Tannen Case Summary

At 14:32 Haring was arrested for OWI and fleeing the scene of an accident. He was taken away for booking and a Data Master Breathalyzer test.

On 04/13/2017 Tashia Couts was sent home on suspension due to threats made via Social Media to Amaiya Weston in which case she stated that she felt unsafe and did not even want to take a luch or walk to her car. John Hammann walked Amaiya to her car and watched as she left safely. Amaiya also felt unsafe due to a comment Shacora Wiggins made as she was escorted out on a suspension as well by John Hammann.

CCIB LPA C Perryman-French received a call from Raylette (Letty). Her son Jason Laidley Jr. (DOB 03/10/89) lives at this location. Raylette did not know this was an ARF and when the facility was called (three way call with LPA), the facility staff could not or would not provide the facility license #. Lanterman Regional Center Staff provided LPA with the actual name and facility number. Jason wears a cochlear implant, his room mate recently broke it, now Jason has to write down any communication he has with anyone. Knowing this, staff sent him to the store on Sunday afternoon (07/26/15) to buy toilet paper and light bulbs for the facility. (Raylette noted that Jason's IPP also states he is not to leave the facility unsupervised.) Jason apparently

This article is based on the shooting death of Reza Payan by a longtime friend Ronald Melnik. On January 1, 2011 Reza Payan invited his friend Ronald Melnik out to a New Year’s Eve party. At this party Melnik became intoxicated and at the end of the night when Payan offered him a ride home the two got into an altercation with each other which ended with Melnik shooting Payan, resulting in the death of Payan (Olmeda, 2017). The article is talking about Melnik trying to get his second-degree murder case dismissed because of the evidence of a blood sample being destroyed while he was trying to find someone to test the blood to get his own results. This analysis primary focus is on the prosecution and pretrial phase of a case.

The senior director of Ottawa Valley Food Products, R.J. Jennings, is having issues with his replacement administrative assistant. His former assistant was very outgoing and willing to work long hours in order to please her boss and to get the work done in a timely manner. When she took an early retirement, the company hired a replacement assistant for Mr. Jennings. Over her time with the company the new assistant, Mary Gregory, was at times incapable of the workload she had been given, which her predecessor had no trouble with. Not only was Mary incompetent at times, she also seemed to have no sense of proper business etiquette.

Neser aptly observes that the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of the HCGPP is discounted by the fact Griffin articulated his statements regarding the section’s intent after this question into the nuances of this provision arose. Indeed, the persuasive value of Griffin’s testimony is discounted to the extent that it might constitute an ad hoc iteration of the agency’s subsequently articulated intent. Griffin’s testimony regarding the intent of this provision is nevertheless consistent with the subsequent amendment made to adopt the Board’s interpretation of the statute. “While amendments are not controlling as to the meaning of prior iteration of the same statutory scheme, ‘nevertheless, subsequent legislation

When a person takes steps toward the commission of a crime and has a specific intent to commit the crime, but for unforeseen reasons is unable to complete the crime the person has committed the crime of Attempt (Jirard, 2009). In the case of the State of Indiana versus Donald J. Haines, emergency personnel including two police officers [Dennis and Hayworth] along with emergency medical technicians [Garvey and Robinson] responded to Mr. Haines’s apartment for a report of a possible suicide that just occurred. When officers Dennis and Hayworth arrived at Haines’s apartment they discovered him lying face down in a pool of blood. Officer Dennis noticed that both of Haines’s wrists were cut and were bleeding. When Haines heard the paramedics he stood up, and began screaming at Dennis that he has AIDS and that he should be left to die. Dennis advised Haines that he was there to help him, and Haines told Dennis that he wanted to fuck him so that he could give him AIDS. Haines than told Dennis that he was going to utilize his wounds to spray blood on him, and began to jerk back and forth causing his infected blood to get into Dennis’ mouth and eyes. Haines told Dennis that he could not deal with having AIDS, but that he was going to make him deal with it.

Rhyannon (mother) went to the ER in West Point on the night of 10-26-15. She had a chemical burn in which she stated she was snaking the toilet to get it unclogged, and Dusty had poured Ammonia in the toilet. She mentioned to the reporter that Dusty has a meth lab in the shed. It was unknown how long he had the lab, but Rhyannon would not go to the police per the reporter's request, in fear her child would be taken. Rhyannon and Dusty are separated, but he had been living in the home. Rhyannon put him out the night of 10-25-15, due to the chemical burn, him having a female around, and a lot of other people at the house. It was unknown if the mother was using meth on that night, but she was on something, and was drug tested at the hospital.

1. Ms. Fimney (MHS) describe Selenna as argumentative and manipulating, however can be a sweet child. Selenna has displayed defiance, disrespect, verbal aggression towards peers in the community and adults in the home.

Buahn, is well known in her community in Austin.. She is an active member of her community and works hard to make sure Sudanese and other African parents are involved in the community especially when it comes to their children’s education. She first found out about Three Rivers housing service through a local festival in Austin and came to homeownership education workshop that was offered by TRCA. After the workshop Buyan spoke to the TRCA housing counselor and expressed her desire to become a homeowner. She said she has been denied several times by the bank for a mortgage due to credit.

Candidate Janssen was missing multiple vital parts of his operations order, to including a complete mission statement, EPW Plan, and a complete command paragraph. Candidate Janssen took input from his peers in order to improve his plan. SNM lead by example and placed himself at the point of friction. When a board entered the water, Candidate Janssen took himself out of the fight for 60 seconds to retrieve the board. He should have used another member of his team, as it caused the fire team to wait for his return rather than continuing to solve the problem. During points of friction Candidate Janssen remained calm and collective which built confidence in his fire team. Candidate Janssen did an outstanding job checking on security, while

In regard to the “dear colleague” guidelines, the VP, in light of the letter from the resident assistant, should take immediate actions to prevent further harassment. Whether the institution should have reasonably known that student harassment was occurring is questionable.

After a thorough evaluation of various options available to Nucleon Inc. to bring their product to market, we recommend that Nucleon Inc. pursues the option of In-house Pilot Plant for Phase I and Licensing for Phase III.

SFC Tedtaotao quickly took on his position and completely cleaned up the section; possessing the highest level of management style and procedures, this was proven by being the first and only Motor Pool throughout CACOM to excess their equipment usage standards. His work ethic allowed him to create and update Battalion's Motor Pool SOPs that will be utilized far past his time with the Unit, made known by receiving "Commendable Status" during Brigade inspections.

Today, employees can be considered as the greatest strength of the company. They are the ones who help build the reputation of the company, it is their job to ensure the success of the business, which is why it is very important to keep them satisfied. A recent statistic shows that an American worker has an average of eight jobs in his career (Rudman, 2003). This stat shows how difficult it is to retain a core strength of a company. In this essay, an analysis of a case study is made. The case includes at first, a discussion between Chip Brownlee and Arch carter, the CEO and lead director of Galvatrens respectively. During this conversation, they discussed a lawsuit that a former employee sent to the company for being wrongfully relieved of his duty. Also in the case study after investigation the board of Galvatrens and their CEO made a meeting in order to tackle the problems and know what really happened. In this essay, it will explain the main ethical dilemmas in the case study, and according to these dilemmas a comparison will be made between utilitarian, libertarian, deontological and virtue ethics perspectives. Finally, as a form of an ethical point of view will be used to be the best solution to solve the dilemma of the recommendation.