preview

Summary: The Long Term Effects Of Abortion On Women

Better Essays

In a time fraught with hot button issues, one that polarizes perhaps more than any other is that of abortion. Unfortunately, it is also an issue that is difficult to write about while remaining unbiased. Paul Stark’s “How Abortion Hurts Women” and Sarah Barnes’ “The Long Term Effects of Abortion on Women” both set out to prove that abortion has serious side effects on the affected party. Both Stark and Barnes cite several studies done in both America and abroad to support their claims, as well as, in Barnes case, offering their own insights on the matter. It seems that both authors purpose is to enlighten their audiences on the under-reported effects of abortion on women in order to spark a new conversation that doesn’t center around the unborn …show more content…

Without a doubt, Stark has taken the most direct approach to the issue and his content reflects that. He quickly covers the physical effects of the procedure, the long term effects, and the psychological effects without ever diverging in any drastic manner. However, through this approach he not only misses several opportunities to expand on important ideas, he also simply leaves many questions unanswered. Under the section “Physical risks of abortion,” twice Stark uses the word ‘significant’ instead of offering the exact statistic. Barnes, on the other hand, offers the numbers that Stark decided to omit. For example, Stark acknowledges “…maternal mortality rates after abortion were significantly higher than after childbirth (Stark, 2013).” Barnes, on the other hand, opts instead to avoid this ambiguous statement and instead offers “…short-term severe complications occur in less than 1% of women who have abortions (RN, 2010).” At the same time, the somewhat lacking amount of material in Stark’s article has allowed him to stay on message with little temptation to deviate or, even worse, turn the argument into one of emotion. Nevertheless, his article is weaker

Get Access