preview

Teapot Dome Case

Decent Essays

In the 1920s, Teapot Dome was synonymous with government corruption and scandals arising out of President Warren G. Harding. Since then, it has often been used to symbolize the power and influence of oil companies in American politics. Before the events of Watergate scandal, one historian called it, “The greatest and most sensational scandal in the history of American politics.” Teapot Dome is a geological feature in Wyoming. It is named for a nearby Teapot Rock and the site of an oil field. In 1915, President Woodrow Wilson, designated that oil deposit as Naval Oil Reserve Number 3(reserves Number 1 and Number 2, in Elk Hills and Buena Vista Hills, California, had been similarly identified by President William Howard Taft in 1912). These …show more content…

Albert B. Fall and Harry F. Sinclair. On June 30, 1924, a criminal indictment was filed in the District of Columbia charging Albert B. Fall and Harry F. Sinclair with conspiracy to defraud the Unites States of America. The trial began on October 17, 1927, but ended prematurely two weeks later when the government presented evidence that Sinclair had hired a detective agency to shadow the jury. The Judge declared a mistrial and Sinclair was tried for Criminal contempt of court. More than one hundred witnesses were called for the trial. The judge found Sinclair and his associates guilty. Sinclair was sentenced to jail for six months. …show more content…

Harry F. Sinclair. Albert B. Fall had deteriorating health problems. The special counsel chose to pursue the conspiracy to defraud charge against Sinclair alone. In April 1928, the trial got underway to defraud Sinclair in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. Much of the testimony was the same as what was heard in the civil trial involving Sinclair and Fall, where Sinclair had refused to testify on grounds of self-discrimination. There was an exception this time though. The testimony of M. T. Everhart, who for the first time gave details of how he had carried a package of bonds from Sinclair to Fall. Senator Alva Adams, a Colorado Democrat suggested this, by hearing M. T. Everhart’s testimony. “I am not able to give you accurate information as to the motives which led Mr. Everhart to persist in refusing to testify, but am disposed to think from what I have heard that he has been impressed with the idea that having taken the position which he did in Cheyenne that it was his duty as a matter of loyalty and consistency to persist in the same course. His family and close associates feel greatly outraged that Secretary Fall should put Mr. Everhart in this position and apparently insist on him continuing in a course so damaging to him. Mr. Everhart reported on his return that he received the utmost consideration and courtesy from you and Mr. Roberts but that his treatment from those whom he was befriending

Get Access