Reflecting upon your inquiries on the first paragraph, the male dominated perspective does not seem to serve men either. You mentioned sexual assault and violence in your post. Associating victims with female gender as well as perceiving female victims as weak does not seems to help understanding how to support male victims of assault and/or violence.
Furthermore, your last paragraph (para. 3) is, I believe, a significant contribution of the feminist theory. Systematic oppression of female (and other minorities’) voice in history has influenced people’s experiences and responses. The feminist perspective normalizes minority groups’ experiences. At the same time as Muzak (2009) pointed out, it is important that we do not get stuck in the victim’s
Male victims are often unrecognized by the media, because they do not fit the stereotype that is set. Again, it’s been drilled into our heads that men are the perpetrators and women are the victims. Men are supposed to be strong, while women are weak, making them the easier target. How could a male be a victim of abuse? According to the media, there is no way men can be victims alongside women.
Men are also viewed as the dominant gender, so they are viewed as powerful people. Being in the dominant group allow people to have privileges and get away with rebelling against the rules. For instance, men are viewed as the leaders and dominant figures that do not have to respect others or their feelings. Viewing men as people that are untouchable rebels is causing violence against women to continue. Furthermore, violence is a men’s issue, because men are usually viewed as initiators.
Women have been downgraded and mistreated because of their gender. From birth, Women and Men grew up with very different rules to follow. Men were raised to be the head of the house and do work for a living. Growing up as little girls, women were taught to raise their kids and make food for their families. “Strong family structures were necessary because the family was the basis for all other institutions. The government, church, and community all worked through the nuclear family unit.”(“Gender and
The women of Saudi Arabia have been oppressed by the men of the country for generations due to the ignorance of the people, their Islamic faith, and the government. They have no rights and they must receive permission from their husbands or fathers to work, travel, and receive medical attention. The memoir Princess: A True Story of Life Behind the Veil in Saudi Arabia by Jean Sasson, is an excellent example of the oppression of women in Saudi Arabia and the literary devices of characterization and setting help to bring the oppression to life.
Gender violence is a men's issue. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics Crime Data Brief (2003), men are accountable for “15 percent of the victims of reported intimate partner violence.” (Men as Victims of Domestic Violence) This is an occurring problem that doesn’t seem to have a solution. The reason why this doesn’t have a solution is that we don’t take the problem seriously and look deeper into this, misogyny. This issue sadly affects everyone all around us, including men.
Women across cultures face similar forms of oppression in varying ways. The stories of Maxine Hong Kingston, Nicholas D. Kristof, Sheryl WuDunn, Banana Yoshimoto, and Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie bring awareness to these heartbreaking yet inspiring narratives of the lives of women outside of North America. While some of the works are fictional, there is still an air of realism that accentuates the general ideas conveyed in the individual narratives. Themes such as tradition, assimilation, racism, classism, education, and point of view in story-telling are present throughout these books. This allows readers to understand different systems of oppression on a global scale and can possibly inspire a form of altruism that can lead to philanthropic
In contrast to the women who assembled at the Seneca Falls convention in 1948 and merely protested against the ill-treatment and abuse of women by drunken husbands and achievement of their legitimate rights in marriage, control of property and earnings and equal pay with men for the same work, the demands of the modern successors are far more radical. In the largest most enthusiastic Feminist demonstration ever held, on August 26, 1970, hundreds of women marched down Fifth Avenue, New York City carrying play cards which read:
Are women less privileged in today’s society than men? Yes, women face many issues on a regular basis that men don’t experience to the same extent. Women are victim to sexual violence, domestic abuse, and gender bias. Firstly, a very common violation to the human rights of women, is sexual violence and harassment. This is a very extensive topic, covering much more than just sexual assault. Sexual violence covers street harassment, unwanted sexual touching or comments, rape, and consent issues. Secondly, women face domestic abuse very often in today 's society, it is rarely discussed, and it covers physical, sexual, and mental abuse, as well as marital rape. Lastly, the final point to be covered in this essay would be gender bias, gender bias occurs in the workplace, schools, the home, public places, and can be a very disturbing public violation of women 's rights. In conclusion, this essay will be looking into each of these topics in depth, explaining that women are indeed less privileged in today 's society than men.
The oppression of women has been brought into light in the recent years but it was the norm in many societies in early history especially in premodern east Asia. During that time, the roles of men and women in society were determined by great scholars that had the power to get their voice to be heard and set general rules in society. In China, scholars like Confucius, Mencius, and Mozi had great impact on the way people divided the roles between men and women. The overall oppression of women in premodern east Asia can be seen through quotes from great scholars about how women should be obedient to men, should not make important decisions in their families, and are not spoken of equally to men in society.
"Human rights are women 's rights, and women 's rights are human rights" (Hillary Clinton). This is a very important message that can be applied throughout history to prove the significance of women during time periods in which they were viewed as substantially lesser than men. Over the years, women have grown independent, fighting for their rights, changing the gender norms placed on society and the expectations women are forced to uphold. To successfully do this, women have evolved their mindset on how life should run to accommodate for gender equality. This evolution in the mindset of women is the
Maybe it is because Eve was created from a spare rib of Adam? Maybe because men are better hunters, well most men? From the beginning of time, the role of a woman in a marriage has been accepted as that of a civil servant to her family. The wife is responsible for taking care of the welfare, in addition to putting her life; if she ever dreamed of one, down in complete replacement of what her husband 's goals. In the 19th century especially, when women suffrage was starting to take shape, the definition of the perfect wife continued to be embedded into our society. The Story of the Hour by Kate Chopin, through the use of situational and dramatic irony, foreshadowing, and diction, shines a light on how the institution of marriage continue to not only repress, but put women in a role similar to that of a civil servant.
Feminist perspective developed with the ideology that women face large amounts of inequalities in a patriarchal society. They aimed to address and rid the social world of this oppression of women by men. According to Bishop, (2015) “oppression occurs when one group of people use different forms of power to keep another group down in order to exploit them. The oppressor uses the power; the oppressed are exploited” (p. 133-134). Oppression must be by individual experience and not grouped into being the same for all. This includes understanding the original ideology of feminist theory being critiqued as only considering the experiences of middle class, white women. That black women, of lower class experienced oppression much different from the other women. Women are oppressed, thus has to be understood in a different construct that women are similar in some sources, experience of oppression but also experience oppression very differently from one individual to another. Feminist theories have further been expanded do its continuation throughout society and decades to encompass many more issues and arenas than just men and women relationships. Now it seeks to understand and address oppression based on culture, race, class, etc and not only for women but for all. Therefore, Bishop (2014) outlines five components that seem common to all forms of oppression and serve to maintain its presence in society.
The fight against gender stereotypes is not just for women. Men can be just as oppressed,
Furthermore, it is my hope that anyone reading the above essay finds resonance - both men and women, young and old, from all demographics all over the world. By invoking an emotional reaction from readers, a writer hopes to align his/her beliefs/feelings with those of the audience. This establishes a solid connection and can perhaps motivate someone to respond positively/proactively. This is especially the case with the subject matter of women’s oppression. Of course, I assume that women would find such material to be especially stirring and rousing of a desire for serious, global change. It all begins with concept. This is where the seed of oppression is planted. In certain corners of the world, women are viewed as secondary to
Women’s rights, as defined by the Global Fund for Women, is “the right to live free from violence, slavery, and discrimination; to be educated; to own property; to vote; and to earn a fair and equal wage,” and in our country, there have been many instances of the violation of these rights, such as sexual harassment, gender discrimination, misogyny. These acts can even be seen at different points in the timeline of the Philippine history, be it in the past decades, or at present. Hence, the purpose of this paper is to compare women’s rights violations in the Philippines in the context of both the present, and the time of Martial Law.