The Analyst recommends maintaining the Project’s 4- rating. The assigned rating reflects cash flow stability and visibility from a long-term PPA with an investment grade off-taker, expectations that the Term Loan will fully amortize by the maturity date, and a slightly weak operating profile given higher than the normal equipment failure rate.
Keenan is comparable to Grand Renewable Wind LP (“GRW”) (4-) and Gosfield Wind Financial Corporation (“Gosfield”) (4-). Like Keenan, GRW and Gosfield’s cash flows come from the long-dated PPAs with the investment grade off-takers.
GRW’s risk profile reflects slightly worse assessment of one of the financial ratio (average DSCR) related risk factor. Gosfield’s risk profile reflects environmental risk, less than adequate PPA/Operating life Tail, and a very low equity in the capital structure. Keenan’s operating risk profile is weaker than the operating profile of the other two projects while its financial risk profile is slightly stronger than the financial risk profile of Gosfield and much stronger than the GRW’s financial risk profile.
The Analyst notes that a Wind Project within the SFS EF AM’s portfolio that has a PPA with a strong investment- grade counterparty, no price or volume risk with the PPA tail extending beyond the term of the loan, and “Neutral/Standard” assessment of all other risk factors is rated 4+. The Project’s rating reflects a notch downgrade (4-) due to the operational issues with the equipment. The operating
As Pleasure Craft Inc. has publicly held debt; we determined the cost of debt to be the yield to maturity on the outstanding debt on the outboard motor project, so using a financial calculator we establish the YTM to be equal to 2.4827%. Because this is a Semi- annual compounding, rd = YTM * 2 = 4.9654%; for the cost of equity (Rf + β (Rm - Rf)): 12.8420%. The WACC is the discount rate of the projects WACC = rd * (1- Td) * D/V + (re * E/ V) = 4.9654% (1- 35%) * 30% + 12.8420% * 70% = 0.0996, so the WACC is determined to be 9.96% for outboard motors project. The NPV of this project is positive and equal to $35,630,973.63, the IRR for the outboard motors has calculated to be 8%. From these calculation we can know the project’s beta is lower than project front- end loader project and the risk is lower also; from the decision rule the NPV > 0 and IRR > R, so we choose the outboard motor project.
* Place paper towel over clear glass bowl with rubber band holding it in place.
We should accept the project because of the positive NPV and high IRR. We will gain $532 million in wealth which is a big money on the scale like this. The company has a bond rating of AA that makes the risk relatively low. So we should definitely say yes.
In February 2014, SFS EF AM committed to the Borrower’s $133.0 million Senior Secured Term Loan (the “Term Loan”). The Term Loan will fully amortize over by December 2028 under the P50 exceedance based energy output. At the end of August 2016, SFS F AM’s share of the Term Loan was $27.3 million. The Analyst notes that the Term Loan will fully amortize six months before the expiry of the 20-year wind energy purchase agreement (“WEPA”) with the Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. (“OGE”) (A-/A1/A; SFS Equivalent Rating 3).
7) See Table 1 NPV=42,318.71 IRR = 14% MIRR = 12% Payback period= 2.93 years. Yes the project should be undertaken.
Intermountain has also benefitted from an AA+ bond rating which reduces their borrowing costs. It is critical that the organisation maintains a healthy financial performance so as to retain the rating. A lower rating would add to their financial pressure.
This is to ensure that the necessary raw materials and physical resources are available at each stage, and that the workforce on site has the right skills for the scheduled work. The project management team will need to produce a series of planning documents that can be accessed throughout the project. Each member of the project management team must know their role and responsibilities, including which sections of the workforce they will be directly managing.
This project charter is planned to help O’Donnell & O’Donnell LLP who will lead the project management team take place the parade smoothly. This parade for welcoming home troops will be organized in Colorado Spring which has a long history of military. This project charter’s goal is making sure project management team and sponsors understand all details and tasks of this parade and getting an agreement between these two parties. Some important tasks can be directed with the project charter. For examples, raising fund, arranging thousands of soldiers and planning a lunch
staff, management, and goals are in place to include them in the grid. Future plans must
The present value of the net incremental cash flows, totaling $5,740K, is added to the present value of the Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) tax shield, provided by the Plant and Equipment of $599K, to arrive at the project’s NPV of $6,339K. (Please refer to Exhibit 4 and 5 for assumptions and detailed NPV calculations.) This high positive NPV means that the project will add a significant amount of value to FMI. In addition, using the incremental cash flows (excluding CCA) generated by the NPV calculation, we calculated the project’s IRR to be 28%. This means that the project will generate a higher rate of return than the company’s cost of capital of 10.05%. This is also a positive indication that the company should undertake the project.
1) Describe Plenitude's position in the US market in the early 1996. Why has it apparently been less successful in the US than in France when the French "success" formula was used in the US?
The first of these concerns would be the financial situation of Aurora Textiles as a whole. We have historically been a very strong company who has been seen as one of the premier companies in the textile industry. As of late we have posted less than stellar numbers though. In each of the last four years, we have posted negative net earnings. This is troubling and if this continues it could lead to us having to liquidate the company. With the current cash burn rate that we are on, our company will be bankrupt in 7.86 years. When evaluating the Zinser project we will look at this as the tentative cutoff date for when we can realize the cash flows for this project. Although we have been struggling financially and have an approaching timeline for turning the company around, we find that this only gives us more of an urgency to invest in the Zinser. First of all, when looking at the discounted payback period for the project, we have discounted back the cash flows for the project and found that the current payback period is 4.07 years. This is encouraging as it is well before the 7.86 year deadline we are on. Having a relatively small payback period is important to us because of the struggles we have had lately. Since this project fits our time horizon, we can look at what this project will do for our
This project is reasonable and worth to take it. It will add more value to the company since its NPV is positive and has an attractive IRR and MIRR (higher than WACC). Moreover, the breakeven occurs in year two, in the middle of the project lifecycle, which is a good sign as well.
The proposal seems to be an attractive one due to the fact that there seems to be a need in the district for this particular district to have the ability to perform some preproduction processing which is beneficial to local customers. The investment seems to be within company parameters and sounds attractive.
Wind Technologies has to re-design its operations and product focus to one that focuses on its HVPS; finding the proper target market and marketing to real potential customers.