Is Your Limits of Morality out of Place by Alex Prindle
In Moral Saints from the Journal of Philosophy by Susan Wolf, the author argues that moral saints are by definition “patient, considerate, even-tempered, hospitable, and charitable in thought as well as in deed”. Wolf also states that moral saints do not care about pleasing themselves, but only in pleasing others. I do not find this definition to be all encompassing of what morality really means. In other words, I disagree with her definition on morality because her definition is too restricted. In this paper, I will explain Susan Wolf’s view on morality, agree with her views that no-one should aspire to be her own definition of a moral saint, but I will disagree with her definition
…show more content…
Susan Wolf believes that the definition of morality has to do with one committing selfless acts for others while remaining non-offensive, unable to be cynical, or unable to be humorous. Moral saints do not fulfill their dreams, or goals that they set for themselves and only for themselves, because they are too busy helping others or would rather selflessly benefit others. For example, If a moral saint wanted to be a good cook, Susan Wolf believes that they wouldn’t fulfill this dream unless it was for a cause, per say, cooking for the orphanage, or the soup …show more content…
The author and I share the same perspective on how a person can live a good life without focusing all of their energies and efforts into helping others while remaining thoughtful and impartial their entire life. Someone without hobbies or without personal ambitions is certainly missing out on an important part of life and while it can make a person happy to be able to help others, it also is important to find ways to make yourself more well rounded and interesting. Plus, if a moral saint is living only to serve others, then what happens when someone turns their back on them after the moral saint offers their help? Then are they living to help others, or do their moral actions serve no purpose? Also, is the particular moral saint being moral out of the love for helping others, or because he or she will receive praise for their particular actions? This brings me to Susan Wolf’s separation between the two types of moral saints: the loving saint, and the rational saint. Wolf describes loving saints as those who sacrifice their own self-interests but do not see this sacrifice as a true sacrifice because they enjoy being a morally just person. They see moral sainthood as a way of living and technically feel happy with not doing anything for themselves but instead just purely helping others. The other type of moral saint is Wolf’s
In addition to being perceived as one of the most important attributes in a saint, heroism actually started to be praised by Christians as one of the principal qualities in any true Christian. Augustine de Hippo basically believed that in order to be seen by God as a person who was capable to serve divinity, the respective individual needed to be familiar with the attitudes that he or she needed to put across and with the fact
The history of publishing has been plagued with literary hoaxes — from the somewhat harmless Ern Malley hoax to the most recent Belle Gibson scandal. Unfortunately literary hoaxes will continue to happen, unless publishers begin to fact check manuscripts before publication. Publishers claim they are unable to do this due to the financial cost of the procedure and this is a believable claim. If you spoke to an average person they would say that the print industry is dying, thanks to the rise of digital technology, and there has been a downturn in profits.
From Rauser’s writing, he expressed passages that pertain to Smart’s dimension of ethics. Smart’s ethical dimension can be best described as a code that each person follows that helps benefits not only themselves, but their community too. Some passages were “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” (Luke, 6:31), and love you enemies and pray for those who persecute you. These are golden rules to live by as it promotes good behavior towards others. These ethics can be split down into two categories, virtue and value. Virtue takes on the internal aspect on what the individual should act; it shows the character of the person. Value takes the external aspect, on how a community of act based on their actions. Both of them are important as they are the basis of our morals.
-She claims this essay is moral philosophy and feels she must clarify whether her philosophy is
The pope has very good morals. The same characteristics of a moral person are seen within Huck in the book Adventure of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain. The book is about a little boy named Huck who runs away with a slave named Jim and they go on many unexpected adventures. Huck saved a family’s fortune, Huck rescues Jim from slavery, and I helped a young girl do the right thing.These examples all show how people have good morality.
In Susan Wolf’s, “Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life” Susan writes what makes a meaningful life, her belief is as followed “Active engagement in objective worthwhile activities.” Wolf believe this is the solution to a happy life instead of a depressing and sad one. Wolf said that both Active engagement and objective worthwhile activities need to be present to have a meaningful life. Thought the page, we will see how Wolf arguments requires both parts to accomplish meaningful life then we will make an objection to the arguments which I will then respond to argue against showing why the objection is false.
In Iris Murdoch’s ‘Morality and Religion”, she discusses the balance between the conscious morality of human nature and the connection between a supernatural being of religious beliefs. Murdoch writes on the topic of virtue, if there can only be one true concept of it, or if there are multiple ideas or beliefs that create it. Murdoch then goes to discuss the difference between virtue and duty, which ultimately comes down to three types: virtue ethics, duty ethics, and pragmatic ethics. When she speaks of morality, she questions if good behavior has any part of religious idealism or if a nonreligious being could foster just as good behavior. Then leading into the feeling of guilt and if morality relates to it. Finishing her passage in the thought of whether religion is moral in nature and if high morality is essentially religion.
“as someone who has a standing commitment to leading an objectively consequentialist life, but who need not set special stock in any particular form of
Francis spent his early years as the spoiled son of a merchant from the nouveau rich class. He was accustomed to violence and even went to war in a battle between Assisi and Perugia. This all changed later, as he become truly selfless. One of his friends noticed this sudden change in Francis and asked him, “Francis are you going to take a wife?” In response he said, “I will marry a nobler and fairer bride than you ever saw, who shall surpass all others in beauty and excel them in wisdom.” The lady he was referring to was Lady Poverty. He would go on to sell off all his possessions including his own horse and attempted to give the money to the decaying St. Damian Church which the priest would not accept. It is worth noting that the priest did not take the money because he found the change of heart within Francis startling. “The priest was amazed, and wondering at a change of circumstances incredibly sudden, refused to believe what he heard; and, thinking he was being hoaxed, he would not keep the offered money.” The skeptical reaction of the priest shows how radical and revolutionary Saint Francis’ generosity was, but also how rare a man like Francis was at a this point in
Accordingly, whatever the excellent person finds pleasurable, should be considered the standard for judging individuals moral quality, as stated in the following passage:
In Joan Didion’s piece, “On Morality,” she objectivity thinks that every individual has a different conception of morality. She believes that each individual has their own meaning of morality and that people use their own personal meanings to justify right versus wrong in life. I agree with Joan Didion that people determine what is considered to be moral in their own opinions. Overall, I believe that morality exists and that it is defined differently by each individual. I believe that humans collectively require morality in order to prevent chaos and that everyone defines what is right by their own personal opinion. Overall, as a society, I believe that morality is needed to draw a thin line between the right and wrong whether they are based on law or morals.
well." This means abiding by a set of values and morals which will lead to a
A saint is a person who’s admired or venerated because of their virtue. Throughout the novel Fifth Business by Robertson Davies, it has been well stated that Dunstan Ramsey would do anything for Mrs Dempster. Davies uses the idea of Dunstan replacing his own mother figure with Mrs. Dempster, if she is a Saint then he did not ruin her life by his involvement with the snowball incident and that he needs her to be a Saint in his mind to liberate himself of guilt.
Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, an African American abolitionist woman in pre-Civil War America, utilized her education to write about and fight for civil rights and gender equality throughout her lifetime (Strong Female Friday). Her desire and willingness to fight for social reform was fueled by the inconsistencies and double standards that she viewed within the society in which she lived, both based on race and gender. In the poem “A Double Standard” by Frances Ellen Watkins Harper, the issue of gender discrimination is discussed through the portrayal of the contrasting principles in society regarding society’s response to a sexual encounter between a male and female. Harper approaches the issue by advocating not for greater rights for women at the expense of men, but for equality among men and women. Although there have been various monumental advancements for women since pre- Civil War America, Harper’s claim that the sexes have not reached a point of equality as seen through double standards in society can be seen within modern-day America based on societal standards in sexual relationships, the workplace, and society’s expectations of the sexes.
Characteristics of the genre the work does/doesn’t meet: The book is not true so is considered fiction, also Carrie falls in love with the Charles so it is romance.