Swing vs Steady
a)Swing:
Sales: 5000
Price per unit: $10
Variable Cost per unit: $2.5
Fixed Cost: $35000
Current Profit: $ 2500
New Price per additional unit: 0
New Contribution Margin = New Price per unit – Variable cost per unit =$8.5-$2.5 =$6
New Sales unit @40% additional sales= 5000*40%= 2000
Additional profit @40% additional Sales = Additional Sales* New Contribution Margin =2000*6 =$12000
New Sales unit @20% additional sales= 5000*20%= 1000
Additional profit @20% additional Sales = Additional Sales* New Contribution Margin =1000*6 =$6000
Steady: Sales: 5000
Price per unit: $10
Variable Cost per unit: $5.5
Fixed Cost: $35000
Current Profit: $ 2500
New Price per additional unit: $8.5
New
…show more content…
The change in the contribution margin for all the products is responsible for the change in profitability.
c) Swing is better positioned to take advantage of this opportunity because with a 40% increase in sales at a price of$ 8.5 per unit, it incurs additional profits of $4500; whereas Steady incurs losses of $1500.
If the companies share the market both the companies will have additional sales lower than the break-even sales resulting income lower than their current income. In such a case Steady will suffer far more losses. Low variable costs and hence lower contribution margins of Swing make the company more profitable in comparison to Steady for the sales of additional units. Since the market cannot be segmented, I would advise Swing to reduce its price and enter the market to acquire 40% additional sales. Steady should overlook the new market and continue selling to the current market without changing its price.
d) Break even sales change that would change the profits by the same amount as a reduction in price.
Initial Contribution Margin= 10-5.5=4.5
Reactive breakeven = ∆P/Initial CM =-1.5/4.5=- 33.33%
Thus a sales reduction of 33.33% percent at initial price of $10 is equivalent to losses brought about by a price reduction of 1.5.
Steady’s management believes that a price of $10 after Swings reduction to $8.5 would have brought
Although the company did show an increased gross profit of $8,255,000 with $6,358,000 less Net Sales in 2013 versus 2012, that increase is due to the reduction in product Cost of Goods Sold by $14,613,000. Since increases in product price will negatively affect sales, one of management’s primary goals is to keep prices stable. This objective is achieved through implementation of cost cutting programs, investing in more efficient equipment, and automation of more steps in the production process.
If these are both changed, what is the new contribution margin per haircut? What is the new annual break-even point in number of haircuts?
In our second assumption, instead of using the cost of goods per cases in 1986, we try to use the percentage it counts in the total expenses which is 50.4% and to find the sales needed to break-even. The detail of the calculation is shown in the answer for questions d. The result is that 95,635, a little bit higher than the estimated sales of 90,000.
Contribution Margin = (Unit selling price – unit variable cost) / unit selling price = ($9.00 – $2.60) / $9.00 = 0.7111 = 71.111%
13. If the selling price is $22 per unit, what is the contribution margin per unit sold?
A major issue is since reducing the price 20% reduces the profit margin to 15%, to maintain the same profit while reducing the price, the sales must be $28 million for this year. This is an increase of 233% in one year to justify reducing the price this much. This is a highly unlikely target.
2. Go through a margin analysis, and determine how much revenue ServiSoft will realize per unit under both distribution options.
Breakeven Analysis for Product Tylenol Approach 1 - Same price as Tylenol Approach 2a - Cheaper than Tylenol Approach 2b - Cheaper w/lowered trade cost $ $ $ $ Unit Cost (Variable Cost) 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 Trade Cost (Selling Price to Retailers) $ 1.69 $ 1.69 $ 1.05 $ 0.70 Fixed Cost (Advertising) 2,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 6,000,000 Break-Even Quantity [Fixed Cost/(Trade Cost-Unit Cost)] 1,834,862 5,504,587 13,333,333 60,000,000 Contribution Margin (Unit) 64% 64% 43% 14%
Provider B has more room for the discount, than provider A, since the profit area is wider than provider A. At the same volume provider B could still make profit even after discount. Where provider A has only a small window, and even small discount would place the provider to the left of breakeven point. After the discount, Provider A would operate under higher financial pressure. The provider would have to undertake some cost control actions, either lower the variable costs or fixed costs to push the breakeven point to the left. “To increase profit, more services must be provided or costs must be cut” ().
a. Assuming the most current operational cost levels, what sales must it generate to recoup the above investment?
By using option 1 TDS will sell 116,666.67 units more in 2003 considering is they don’t make any changes, they are only expected to reach 400,000 bottles in sales, as a result they will break even in option 2 and make a loss of (54,545.45 units) for option 3.
Change in revenue criteria increased both sales and cost of sales by $ 28 Million. The profit margin was decreased from 1.55% to
How would you use these cost and revenue estimates to determine whether a sales force increase (or possibly a decrease) is
The break-even point in number of sales in 2003 was 7,012 units sold. In 2004 the break-even point was 7,727 units sold, and in 2006, the break-even point was 11,902 units sold. In respect to the break-even point in sales dollars, the break-even point for 2003 was $7,131,204. In 2004 this value was $7,456,555, and in 2006, the break-even point rose incrementally to $11,556,842. During 2003 and 2004, Hallstead resided in their previous location which held 10,230 square feet. Between these years, there is an increase in their break-even point, but this change can be associated with a down year in sales. Their sales decreased by approximately $481,000. Along with that, we can see that Hallstead’s fixed costs remained stable, only
8.20 equals $ 86,700. The contribution margin per unit at a retail price of Cr. 6.85 equal 1.95. The required volume will be the result of dividing the profit impact on the contribution margin per unit.