Temporary Cash Assistance Program Research Paper

The information from our meeting was provided to our leadership team via email. This was the responsibility of the team, along with the minutes (chart minutes 1F) from the meeting. See email 1E.

H.R.1469 - Welfare Benefit Reform and Alignment Commission (BRAC) Act is a Bill that was presented to Congress 03/09/2017. This bill intends to develop a testing program in which those who are receiving assistance can improve their quality of life and be basically self-sufficient and get off the welfare rolls. The welfare system is and has been in great need of reform and reorganization.

The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act also shifted the spotlight of welfare from family maintenance through government-supported financial assistance to family economic self-sufficiency through paid employment. This federal welfare reform policy known as TANF encourages employment and personal responsibility by mandating states to provide financial benefits to families on a temporary basis, having recipients participate in a work requirement while receiving aid, and providing incentives for recipients to transition off welfare. The programs name indicated its purpose and the social message to the recipient.

The main goal of Welfare Reform is to reduce dependency. Since Welfare Reform, TANF caseloads have dropped by nearly 50 percent. Some tend to argue that this decline was in part due to a stronger economy, but in the past 50 years no previous economic growth ever results in the decline of the case load. The decrease in caseload is not

One negative aspect of this act is that it gives amnesty to those that are law breakers (“Are DACA and the DREAM Act 1”). In other words, criminals should not be given a chance to be part of the program, DACA. For instance, according to Lamar Smith, “the Dream Act proposals are a magnet for fraud. Many illegal immigrants will falsely claim that they came here as children or that they are under 30, and the federal government has no way to check whether their claims are true.” The point here is that illegal immigrants could lie about their age and at what time they first arrived in the U.S. In addition, “the Dream Act rewards the illegal immigrant parents who knowingly violated our laws. Once their children become U.S. citizens, they can petition for their illegal immigrant parents and adult siblings to be legalized. Those adults will then bring in others in an endless chain, which only encourages more illegal immigration” (Smith). Essentially, parents who brought their children to our country were breaking the law in the first place and it now allows others to petition to do the same. Statistics also show that since 2012, 15,000 Dreamers have lost their DACA status because of gang involvement or other criminal activity. However, Dreamers are only disqualified if they are convicted of a crime, which according to Ronald W.

The background of social welfare has impacted the policies for today’s social welfare and TANF policy. There are several policies

Before Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) became what it is known as today, it was called Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). AFDC was a grant program created to allow states to fund cash welfare payments for needy children who struggle with parental support because of a father or mother’s absence, unemployment, incapacity, or death. It was established by the Social Security Act of 1935. When President Clinton signed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in 1996, it replaced AFDC and its administration, the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills Training (JOBS) program, and the Emergency Assistance (EA) program with TANF, a cash welfare block grant. The belief for this transition was that Americans should become

They hope that the recipients will work towards someday leaving the program. While this is the goal, many recipients will not attempt to find work or the job is consider too low paying for them. Therefore, they continue to be a welfare recipient or are forced out of the program. There have been many changes in the welfare system and how to deal with the poor and less fortune. If you are having a difficult time paying your medical bills, housing and most important food for yourself and your family, you are definitely not alone even in 2014. Temporary assistance for needy families TANF replaced the traditional welfare programs known as Aid to Families with Dependent Children ( AFDC) . The welfare system would be an unlikely model for anyone designing a welfare system 1996. The type and amount of aid available to individuals and dependent children varies from state to state. Failure to comply with work requirements could result in loss of benefits . Current

It is argued that since the implementation of the (PWA) the number of welfare participants who receive welfare benefits has been decreasing at record rates. As reported in What Has Welfare Reform Accomplished? Impacts On Welfare Participation, Employment, Income, Poverty, and Family Structure by Robert Schoeni, “After peaking in 1994, welfare caseloads had dropped 50 percent by June 1999; at that time, just 6.9 million 4 people representing 2.5 percent of the population were receiving welfare. Not since 1967 has such a small share of the population relied on welfare” (Schoeni, et.al, 2000, p. 3). In addition, his data shows a decline “Between January 1997 and December 1999, 1.8 million families left the welfare rolls, almost double the number that moved out of welfare in the three previous years (Schoeni, et.al, 2000, p. 4). Other research shows similar data, for instance, “In 1994, 5.5 percent of the U.S. population was dependent on welfare; 5 years, and a series of state and federal welfare reforms later, the proportion had shrunk to 2.3 percent” (Kaushal, et.al, 2001, p.2). The decline in welfare rolls have been attributed to two things, first, the increment of jobs in the labor

Dreamers could now obtain a Drivers License, a work permit, and enroll in any college. Though, most importantly it offered a temporary legal status to those who would attend college or join the military. This to the dreamers meant no more hiding in the shadows. They would be given the chance to demonstrate their worth without having to worry about deportation. Things from here on would only get better. Right ?

There are a lot of pros and cons to this reform and a lot of aspects of the act are being misinterpreted or misunderstood. Although this reform was designed with the best intents, certain aspects of it seem to be questionable. One of the aspects that raises the most disputes among the political leaders is the funding issue associated with the implementation of this act. In order to finance the new program

While there are many benefits to passing this law, we must consider the other possible problems and solutions as well. Selling food stamps for drugs is not the sole issue at hand. Welfare abuse comes in many forms. Until recent changes in identification verification practices by physicians and medical centers, Medicaid fraud was also an ongoing issue. People without medical coverage would often borrow the medical card of a friend or family member, and then go to a doctor or dentist.

The details of this program affect not only the people being supported by welfare, but the nation as a whole. The forty-seven percent of Americans (www.usgovernmentspending.com)

I know they are underage but they are also "young" mothers and will definitely need more help. I know that in Hispanic cultures if you get pregnant young some parents kick the daughter out. With no choice but to grow up and I just thinking leaving with an adult-supervise is not always a option for young girls. The other provision I didn't agree with is states will be allowed to deny cash payments to children born into families already receiving assistance. I think this is just putting a cap on the families and it isn't right. I read more into this and the reason for this is because policymakers think that this provision will change the reproductive behavior of welfare recipients. I think that preventing families from receiving basic necessities by reducing welfare benefits could lead to greater familial poverty. I also read that one study found that family caps increase the poverty rate of children by 13.1%. I do like that they are trying to make education and training programs as continuum of activities that result in work. I also agree that the Welfare Reform should support healthy marriages and responsible fatherhood but it should be the main

"The U.S. Congress kicked off welfare reform nationwide last October with the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, heralding a new era in which welfare recipients are required to look for work as a condition of benefits." http://www.detnews.com/1997/newsx/welfare/rules/rules.htm. Originally, the welfare system was created to help poor men, women, and children who are in need of financial and medical assistance. Over the years, welfare has become a way of life for its recipients and has created a culture of dependency. Currently, the government is in the process of reforming the welfare system. The welfare reform system’s objective was to get people off the welfare system and onto the