artists’ rendering of their art is interpreted in numerous ways by others who view it unless it is explained by the artist on its meaning giving a clear example of what they are portraying. Two people looking at the same painting, sculpture, portrait, or photo may come to different views on the arts meaning even though they are looking

Most artists express themselves through their work: their choices of creative projects, their development of projects, and the individual inner artist as an underlying basis for their work. All artists create with pure devotion to esthetically pleasing an audience, a client, a customer or ultimately aesthetic pleasure for a viewer or listener.

Piper argues that the disconnection of the artist with the artwork lessens the strength and potential impact on the meaning of the piece to the viewers. She would rather have the artist be present with the work. Since a lot of artworks are the end product itself, the process of creating the is only “inferred by the viewer” she further explains that the work.. is the final part of the process, rather than the embodiment of the process”. Piper argues that the presence of the artist and to her the different aspects of the process can influence the interpretation of the work by the viewer. She further argues that the presence of an artist strengthens the art works potential impact on the viewer because there is a “direct and immediate confrontation”

As artistic movements sweep certain time periods, location is an important factor in the development of an artist’s vision. While Europe is a compact continent, it’s artistic productions can be largely influenced by the country of origin. This can be seen in multiple artistic movements such as the Renaissance where works from Italy and England while largely influenced by the same artistic goals produce works with stylistic differences. Baroque style art was also subject to these geographical differences influencing the vision of the artist. Understanding the complex layers of an artistic movement requires one to analysis works of art and how they compare to other pieces produced during the same time. By taking two works with the same subject matter, one can effectively dissect the influences that time and place have had on the artist’s execution. In 1530 Germany, Lucas Cranach the Elder produced a painting titled Judith with the Head of Holofernes depicting the biblical heroine Judith with the severed head of Holofernes. A little more than a hundred years later in 1640 Italy, Massimo Stanzione created a similar representation of this story in his work, Judith with the Head of Holofernes. Both artist took the same biblical story but produced two individual works invoking different effects one through Baroque style and the other a Renaissance interpuation.

He goes on to say that though there is bad art in every generation it is a necessity; so that we can truly and fully enjoy art that has survived years, cultures, and even their own civilizations. “…having no joy, for they knew no misery; doing no good, for they knew no sin.” (2Ne. 2:23) Those have not tasted the sourness of sorrow cannot fully appreciate the sweetness and liberation happiness can bring because they have nothing to compare it to so the result is

-The Greeks had very different views of the artist. On one side, they viewed the artist as a demigod, and by doing this, they neglected to criticize any of the artist's work. On the other side the artist was viewed as an impostor, whose art was worth nothing. Both of these ideas are detrimental in many ways, and both are missing the core of an artist. The foundation of an artist lies in Christ, and the Greeks missed out on that.

     Art, in each and every form that it comes in, shows us who we are. Our

There has been a tense relationship between the church and the arts in the past, but a new Renaissance appears to be ongoing. Witness the genuine flood Of books on Christianity and the arts in the past hundred years. And this buzz about the arts is already filtering into many churches. Thus I think I can take for granted a certain level of comfort among readers with the arts as a noble Christian search. However, I would like to argue that not only is it approved by God, but art plays a vital role for humanity; we need it in the church and in the world; more of us ought to develop our artistic gifts and our ability to thoughtfully interact with art from a Christian viewpoint; and we need to support the artists in our midst, both

Art is an expression of an individual’s will to society at large, one whose origin is very much of a personal nature. So only the artist knows the source of his own work. This loftiness is what makes art so cool. Of course, there are plenty of ways to interpret the expressions that artist give birth to. Non-artist commune with art by coming up with interesting interpretations of art, appreciating it, commenting on it, re-editing art as in an exhibition, or using art as intellectual resource, on the other hand, is basically non

For over two thousand years, various philosophers have questioned the influence of art in our society. They have used abstract reasoning, human emotions, and logic to go beyond this world in the search for answers about arts' existence. For philosophers, art was not viewed for its own beauty, but rather for the question of how art and artists can help make our society more stable for the next generation. Plato, a Greek philosopher who lived during 420-348 B.C. in Athens, and Aristotle, Plato’s student who argued against his beliefs, have no exceptions to the steps they had to take in order to understand the purpose of art and artists. Though these two philosophers made marvelous discoveries about the existence of art, artists, and

I think that the end result is truthfulness. Every artist must be sincere and truthful if he wants to be a great and true artist over and over again art is predictable to request and bond with human being feelings. Art can awaken aesthetic or ethical feelings. The amount of skillfulness that the artist has will influence over the capability they have so they can to generate an emotional response and by this means make available new insights. Art tends to smooth the progress of spontaneous slightly than coherent thoughtfulness, and frequently it is knowingly shaped with this purpose. Art calculatedly serves no other function. As a result of this forward motion, works of art are hard to pin down, refractive to attempts at arrangement, for the reason that they can be respected in more than one way, and are often vulnerable to many dissimilar interpretations. Even art that to every appearance depicts a commonplace proceedings or items may encourage manifestation upon prominent themes. Conventionally, the uppermost achievements of art make obvious a high intensity of ability or fluency within a medium. This characteristic might be considered a point of contention, since many contemporary artists (particularly, theoretical artists) do not themselves produce the moving parts they envisage, or do not even produce the labor in a straight, affectionate wisdom. Art has a capacity of transforming: predominantly confers

Nobody comprehends your struggles, hard work, sacrifices and hours you put in, before and after you rise to prominence, they only see the finished product. This quote illustrates the difficulties of an artist “Talent is what they say after the novel is published and favorably reviewed. Beforehand what you have is a tedious delusion” (Piercy). This verse depicts that a novelist is not fully appreciated as an artist until they achieve success and are seen as having a misapprehension of their talents. In addition, another quote that reveals the struggle of an artist is “Work is what you have done after the play is produced and the audience claps. Before that friends keep asking you when you are planning to go out and get a job” (Piercy). ). This

The history of art dates back to ancient times. Artwork can be, and was, found around the world. What makes art interesting is that it can be created in any way, shape or form with any materials. It seems that the artwork can also tell us a lot about the artist. Art seems to be simply, a direct, visual reflection of the artist’s life. Therefore, one can assume that an artist’s life experiences and beliefs directly influence their art. If we look at examples from different periods of art we will be able to see the connection between the artist and the art.

As art becomes more prevalent, intricate, and sophisticated in culture so does its impact on a viewer. A viewer must experience a work of art and connect to it in order for it to be considered effective. Aristotle, one of the most renowned Greek philosophers, believes in this idea and that is why Ajax by Sophocles can be considered a work of art. Sophocles’ play follows a warrior named Ajax who was threatening to kill Odysseus to obtain the armor he believed was rightfully his, which causes the goddess Athena to cast a curse leaving him blind with rage and in a state where he slaughters hordes of animals believing that they are his enemies. Ajax later becomes distraught to the point of suicide. Bryan Doerries produced a version of Ajax to relate to veterans through his company, Theater of War. This company’s specific purpose is to "de-stigmatize psychological injury, increase awareness of post deployment psychological health issues, disseminate information regarding available resources, and foster greater family community, and troop resilience" through the performance of Ancient Greek plays to military and civilian communities (Outside the Wire). Because of this purpose, the audience is able to form an intense connection with Ajax and fulfill the purpose of art. While looking at Aristotle’s Theory of Tragedy and the six most important features of a tragedy, it becomes apparent that connection in all six features is the only way to create effective art. Bryan Doerries’

When an artist goes to paint a piece, or mold a sculpture there is no preset impression of how the artist interprets it to turn out. They let their creative energy generate the image as it evolves ascetically with the agency of creating art. The artist may not have a vivid account, or clear picture for the final result but the art emerges as the artist conducts his piece leaving the artist with pure, utter creative freedom.When hearing this metaphor its hard not to see the direct correlation to moral choice being relatable to the construction and formulation of art work. “I mention the work of art only by way of comparison.That being understood, does anyone reproach an artist, when he paints a picture, for not following rules established?