Surveillance Program Unethical Use Of Computer

Government surveillance is made with the intent to keep American society safe, usually made in response to major terrorist attacks to prevent future terrorist attacks. After the tragic events of 9/11 the Us government took measures to prevent future terrorist attacks from happening. One major act enacted was the Patriot act.

Over the last several years, cyber attacks have been continually rising. This is in response to emerging threats from rogue nations and terrorist groups. They are increasing their attacks on government, military and civilian installations. According to James Clapper (the Director of National Intelligence) these threats have become so severe. It is surpassing terrorism as the greatest challenge facing the nation. In response, the National Security Agency (NSA) began conducting surveillance on those who are involved in these activities and others which are threat to US national security interests. This program became so broad; it started continually collecting phone records and emails on ordinary Americans. This angered many, who felt that the US was acting in a way that circumvented established legal guidelines and procedures. To fully understand what is taking place requires focusing on the event, the government 's response and the ways it did / did not meet our national security goals. Together, these different elements will illustrate what occurred and the lasting impacts on everyone. (Greenwald 2014)

Government surveillance is beneficial in moderation, but can quite easily become excessive. A well-known example of this is the controversy regarding the NSA monitoring U.S. citizens discreetly on American soil. This unwarranted watch crosses the fine line between monitoring criminal suspects for security, and blatant overreach of authority in spying common citizens. The personal infringement of information has been commonly associated with the NSA’s PRISM, but their MUSCULAR program is much more disconcerting. According to Harry Bruinius in “Why Tech Giants Are Now Uniting Against U.S. Surveillance”:

The NSA Surveillance of Citizens is a topic that deals with the privacy of people. Everyone deserves the right to their own privacy and the surveillance of citizens has token their entitled right to their privacy. Throughout American history one thing that has helped secure our country and freedoms in intelligence. Americans have benefited from this intelligence because of the limited government traditions. The government branches has their own views that may differ from others but they are the ones that deal with the decisions that have to be made to handle this situation in what is necessary.

The issue of the NSA surveillance would not be happening if it was not for the plane crashes of September 11th, 2001, an event that could have been prevented if the government had taken the measures of surveillance it has today. The effectiveness of the NSA’s programming today could have pinpointed the people carrying out the plans to aboard the planes and take control during that time. As an enormous country, it can be helpful to know where threats stand and where they don’t. As President Obama stated in his NSA reformation speech,

The government offered the domestic surveillance programs to reinstate a feeling of safety. Although comforting shell shocked citizens, current programs are becoming unnecessarily invasive, financially costly, and controversially uneffective. Many people believe that these programs undermine the fourth amendment of the Constitution of our nation. It is certain that we need domestic surveillance with jihadist groups continually growing but it is obvious that systems in place today are not working.

The surveillance is not as good as US government said, although government announced that the surveillance prevents over 50 potential terrorist attacks in the United States, the authors of the report NSA’s Bulk Surveillance Programs Stop Terrorists? Showed that NSA surveillance only initiated 7.5% investigation of terrorism, of which a few of investigations are legal compared to traditional investigative methods which initiated 60% of the investigation, In addition, NSA Director Alexander admitted that the bulk collection of American phone date had only prevented one known terrorist attack. Thus, government surveillance has low efficiency. What is more, the bulk collection is not accurate, Innocent jokes or statement can mislead government surveillance, a man named Joe Lipari Spent two years on fighting charge because the paraphrased a quote form fill Fight Club. And also the targets of surveillance are ambiguous, during the war I, government surveillance targeted on precursors to the FBI, the Bureau of the investigation, war critics and even anti-draft activists who are the innocent citizens. January Mughal mentioned that the surveillance still necessary, in spite of its disadvantages, to protect our security and bring justice if it focuses on suspected terrorists or person of thereat, demonstrates a warrant and is put in public spaces. However, it is not that easy to protect

They do as many good things as bad. They stop terrorist attacks on our country. They also watch American citizens that have done a crime or suspected of about to do a crime, which is for a greater good. Citizens may say, it is okay for them to bend the law to protect the citizens, they may say that invading our privacy shouldn't be a problem if we are not doing anything wrong. That is true to a point. But, the NSA is not just violating foreign invaders. They are also violating American citizens just as much. When does it stop? It is not okay to take away something from us, as citizens, without our consent. As an American we have the right to our civil rights. We have the right to privacy and no matter how high in government that should not be taken away from us. It is okay for the NSA to do their job, protecting U.S citizens from terrorist attacks, if they did not have to bend the rules to do it. The NSA has been caught hacking navigation systems many times to find their assignments, the contact they are looking for. It is not okay to bend or break the laws because it’s for the government. The government is suppose to protect this country. It is not suppose to spy on its on

Technological Surveillance In an age where instant communication and technology provide easy and ready access to information, the society and the individual is caught between two very controversial principles- open information and privacy. The perceptions and expectations of privacy are rapidly changing as a result of current developments in surveillance technologies. The question is are these new surveillance technologies endangering the values and morals of our democratic society, the society we have worked for many centuries to achieve?

I have been a part of different activities for my community service. I have helped with feeding the homeless with IHS HOSA. We went to Costco to buy items to make spaghetti, salad, and desserts. The day before we went to feed the homeless, we made all of the food. Then the day of, we prepared the food to put into containers, and loaded everything into our cars. We drove all around El Centro, parks, Main St., and outside of well known stores such as Target, and stopped whenever we saw someone less fortunate walking.

Government surveillance has not contributed to a decrease of percentage in crimes, but has created a controversial topic instead. Online surveillance has been an invasion of privacy, because everything the users access is seen without their consent. Due to the fact the stored data is not used, government surveillance in the united states has not been very impactful. Crimes and terrorist attacks were not stopped, and the mass storage of personal data within the last year has violated privacy laws 2,776 times (Government Surveillance 722). Surveillance online is not only unsuccessful in America, but in UK, and Canada as well. Out of every 1000 security cameras, only one camera is actually used to catch a criminal (Government Surveillance 722). However, there are several solutions that can be made to allow the usage of government surveillance without the violating the rights of Americans. Some of the solutions have already taken action, and will give users more freedom online.

The cause of terrorist attacks like 9/11 tragedy the government has ramped ups the security and surveillance of the activist, journalist and dissidents. It is no secret that the government are able to have assess of people phone call records and text messages but for that reason that, activists avoid using telephones, instead they use tools like Skype. Which they think they are immune to interception but they are wrong. Over the last years there has been an industry of companies who provide surveillance technology to the government, technology that allows the government to hack into computers. Rather that intercepting the commutations as they go over the wire, instead the government now hacks into your computer, enable your webcam and your microphone and able to steal and look through documents from your computer. In the article “ Quasi- Constitutional Protection and Government Surveillance” by Emily Berman argues “ The government may collect and analyze unprecedented amounts of information about U.S persons’ communications, but without concomitant safeguards against infringing on individual privacy” (781). According to this, it indicates that all the access the government is able to see and how it is invading American’s privacy.

This gives organizations information that the user may not aware is being recorded and shared. Without knowing it, we are leaving “ electronic fingerprints” with every mouse click, every phone call, is recorded and used for analysis purposes, which tend to be justified through the idea that it is used to help protect civilians from terrorist or other threats. Though surveillance is used to protect society, it can go as far as to even control and monitor society. In countries like China, the government uses surveillance to censor what is available to the public, and therefore allows the leaders of the country to maintain a tighter grip on society.

The Potato Eaters is a naturalistic oil painting by the reputable Dutch artist Vincent van Gogh, in the collection of the Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam. The painting was completed in 1885 and as is widely considered as Van Gogh’s first masterpiece as the artist himself has regarded it as his most successful painting. A horizontal composition about 82cm x 114cm, the painting depicts a family of peasants, four woman and a man around a square table having potatoes for supper. Somber and earthly tones are used for the painting to emphasize the humble and low life of peasants.

When the society perceive and acknowledge male dominance as a social norm, it will cause men to believe that they rule above other gender. According to Taylor (2012), men have the urge to be in all control and powerful. Men tend to view women as inferior beings, so they self-appointed themselves to manage women’s lives in order to boost up their dominance. On the other hand, women are expected to surrender to men’s dominancy without questioning their validity because revolt will only lead to violence. In New Delhi, an innocent girl was shot dead just because she refused to be sexually harassed. It is clear that in such cases, men use violence as a way to “tame” women and force women to succumb to their dominance. Consequently, women have